Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Mechanical Mixture Simulation Devices for Determining and Calibrating Internal Angle of Gyration in Superpave Gyratory Compactor

Abstract

Since 1993, asphalt technologists have recognized the importance of maintaining a tight tolerance on the angle of gyration used in the Superpave® gyratory compactor. Small changes in angle were shown to affect significantly the percentage of air voids in a compacted mix specimen and, in the design phase, to affect the design asphalt binder content. Through the years since its implementation, there have been significant advancements in the understanding of the Superpave gyratory compactor. Implementation research indicated that the internal angle of gyration was the compaction parameter of importance and that it did not directly relate to the measured external angle of gyration. Continuing to seek improvements in reproducibility of test results, the industry developed several devices that mechanically simulate the stiffness of an asphalt mixture so that determination and calibration of the internal angle of gyration can be accomplished without the necessity of compacting mixture specimens. The purpose of this research was to improve the determination and subsequent calibration of the dynamic internal angle of gyration for the Superpave gyratory compactor by evaluating the use of the mechanical mixture simulation devices. The results of the research indicate that mechanical mixture simulation devices can be used to effectively determine and calibrate the internal angle of gyration. By streamlining and standardizing the process for determining and calibrating the internal angle, it is expected that the variation in the bulk specific gravity (or percentage of air voids) of a compacted mixture specimen between user agencies and producers will be significantly reduced.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Cominsky R. Leahy R. B. and Harrigan E. T. SHRP Report A-408. Level One Mix Design: Materials Selection, Compaction, and Conditioning. Strategic Highway Research Program, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
2. Harman T. Bukowski J. R. Moutier F. Huber G. and McGennis R. History and Future Challenges of Gyratory Compaction: 1939 to 2001. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 200–207.
3. Harman T. D'Angelo J. Bukowski J. and Paugh C. Comparison of Superpave Gyratory Compactors by FHWA Mobile Asphalt Laboratories—Nine Production Mixes. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1995.
4. Al-Khateeb G. Paugh C. Stuart K. Harman T. and D'Angelo J. Target and Tolerance Study for Angle of Gyration Used in Superpave Gyratory Compactor. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1789, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2002, pp. 208–215.
5. Hall K. D. Evaluating the Superpave Gyratory Compactor Internal Angle of Gyration Using Simulated Loading. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 74E, 2005.
6. Guler M. Bahia H. U. Bosscher P. J. and Plesha M. E. Device for Measuring Shear Resistance of Hot-Mix Asphalt in Gyratory Compactor. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1723, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2000, pp. 116–124.
7. Bahia H. Masad E. Stakston A. Dessouky S. and Bayomy F. Simplistic Mixture Design Using the SGC and the DSR. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 72, 2003.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

R. Michael Anderson
Asphalt Institute, 2696 Research Park Drive, Lexington, KY 40511-8480.
Kevin D. Hall
University of Arkansas, 4190 Bell Engineering Center, Fayetteville, AR 72701.
Michael Huner
Asphalt Institute, 1191 W. Main St., Franklin, TN 37064-3119.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 9

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub