Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Improving Minnesota's Stratified Ramp Control Strategy

Abstract

Minnesota's most recent stratified zone ramp metering (SZM) strategy, the successor of the ZONE metering algorithm, has been deployed in the Minneapolis–St. Paul area since late 2002. The SZM strategy is intended to maximize freeway throughput while keeping ramp waiting times below a predetermined threshold. Preliminary evaluation results confirmed the overall effectiveness of the SZM strategy but also revealed that the freeway performance was compromised by the restrictive maximum ramp waiting constraint. Consequently, improvements were sought. These focus on a better determination of the minimum release rate for each ramp and its integration with the overall SZM strategy. Both the current and the enhanced SZM strategies are tested in two freeway sites under various demand scenarios through a state-of-the-art microscopic simulator. The simulation results indicate that the enhanced SZM strategy is effective for delaying and decreasing the freeway congestion and results in smoother freeway traffic flow compared with the original SZM strategy without violating the maximum ramp delay requirement.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Arnold E. D. Ramp Metering: A Review of the Literature. Report VTRC 99-TAR5. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, 1998.
2. Piotrowicz G. and Robinson J. Ramp Metering Status in North America, 1995 Update. Report DOT-T-95-17. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995.
3. Cambridge Systematics. Twin Cities Ramp Meter Evaluation. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2001.
4. Xin W. Michalopoulos P. G. Hourdakis J. and Lau D. Minnesota's New Ramp Control Strategy: Design Overview and Preliminary Assessment. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Record, No. 1867, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 69–79.
5. Hourdakis J. and Michalopoulos P. G. Evaluation of Ramp Control Effectiveness in Two Twin Cities Freeways. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Record, No. 1811, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 21–29.
6. Zhang M. Kim T. Nie X. Jin W. Chu L. and Recker W. Evaluation of On-Ramp Control Algorithms. UCB-ITS-PRR-2001-36. California PATH, Berkeley, 2001.
7. Lau R. Stratified Metering Algorithm. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 2001.
8. Beegala A. Hourdakis J. and Michalopoulos P. G. Methodology for Performance Optimization of Ramp Control Strategies Through Microsimulation. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1925, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 87–98.
9. Barceló J. Ferrer J. L. and Grau R. AIMSUN2 and the GETRAM Simulation Environment. Departamento de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, Facultad de Informática, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, Spain, 1994.
10. Koka M. Hourdakis J. and Michalopoulos P. G. Computer-Aided Testing and Evaluation of Adaptive Ramp Control Strategies. Presented at 79th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2000.
11. Hourdakis J. Michalopoulos P. G. and Kottommannil J. Practical Procedure for Calibrating Microscopic Traffic Simulation Models. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1852, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2003, pp. 130–139.
12. Theil H. Economic Forecasts and Policy. North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1961.
13. Garber N. J. and Gadiraju R. Factors Affecting Speed Variance and Its Influence on Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 1213, TRB, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 64–71.
14. Oh C. Oh J.-S. Ritchie S. G. and Chang M.-S. Real-Time Estimation of Freeway Accident Likelihood. Presented at 80th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2001.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Baichun Feng
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
John Hourdos
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.
Panos G. Michalopoulos
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Minnesota, 500 Pillsbury Drive SE, Minneapolis, MN 55455.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 23

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Statistical Evaluation of Ramp Metering for a Dual Free way Corridor
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Improving Queue Size Estimation for Minnesota's Stratified Zone Meteri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub