Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals

Abstract

Shared-use paths are becoming increasingly busy across the United States. Path designers need guidance on how wide to make new or rebuilt paths and on whether to separate the different types of users. The current guidance is not specific, has not been calibrated to conditions in the United States, and does not accommodate the range of modes found on a typical path. The purpose of this project, sponsored by FHWA, was to develop a level-of-service (LOS) estimation method for shared-use paths that overcomes these limitations. The focus of this paper is on the collection of the perceptions of path users and the development of a model relating those perceptions to operational and path variables. Companion papers describe the efforts made to develop equations explaining path operations and to develop an LOS estimation tool based on the perception model. For this effort, the project team collected the perceptions of 105 volunteers viewing 36 video clips from 10 paths. Analysis showed that variables related to path operations and the path width had the strongest relationships to the overall quality of the trail experience. The recommended model for overall rating included terms for path width, the number of meeting and passing events, and the presence of a centerline. The model was statistically sound; it should be easy to use. Analysts should be able to use the model and the procedure for determination of the LOS, which is based on the model, with confidence, knowing that it is well grounded on the perceptions of a large sample of trail users.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1999.
2. Special Report 209: Highway Capacity Manual, 3rd ed. (1997 update). TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998.
3. Rouphail N. M., Hummer J. E., Allen D. P., and Milazzo J. S. II Capacity Analysis of Pedestrian and Bicycle Facilities: Recommended Procedures for the Bicycles Chapter of the Highway Capacity Manual. Report FHWA-RD-98-108. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2000.
4. Highway Capacity Manual. Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
5. Botma H., and Papendrecht H. Traffic Operation of Bicycle Traffic. In Transportation Research Record 1320, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 65–72.
6. Harkey D. L., Reinfurt D. W., Knuiman M., Stewart J., and Sorton A. The Bicycle Compatibility Index: A Level of Service Concept. Final Report FHWA-RD-98-095. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 1998.
7. Landis B. W., Vattikuti V. R., and Brannick M. T. Real-Time Human Perceptions: Toward a Bicycle Level of Service. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 119–126.
8. Hummer J. E., Rouphail N. M., and Milazzo J. S. II Operational Analysis of Shared Use Paths: Data Collection and Model Validation. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
9. Patten R. S., Schneider R. J., Toole J. L., Hummer J. E., Rouphail N. M., and Do A. Shared Use Path Bicycle Level of Service Procedure. Presented at 84th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2005.
10. Hummer J. E., Rouphail N. M., Green J. S., Hughes R. G., Fain S. J., Toole J. L., Patten R. S., and Schneider R. J. Evaluation of Safety, Design and Operation of Shared Use Paths. Final Report. Report FHWA-HRT-05-137. Office of Safety Research and Development, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2005.
11. Patten R. S., Schneider R. J., Toole J. L., Hummer J. E., and Rouphail N. M. Shared Use Path Bicycle Level of Service Calculator: A User's Guide. Report FHWA-HRT-05-138. Office of Safety Research and Development, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, McLean, Va., 2005.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2005
Issue published: January 2005

Rights and permissions

© 2005 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Joseph E. Hummer
Department of Civil, Construction, and Environmental Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-7908.
Nagui Rouphail
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Ronald G. Hughes
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Highway Safety Research Center, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC 27514.
Shannon J. Fain
Institute for Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601.
Jennifer L. Toole
Toole Design Group, 4603 Calvert Road, College Park, MD 20740.
Robert S. Patten
Toole Design Group, 4603 Calvert Road, College Park, MD 20740.
Robert J. Schneider
Toole Design Group, 4603 Calvert Road, College Park, MD 20740.
John F. Monahan
Department of Statistics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC 27695-8203.
Ann Do
Office of Safety Research and Development, Turner–Fairbank Highway Research Center, FHWA, McLean, VA 22101.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 72

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 15

  1. Space sharing between pedestrians and micro-mobility vehicles: A syste...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Evaluating the Impact of COVID-19 on the Behaviour of Pedestrians
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Shapley Additive Explanation Method for Assessing Motorized Two-Wheele...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Shared space: Negotiating sites of (un)sustainable mobility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Studying bicyclists’ perceived level of safety using a bicycle simulat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Do attitudes and perceptions help to explain cycling infrastructure qu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A methodology for the assessment of pedestrians-cyclists shared space ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Perceived safety and experienced incidents between pedestrians and cyc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Quantifying the Negative Impact of Interactions Between Users of Pedes...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Exploring effects of environment density on heterogeneous populations’...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Modelling automobile users’ response pattern in defining urban street ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Can pedestrians and cyclists share the same space? The case of a city ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. The Importance of Assessing the Level of Service in Confined Infrastru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Neural Network Approach to Determine LOS Criteria of Urban Streets for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Level-of-Service Model for Protected Bike Lanes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub