Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Exploratory Analysis of Crossing Difficulties for Blind and Sighted Pedestrians at Channelized Turn Lanes

Abstract

This paper presents the findings from a paired comparison study of blind and sighted pedestrians judging crossing opportunities in traffic from the roadside at three channelized turn lane (CTL) locations. It is motivated by the belief that the geometric nature of CTL facilities and the lack of signal control at the pedestrian crossing are factors that may negatively affect the delay and safety for blind pedestrians. Pedestrians waiting at the curb must judge the traffic moving in a circular motion, and they must deal with a significant amount of background traffic (i.e., noise) present at the main intersection. The findings show that crossings at all CTL crossing locations are significantly more difficult for blind pedestrians than for sighted pedestrians. Blind pedestrians tend to face a greater risk and a greater amount of delay. Furthermore, the research shows that conflicting traffic flow in the turn lane has a significant effect on crossing performance for both pedestrian groups; however, the effect of noise-generating background traffic on blind pedestrian crossings is not significant. The study also concludes that for this experiment the location of the crosswalk (in the center of the turn lane or at the downstream end) does not have a significant effect on crossing judgment performance.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Ashmead D. Guth D. Wall R. Long R. and Ponchillia P. Street Crossing by Sighted and Blind Pedestrians at a Modern Roundabout. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 131, No. 11, Nov. 1, 2005, pp. 812–821.
2. Wall R. Long R. Guth D. Ashmead D. and Ponchillia P. Roundabouts: Problems of and Strategies for Access. International Congress Series 1282. In Vision 2005. Proceedings of the International Congress, ICS 1282 (Jones S. Rubin G. and Hamlin D., eds.), Elsevier, London, April 2006.
3. Guth D. Ashmead D. Long R. Wall R. and Ponchillia P. Blind and Sighted Pedestrians’ Judgments of Gaps in Traffic at Roundabouts. Human Factors, Vol. 47, 2005, pp. 314–331.
4. Crossing Solutions at Roundabouts and Channelized Turn Lanes for Pedestrians with Vision Disabilities. NCHRP Project 3–78 (ongoing). Institute of Transportation Research and Education, Raleigh, N.C.
5. NCHRP Report 279: Intersection Channelization Guide. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1985.
6. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets, 4th ed. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 2001.
7. Synthesis on Channelized Right Turns at Intersections on Urban and Suburban Arterials. NCHRP Project 3–72. Midwest Research Institute, Kansas City, Mo., Dec. 2003.
8. Pedestrian Safety Guide and Countermeasure Selection System (PEDSAFE). Improved Right-Turn Slip-Lane Design. http://www.walkinginfo.org/pedsafe.
9. Devore J. L. Probability and Statistics for Engineering and the Sciences, 5th ed. Brooks/Cole, Pacific Grove, Calif., 2000.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Bastian J. Schroeder
Institute of Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601
Nagui M. Rouphail
Institute of Transportation Research and Education, North Carolina State University, Centennial Campus, Box 8601, Raleigh, NC 27695-8601
Robert S. Wall Emerson
Department of Blindness and Low Vision Studies, Western Michigan University, Mailstop 5218, 1903 West Michigan Avenue, Kalamazoo, MI 49008

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 49

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Disability and pedestrian road traffic injury: A scoping review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Usability evaluation of detectable warning surfaces in Quebec City (Ca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Blind and Sighted Pedestrians’ Road-Crossing Judgments at a Single-Lan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  4. Examining the Impact of “Quiet” Vehicles on the Performance of Orienta...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub