Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Laser–Air-Coupled Hybrid Noncontact System for Defect Detection in Rail Tracks: Status of FRA Prototype Development at University of California–San Diego

Abstract

Recent train accidents, with associated direct and indirect costs as well as safety concerns, have reaffirmed the need for developing rail defect detection systems that are more effective than those used today. One of the recent developments in rail inspection is the use of ultrasonic guided waves and noncontact probing techniques to target transverse-type defects. Besides the obvious advantages of noncontact probing, which include robustness and potential for large inspection speed, such a system can detect transverse defects under horizontal shelling or head checks. A rail inspection prototype based on these concepts and funded by the FRA is under development at the University of California–San Diego. This work reports on the status of the prototype development, including hardware and software development. Key features of the software are the feature extraction and the automatic pattern recognition algorithms. The laboratory results demonstrate the detection and sizing of transverse, surface-breaking cracks that extend for less than 20% of the rail head cross-sectional area.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Federal Railroad Administration. Safety Statistics Data: 1992–2002. FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
2. Wilcox P. Evans M. Pavlakovic B. Alleyne D. Vine K. Cawley P. and Lowe M. G. Guided Wave Testing of Rail. INSIGHT—Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, Vol. 45, No. 6 2003, pp. 413–420.
3. Rose J. L. Avioli M. J. Mudge P. and Sanderson R. Guided Wave Inspection Potential of Defects in Rail. NDT&E International, Vol. 37, No. 2 2004, pp. 153–161.
4. Lanza di Scalea F. and McNamara J. Ultrasonic NDE of Railroad Tracks: Air-coupled Cross-Sectional Inspection and Long-range Inspection. INSIGHT—Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, Vol. 45, No. 6 2003, pp. 394–401.
5. McNamara J. Lanza di Scalea F. and Fateh M. Automatic Defect Classification in Long-Range Ultrasonic Rail Inspection Using a Support Vector Machine-Based Smart System. INSIGHT—Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, Vol. 46, No. 6 2004, pp. 331–337.
6. Bartoli I. Lanza di Scalea F. Fateh M. and Viola E. Modeling Guided Wave Propagation with Application to the Long-Range Defect Detection in Railroad Tracks. NDT&E International, Vol. 38, No. 5 2005, pp. 325–334.
7. Lanza di Scalea F. Bartoli I. Rizzo P. and McNamara J. On-line High-Speed Rail Defect Detection. Report DOT/FRA/ORD-04/16. Oct. 2004.
8. Lanza di Scalea F. Advances in Non-contact Ultrasonic Inspection of Railroad Tracks. Experimental Techniques, Vol. 24, No. 5 2000, pp. 23–26.
9. Lanza di Scalea F. Bartoli I. Rizzo P. and Fateh M. High-Speed Defect Detection in Rails by Noncontact Guided Ultrasonic Testing. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1916, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 66–77.
10. Kenderian S. Djordjevic B. B. and Green R. E. Jr. Laser-Based and Air-Coupled Ultrasound as Noncontact and Remote Techniques for Testing of Railroad Tracks. Materials Evaluation, Vol. 60, No. 1 2002, pp. 65–70.
11. Kenderian S. Cerniglia D. Djordjevic B. B. Garcia G. Sun J. and Snell M. Rail Track Field Testing Using Laser/Air Hybrid Ultrasonic Technique. Materials Evaluation, Vol. 61, No. 10 2003, pp. 1129–1133.
12. McNamara J. and Lanza di Scalea F. Improvements in Non-contact Ultrasonic Testing of Rails by the Discrete Wavelet Transform. Materials Evaluation, Vol. 62, No. 3 2004, pp. 365–372.
13. Lanza di Scalea F. Rizzo P. Coccia S. Bartoli I. Fateh M. Viola E. and Pascale G. Non-contact Ultrasonic Inspection of Rails and Signal Processing for Automatic Defect Detection and Classification. INSIGHT—Non-Destructive Testing and Condition Monitoring, Vol. 47, No. 6 2005, pp. 346–353.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Francesco Lanza di Scalea
NDE & Structural Health Monitoring Laboratory, University of California–San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, M.C. 0085, La Jolla, CA 92093-0085
Piervincenzo Rizzo
NDE & Structural Health Monitoring Laboratory, University of California–San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, M.C. 0085, La Jolla, CA 92093-0085
Stefano Coccia
NDE & Structural Health Monitoring Laboratory, University of California–San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, M.C. 0085, La Jolla, CA 92093-0085
Ivan Bartoli
NDE & Structural Health Monitoring Laboratory, University of California–San Diego, 9500 Gilman Drive, M.C. 0085, La Jolla, CA 92093-0085
Mahmood Fateh
Track Research Division, Federal Railroad Administration, 1120 Vermont Avenue NW, Mail Stop 20, Washington, DC 20590

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 31

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Numerical Simulations to Examine the Interaction of Train-Induced Guid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Critical Analysis of Train Derailments in Canada through Process Safet...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub