Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Resilient Modulus Estimation System for Fine-Grained Soils

Abstract

A software tool was developed to estimate the resilient modulus of finegrained subgrade soils. The subgrade resilient modulus is a key factor for use in mechanistic–empirical pavement design methods. However, for routine design use, the test method is too expensive and difficult to perform. Resilient modulus estimation software was developed with expert system approaches. Information entered by the user is first examined for reasonableness and accuracy. Then, data searching processes are initiated, and more than 30 estimation models can be invoked, depending on the availability of input data. All results were evaluated on the basis of certainty rules, such as how well data meet limitations existing during the model's original development environment. The user is given four alternate methods on which to base the choice of a resilient modulus that is most appropriate for the site: one based on certainty rules and three based on statistical methods.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Guide for Design of Pavement Structures. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1993.
2. Thickness Design–Asphalt Pavements for Highway and Street, 9th ed. Manual Series No. 1. Asphalt Institute, Lexington, Ky., 1981.
3. Seed H. B. Chan C. K. and Lee C. E. Resilience Characteristics of Subgrade Soils and Their Relation to Fatigue Failures in Asphalt Pavements. Proc., 1st International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavement, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1962, pp. 667–679.
4. Richardson D. N. Estimation of Fine-Grained Subgrade Resilient Modulus. Proc., 37th Annual UMR Asphalt Conference, University of Missouri, Rolla, 1994.
5. Thompson M. R. and Robnett Q. L. Resilient Properties of Subgrade Soils. Transportation Engineering Journal, Vol. 105, No. TE1, 1979, pp. 71–89.
6. Han Y.-P. Resilient Modulus Estimation System. PhD dissertation. University of Missouri, Rolla, 2005.
7. Porter O. J. Development of the Original Method for Highway Design. Proc., Symposium for Development of CBR Flexible Pavement Design for Airfields, American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 1949.
8. Heukelom W. and Klomp A. J. G. Dynamic Testing as a Means of Controlling Pavement During and After Construction. Proc., 1st International Conference on Structural Design of Asphalt Pavement, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 1962, pp. 667–679.
9. Green J. L. and Hall J. W. Nondestructive Vibratory Testing of Airport Pavements. Volume 1: Experimental Test Results and Development of Evaluation Methodology and Procedure. Technical Report S-75–14. U.S. Army Engineers Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1975.
10. Cardoso S. H. Subgrade Modulus Models Based on the Backcalculation of 2,200 Deflection Basins. Recent Developments in Soil and Pavement Mechanics: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Recent Developments in Soil and Pavement Mechanics, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 1997, pp. 343–349.
11. Witczak M. W. Qi X. and Mirza M. W. Use of Nonlinear Subgrade Modulus in AASHTO Design Procedure. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 121, No. 3 1995, pp. 273–282.
12. Lister N. W. and Powell W. D. Design Practice for Bituminous Pavement in the United Kingdom. Proc., 6th International Conference on the Structural Design of Asphalt Pavement, Vol. 1, Ann Arbor, Mich., 1987, pp. 220–231.
13. Cardoso S. H. and Witczak M. W. Permanent Deformation for Flexible Airfield Pavement Design. In Transportation Research Record 1307, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991, pp. 111–121.
14. Hopkins T. C. Minimum Bearing Strength of Soil Subgrades Required to Construct Flexible Pavements. Proc., 4th International Conference on the Bearing Capacity of Roads and Airfields, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Vol. 1, 1994, pp. 605–617.
15. Flexible Pavement Design Manual, Intermediate Report—Material Investigation and Construction Specification (Draft) (in Chinese). China Engineering Consultants, Inc., Taipei, Taiwan, 1997.
16. Yang Q. Z. Correlations between Resilient Modulus, CBR Value and R-Value (in Chinese). MS thesis. Tam-Kang University, Taipei, Taiwan, 1990.
17. Barker W. R. Prediction of Pavement Roughness. Miscellaneous Paper GL-82–11. U.S. Army Engineer Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1992.
18. Lotfi H. A. Schwartz C. W. and Witczak M. W. Compaction Specification for the Control of Subgrade Rutting. In Transportation Research Record 1196, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 108–115.
19. NCHRP 1-37A Guides for Mechanistic–Empirical of New and Rehabilitated Pavement Structures. Final Report, ARA, Inc., ERES Consultants Division, Champaign, Ill., 2004
20. Hveem F. N. and Carmay R. M. The Factors Underlying the Rational Design of Pavements. In Highway Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 28, 1948, pp. 101–136.
21. Hines C. R. Correlation of Subgrade Modulus and Stabilometer ‘R’ Values. Colorado Division of Highways, Denver, 1978.
22. Buu T. Correlation of Resistance R-Value and Resilient Modulus of Idaho Subgrade Soils. Idaho Department of Transportation, Division of Highways, Boise, 1980.
23. Farrar M. J. and Turner J. P. Resilient Modulus of Wyoming Subgrade Soils. MPC Report No. 91-1. Mountain Plains Consortium, Laramie, Wyo., 1991.
24. Thompson M. R. and Elliott R. P. Final Report—Resilient Properties of Subgrade Soils. Report FHWA-IL-UI-160. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1976.
25. Lee W. Bohra N. C. Altschaeffl A. G. and White T. D. Resilient Modulus of Cohesive Soils. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 123, No. 2 1997, pp. 131–135.
26. Jones M. P. and Witczak M. W. Subgrade Modulus on the San Diego Test Road. In Transportation Research Record 641, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1977, pp. 1–6.
27. Carmichael R. F. III and Stuart E. Predicting Resilient Modulus: A Study to Determine the Mechanical Properties of Subgrade Soils. In Transportation Research Record 1043, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1985, pp. 145–148.
28. Elliot R. P. Thornton S. I. Foo K. Y. Siew K. W. and Woodbridge R. Resilient Properties of Arkansas Subgrades. Report TRC-94. Arkansas Highway and Transportation Research Center, University of Arkansas, Fayetteville, 1988.
29. Drumm E. C. Boateng-Poku Y. and Pierce T. J. Estimation of Subgrade Resilient Modulus from Standard Tests. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 116, No. 5 1990, pp. 774–789.
30. Woolstrum G. Dynamic Testing of Nebraska Soils and Aggregates. In Transportation Research Record 1278, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1990, pp. 27–34.
31. Drumm E. C. Hudson J. Li Z. Madgett M. and Baker D. Resilient Response of Tennessee Subgrades—Volume 2: Handbook of Resilient Modulus and Index Properties. Report TN-RES1019-07-V2. University of Tennessee, Knoxville, 1993.
32. Santha B. L. Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils: Comparison of Two Constitutive Equations. In Transportation Research Record 1462, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 79–90.
33. Mohammad L. N. Huang B. Puppala A. J. and Allen A. Regression Model for Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1687, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1999, pp. 47–54.
34. Missouri Department of Transportation. Project Development Manual, Missouri Department of Transportation. Jefferson City, 2004.
35. British Highways Agency. Design Manual for Roads and Bridges. Volume 7: Pavement Design and Maintenance, Section 2: Pavement Design and Construction. British Highways Agency, London, 1994.
36. Yau A. and Von Quintus H. L. Study of LTPP Laboratory Resilient Modulus Test Data and Response Characteristics. Report FHWA-RD-02-051. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2002.
37. Van Vuuren D. J. Rapid Determination of CBR with the Portable Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. The Rhodesian Engineer, Vol. 7, No. 5 1968, pp. 852–854.
38. Kleyn E. G. The Use of the Dynamic Cone Penetrometer (DCP). Report 2/74. Transvaal Roads Department, Pretoria, South Africa, 1975.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Yuh-Puu Han
112 Butler-Carlton Hall, Department of Civil, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Rolla, 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla, MO 65409-0030.
Thomas M. Petry
129 Butler-Carlton Hall, Department of Civil, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Rolla, 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla, MO 65409-0030.
David N. Richardson
126 Butler-Carlton Hall, Department of Civil, Architecture and Environmental Engineering, University of Missouri, Rolla, 1870 Miner Circle, Rolla, MO 65409-0030.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 20

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub