Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2005

Evaluating the Safety of Shared-Use Paths: Results from Three Corridors in Connecticut

Abstract

The project described in this paper involved the design of a survey of shared-use path safety for use at three facilities in Connecticut in the fall of 2002 and the summer of 2003. The objective was to collect self-reported information on collision and fall events and on travel exposure so that crash rates could be developed. The analysis of the self-reported events and travel patterns provides complementary data that are not available from other sources but are needed to address safety concerns on these facilities. The strengths of this approach include the collection of underreported minor events and the ability to estimate travel exposure and thus allow the estimation of crash rates per unit distance. The sample size of 684 was sufficient only for the development of aggregate crash rates, which suggest that skaters have the highest rates, followed by bicyclists and then pedestrians. The bicycle event rate was three times that of pedestrians, while the rate for skaters was more than six times that for pedestrians. Falls were more frequently reported than collisions, and they were more often associated with an injury. The overall incident rate for each of the three individual facilities was the highest for the path with the highest user volume and highest percentage of skaters and cyclists.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Task Force on Geometric Design, AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1999.
2. Doherty S., Aultman-Hall L., and Swaynos J. Commuter Cyclist Accident Patterns in Toronto and Ottawa, Canada. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 126, No. 1, Jan./Feb., 2000, pp. 21–26.
3. Osberg J. S., and Stiles S. C. Safety Behavior of Inline Skaters. AAA Foundation for Traffic Safety, Washington, D.C., 2001.
4. Stutts J., and Hunter W. Injuries to Pedestrians and Bicyclists: An Analysis Based on Hospital Emergency Department Data. Report FHWA-RD-99-078. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1999.
5. Frankovich R. J., Petrella R. J., and Lattanzio C. N. In-Line Skating Injuries: Patterns and Protective Equipment Use. Physician and Sports Medicine, Vol. 29, No. 4, 2001.
6. daSilva M. P., Smith J. D., and Najm W. G. Analysis of Pedestrian Crashes. Report DOT-VNTSC-NHTSA-02-02. Volpe National Transportation Systems Center, 2003.
7. Aultman-Hall L., and Kaltenecker K. G. Toronto Bicycle Commuter Safety Rates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 31, 1999, pp. 675–686.
8. Aultman-Hall L., and Hall F. L. Ottawa-Carleton On- and Off-Road Cyclist Accident Rates. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 30, No. 1, 1998, pp. 29–43.
9. Moritz W. E. Survey of North American Bicycle Commuters: Design and Aggregate Results. In Transportation Research Record 1578, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1997, pp. 91–101.
10. Rodier C., Shaheen S., and Chung S. Unsafe at Any Speed? What the Literature Says About Low Speed Modes. Presented at 83rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2004.
11. Schieber R. A., and Branche-Dorsey C. M. In-Line Skating Injuries: Epidemiology and Recommendations for Prevention. Sports Medicine, Vol. 19, No. 6, 1995, pp. 427–432.
12. Birriel E., Pernia J. C., Lu J. J., and Petritsch T. A. The Operational Characteristics of Inline Skaters. Improving Transportation Systems Safety and Performance. 2001 Spring Conference and Exhibit, Institute of Transportation Engineers, Monterey, Calif., March 2001.
13. Dewey J. F., Demslow D., Lenze D., Holt L., and Lotfinia B. Transportation Issues: Pedestrian Safety. Bureau of Economic and Business Research, University of Florida, Gainesville, 2003.
14. Herbert N., Martinez K. L., and Porter B. E. The Likelihood of Becoming a Pedestrian Fatality and Driver's Knowledge of Pedestrian Rights and Responsibilities in the Commonwealth of Virginia. Transportation Research, Part F: Traffic Psychology & Behavior Vol. 7, No. 1, 2004, pp. 43–58.
15. Campbell B. J., Zegeer C. V., Huang H. H., and Cynecki M. J. A Review of Pedestrian Safety Research in the United States and Abroad. Report FHWA-RD-03-042. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2004.
16. Jordan G., and Leso L. Power of the Line: Shared-Use Path Conflict Reduction. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1705, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 16–19.
17. Landis B. W., Petritsch T. A., Huang H. F., and Do A. H. Characteristics of Emerging Road and Trail Users and Their Safety. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1878. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 131–139.
18. Clarke A., and Tracy L. Bicycle Safety-Related Research Synthesis. Report 94-062. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, April 1995.
19. Florida Department of Transportation. Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: Exploration of Collision Exposure in Florida. NuStats International, Austin, Tex., Dec. 1998.
20. Turner P., and Simek C. Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel: Exploration of Collision Exposure in Florida. Final Report. Center for Urban Transportation Research and NuStats International, Sept. 2002.
21. Turner S., Shunk G., and Hottenstein A. Development of a Methodology to Estimate Bicycle and Pedestrian Travel Demand. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 1998.
22. Hunter W. W., and Huang H. F. User Counts on Bicycle Lanes and Multiuse Trails in the United States. In Transportation Research Record 1502, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 45–57.
23. Kyle S. B., Nance M. L., Rutherford G. W. Jr., and Winston F. K. Skateboard-Associated Injuries: Participation-Based Estimates and Injury Characteristics. Journal of Trauma Injury, Infection, and Critical Care, Vol. 53, No. 4, Oct. 2002, pp. 686–690.
24. U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission. Unpowered Scooters. Consumer Product Safety Review, Vol. 6, No. 4, 2002, p. 4.
25. Hauer E. Statistical Test of the Difference Between Expected Accident Frequencies. Transportation Research Record No. 1542. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1996, pp. 24–29.
26. Highway Statistics 2001. Office of Highway Policy Information, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
27. Aultman-Hall L., and LaMondia J. Developing a Methodology to Evaluate the Safety of Shared-Use Paths: Results from Three Corridors in Connecticut. Final Research Report. Report 04-297. Connecticut Cooperative Highway Research Program, June 2004.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2005
Issue published: January 2005

Rights and permissions

© 2005 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Lisa Aultman-Hall
Connecticut Transportation Institute and Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 261 Glenbrook Road, Storrs, CT 06269.
Jeffrey LaMondia
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Connecticut, 261 Glenbrook Road, Storrs, CT 06269.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 117

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Exploring the Shared Use Pathway: A Review of the Design and Demand Es...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Pedestrian Crossings as a Means of Reducing Conflicts between Cyclists...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Space sharing between pedestrians and micro-mobility vehicles: A syste...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Using Global Positioning System Big Data to Define a Bikeshare User Ty...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Pedestrians-Cyclists Shared Spaces Level of Service: Comparison of Met...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. An exposure based study of crash and injury rates in a cohort of trans...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub