Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2005

New Capital Cost Table for Highway Investment Economic Analysis

Abstract

The FHWA maintains the Highway Economic Requirements System (HERS) model to enable the estimation of highway investment requirements for the biennial Status of the Nation's Highways, Bridges, and Transit: Conditions and Performance report to Congress. The HERS logic relies on the application of benefit–cost analysis to evaluate and select the best set of roadway improvements for systemwide implementation. Benefits of roadway improvements are calculated from user and agency cost savings (including externalities), and cost is considered simply the capital cost of the improvement. The current research seeks to improve the knowledge of the unit capital costs of improvements modeled in HERS with the use of as-built road construction cost data previously developed for FHWA and bid–schedule data published by various highway agencies. The construction cost dataset used contained detailed data on more than 2,500 construction projects in six states; however, it lacked enough samples to apply either econometrics or generalized statistical analysis to make reliable estimates for all roadway improvement and cost categories in HERS. Both deterministic and probabilistic methods were applied to engineering specifications along with bid–schedule data on various roadway improvement projects to generate capital cost data for each of the classification variables. The final cost table data developed resulted in national highway improvement capital cost data that most realistically corresponded with a typical cost variation across land terrain and urban population density for a given improvement type. For some classification variables the new cost data are 60% to 150% higher than the previous HERS cost estimates.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Highway Economics Requirements System. Technical Report. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2000.
2. Transportation Cost and Benefit Analysis, Techniques, Estimates, and Implications. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, British Columbia, Canada, 2003.
3. KPMG. The Cost of Transporting People in the British Columbia Lower Mainland. Transport 2021/Greater Vancouver Regional District, 1993.
4. The Environmental and Social Costs of Heavy Goods: Vehicles and Options for Reforming the Fiscal Regime, English, Welsh, and Scottish Railway. Oxford Economic Research Associates, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom, 1999. www.ewsrailway.co.uk.
5. Lee D. Full Cost Pricing of Highways. U.S. Department of Transportation, Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, Cambridge, Mass., 1995.
6. Tighe S. Guidelines for Probabilistic Pavement Life-Cycle Cost Analysis. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1769, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001, pp. 28–38.
7. Battelle. Updating the Highway Improvement Cost Model Report. Report BAT-00-016. Final Report. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2001.
8. Highway Construction Cost Survey. Final Report. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, 2002.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2005
Issue published: January 2005

Rights and permissions

© 2005 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammed (Maks) Alam
Transportation and Space Division, Battelle, 505 King Avenue, Columbus, OH.
Darren Timothy
Highway Needs and Investment Analysis Team, Office of Legislation and Strategic Planning, FHWA, 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590.
Stephen Sissel
Highway Needs and Investment Analysis Team, Office of Legislation and Strategic Planning, FHWA, 400 7th Street, SW, Washington, DC 20590.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 47

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 3

  1. A fuzzy rule-based system for terrain classification in highway design
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. International Trade Transportation Cost Based on Internet of Things-As...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Estimation of Representative Capital and Maintenance Costs for Canadia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub