Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Establishment of Precision of Dynamic Angle Validation Kit with Hot-Mix Simulator for Superpave Gyratory Compactors

Abstract

Superpave® hot-mix asphalt (HMA) specimens are compacted in the laboratory with the Superpave gyratory compactor (SGC) through the application of pressure and an applied angle of gyration. The original compaction specification for the SGC requires the angle of gyration to be 22 ± 0.35 mrad (1.25 ± 0.02 degrees), measured externally to the compaction mold. Questions concerning the ability of different compactors to produce HMA specimens of the same mix with the same density led to the development of the dynamic angle validation (DAV) kit, which measures the angle of gyration internally (on the inside of the mold). The DAV procedure requires the use of HMA to measure the internal angle of gyration. Because of practical limitations of performing measurements with HMA and questions concerning the proper HMA mix to use in the measurements, a companion device—the hot-mix simulator (HMS)—was introduced, which effectively simulates the load placed on the SGC by an HMA specimen when used in conjunction with the DAV. An interlaboratory study was conducted in accordance with ASTM E691–99 to establish the precision of the internal angle measurement provided by the DAV-HMS combination. A total of 10 DAV-HMS units and five SGC models were included in the study. Estimates were developed of both repeatability (within laboratory) and reproducibility (between laboratories) for the DAV-HMS device for all five SGC models.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cominsky R. Leahy R. B. and Harrigan E. T. Level One Mix Design: Materials Selection, Compaction, and Conditioning. Report SHRP-A-408. Strategic Highway Research Program, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
2. Al-Khateeb G. Paugh C. Stuart K. Harman T. and D'Angelo J. Target and Tolerance Study for Angle of Gyration Used in Superpave Gyratory Compactor. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 208–215.
3. Prowell B. D. Brown E. R. and Huner M. H. Evaluation of the Internal Angle of Gyration of Superpave Gyratory Compactors in Alabama. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 72, 2003.
4. Dalton F. Application of Internal Angle Verification to Obtain Equivalent Results from Various SGC Models. Pine Research Report 2001-01. Pine Instrument Company, Grove City, Pa., 2001.
5. Hall K. D. Ruggedness Evaluation of the Dynamic Angle Validation Kit for Superpave Gyratory Compactors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1891, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2004, pp. 198–202.
6. Hall K. D. Evaluating the Superpave Gyratory Compactor Internal Angle of Gyration Using Simulated Loading. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 74E, 2005.
7. Dalton F. Comparison of Two Internal Angle Measurement Devices for Superpave Gyratory Compactors. Report 2003-01, Revision A. Pine Instrument Company, Grove City, Pa., May 2003.
8. Hall K. D. and Easley T. Establishment of the Precision of a Rapid-Angle Measurement Device for Superpave Gyratory Compactors. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1929, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 97–103.
9. Hall K. D. Comparison of RAM and DAV-HMS. Minutes of July 2005 Meeting of the Expert Task Group (ETG) for Superpave Aggregates and Mixtures. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2005.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Kevin D. Hall
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Arkansas, 4190 Bell Engineering Center, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Tamara Easley
Research Section, Arkansas State Highway and Transportation Department, 10324 I-30, Little Rock, AR 72209.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub