Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Transitioning from Texas Gyratory Compactor to Superpave Gyratory Compactor

Abstract

The Strategic Highway Research Program expended great effort in developing the Superpave® gyratory compactor (SGC) as a modern, technologically advanced tool for the design of hot-mix asphalt (HMA) paving mixtures and for preparation of realistic test specimens for laboratory evaluation. Since the widely accepted SGC was designed to produce specimens similar to actual pavement layers and since the current series of Texas Department of Transportation (TxDOT) HMA paving mixtures have demonstrated acceptable performance, TxDOT wished to replace the Texas gyratory compactor (TGC) with the SGC for the design of its current repertoire of dense-graded mixtures. In the first phase of this study, the authors developed a specification for the number of design gyrations with the SGC to achieve the same optimum asphalt content (OAC) as that obtained with the TGC. However, on the basis of past experience, review of the literature, and feedback from TxDOT, the design OAC was considered to be too low; mixtures that may be susceptible to fatigue cracking resulted. To mitigate this problem, the authors revised the specification for use of the SGC so that the resulting mixtures had an increased OAC. This revision was done by comparing the rutting resistance of HMA mixtures designed at different numbers of gyrations with the Hamburg wheel-tracking device and then selecting the lowest number of gyrations that did not compromise rutting resistance of the mixture. Results show that it is possible to select a considerably lower number of design gyrations with the SGC without a significant decrease in rutting performance of the mixtures.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Button J. W. Little D. N. Jagadam V. and Pendleton O. J. Correlation of Selected Laboratory Compaction Methods with Field Compaction. In Transportation Research Record 1454, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 193–201.
2. Von Quintus H. Scherocman J. A. Hughes C. W. and Kennedy T. W. NCHRP Report 338: Asphalt-Aggregate Mixture Analysis System—AAMAS. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1991.
3. Izzo R. P. Evaluation of Texas Department of Transportation Type A Mix Based on the Superpave Gyratory Compactor. Materials and Tests Branch, Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 1999.
4. Aschenbrener T. and Currier G. Influence of Testing Variables on the Results from the Hamburg Wheel-Tracking Device. Report CDOT-DTD-R-93-22. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 1993.
5. Maupin G. W. Additional Asphalt to Increase the Durability of Virginia's Superpave Surface Mixes. Report FHWA/VTRC 03–R15. Virginia Transportation Research Council, Charlottesville, Va., 2003.
6. Aschenbrener T. and Harmelink D. In-Place Voids Monitoring of Hot Mix Asphalt Pavements. Report CDOT-DTD-R-2002–11. Colorado Department of Transportation, Denver, 2002.
7. Section 224—-Superpave Bituminous Concrete Base, Binder, and Wearing Surface Layers. Alabama Standard Specifications. Alabama Department of Transportation, Montgomery, 2003.
8. Brown E. R. and Mallick R. B. An Initial Evaluation of N-design Superpave Gyratory Compactor. Journal of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists, Vol. 67, 1998, pp. 101–124.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Joe W. Button
Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135.
Arif Chowdhury
Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135.
Amit Bhasin
Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 3135 TAMU, College Station, TX 77843-3135.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 25

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Feasibility of using a physics engine to virtually compact asphalt mix...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. A Performance-based Evaluation of Superpave Design Gyrations for High ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub