Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2005

Challenges of Measuring Performance for FAA's Safety Oversight System

Abstract

FAA regulates the safety of the aviation industry through the safety oversight system, which is a system of rulemaking, standard-setting, certification, accident investigation, rule enforcement, and surveillance activities. Federal programs, including those of FAA, use performance indicators to measure the achievement of program goals. As part of a broader program of developing risk management methodologies, FAA is researching performance indicators that can be used to measure the performance of the safety oversight system. One of its goals is to create performance indicators that can describe the safety oversight system's influence on safety outcomes such as fatalities. Creating performance measures that link activities to safety outcomes is challenging because it is difficult to establish the causation between oversight activities and these safety outcomes. This challenge is not unique to FAA, and external reviewers such as the Government Accountability Office have recommended that other high-reliability sectors, including rail, develop such indicators. In addition to safety outcomes, other aspects of safety oversight system performance can be described with meaningful metrics. The background and motivation for oversight evaluation in the aviation industry and in general are discussed, as well as the challenges, some generic and some unique, of evaluating aviation safety oversight activities. Research is also presented on how safety oversight evaluation is conducted outside aviation.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Kemp D. The Federal Aviation Administration's Air Safety Program. Presented at Government-Industry System Safety Conference, NASA Safety Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, May 1–3, 1968.
2. Budget of the United States Government, Fiscal Year 2005. Office of Management and Budget, Appendix, p. 767. www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/appendix.html. Accessed July 31, 2004.
3. Aviation Safety: Weaknesses in Inspection and Enforcement Limit FAA in Identifying and Responding to Risks. GAO/RCED-98-6. General Accounting Office, Feb. 1998.
4. Burkhardt R. The Federal Aviation Administration. Frederick A. Praeger, New York, 1967.
5. Aviation Safety: FAA's New Inspection System Offers Promise, but Problems Need to Be Addressed. GAO/RCED-99-183. General Accounting Office, June 1999.
6. Lederer J. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Presented at Government-Industry System Safety Conference, NASA Safety Office, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, May 1–3, 1968.
7. Oversight of Aircraft Maintenance, Continuing Analysis and Surveillance Systems. AV-2002-066. Office of Inspector General, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
8. Aircraft Accident Report: Loss of Control and Impact with Pacific Ocean, Alaska Airlines Flight 261, McDonnell Douglas MD-83, N963AS About 2.7 Miles North of Anacapa Island, California, January 31, 2000. NTSB/AAR-02/01. National Transportation Safety Board, 2002.
9. Niemeier D. SASO Communication Messages. Presented at Risk Management Decision Support Meeting, Atlantic City, N.J., July 13, 2004.
10. Fazen K. M. Risk Management Decision Support—RPD 676 Commercial Aviation Requirements Program Review. Presented at Risk Management Decision Support Meeting, Atlantic City, N.J., July 13, 2004.
11. Patton M. Q. Utilization-Focused Evaluation. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, Calif., 1978.
12. Wilson J. Q. Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It. Basic Books, New York, 1989.
13. Kettl D. F., and DiIulio J. J. Jr. Inside the Reinvention Machine: Appraising Governmental Reform. Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C., 1995.
14. Assessing Program Performance for the FY 2005 Budget. Office of Management and Budget. www.whitehouse.gov/omb/part/. Accessed July 31, 2004.
15. Nader R., and Smith W. J. Collision Course: The Truth About Airline Safety. Tab Books, Blue Ridge Summit, Pa., 1994.
16. Schiavo M., and Chartrand S. Flying Safe, Flying Blind. Avon Books, New York, 1997.
17. National Civil Aviation Review Commission. Avoiding Aviation Gridlock and Reducing the Accident Rate: A Consensus for Change. www.faa.gov/NCARC/reports/pepele.htm. Accessed July 31, 2003.
18. Commons N. Bonfires to Beacons: Federal Civil Aviation Policy Under the Air Commerce Act, 1926–1938. FAA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1978.
19. Oster C. V. Jr., Strong J. S., and Zorn C. K. Why Airplanes Crash: Aviation Safety in a Changing World. Oxford University Press, New York, 1992.
20. AFS-900, System Approach to Safety Oversight—Mission Need Statement. FAA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2001.
21. Barnett A., and Wang A. Airline Safety: The Recent Record. NEXTOR Research Report RR-98-7. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Mass., 1998.
22. Barnett A. The Mother Metric? FAA's New Safety Index. Presented at Moving Metrics: A Performance-Oriented View of the Aviation Infrastructure, Asilomar Conference Center, Pacific Grove, Calif., Jan. 27–30, 2004.
23. Accident/Incident Overview. FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation. http://safetydata.fra.dot.gov/officeofsafety/. Accessed July 30, 2004.
24. Department of Transportation PART Assessments. Office of Management and Budget. www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2005/pma/transportation.pdf. Accessed July 31, 2003.
25. Five-Year Strategic Plan for Railroad Research, Development, and Demonstrations. FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
26. Molitoris J. M. Statement of Jolene M. Molitoris. Testimony before the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation Subcommittee on Surface Transportation and Merchant Marine, Feb. 25, 1998.
27. Reactor Oversight Process Self-Assessment for Calendar Year 2003. SECY-04-0053. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2004.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2005
Issue published: January 2005

Rights and permissions

© 2005 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mark Hansen
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National Center of Excellence for Aviation Operations Research, University of California–Berkeley, 107 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720.
Carolyn McAndrews
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, National Center of Excellence for Aviation Operations Research, University of California–Berkeley, 107 McLaughlin Hall, Berkeley, CA 94720.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 47

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Public Diplomacy Becomes Measurable Outcomes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub