Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Benefits of Campus Transit Pass: Study of Students’ Willingness to Pay for Proposed Mandatory Transit Pass Program

Abstract

The problem of estimating the expected net benefits of an unlimited-access campus transit pass, which would also fund an increase in critically needed services, is an example of the problem of estimating the value of a public good. Students at Western Washington University in Bellingham, Washington, used a referendum-format contingent valuation survey to measure students’ willingness to pay (WTP) for a mandatory transit pass. Responses by 935 students (a 44.7% response rate) were analyzed with censored logistic regression and revealed a mean WTP of $32.08 per academic quarter (corrected for estimated self-selection bias) for the proposed program. The program could actually be provided by contract with the local transit agency for $20.00 per student per quarter. Thus the estimated net benefit per student per quarter is $12.59, or $428,624 across the campus population. On-campus residents and those who commute via bus or bicycle showed higher WTP. WTP was substantially lower for those who live more than 10 mi from campus. Frequencies of “yes” votes showed majorities supporting the pass up to the $35.00 per quarter fee level, and strong majorities up to the $20.00 level, suggesting the proposal would pass easily by a student vote. Content analysis of reasons given for support, lack of it, or indecision showed that students were persuaded by nighttime bus service, safety, monetary savings, and environmental benefits. Doubts were raised by the mandatory nature of the proposed fee, services not meeting needs, and opposition to more student fees.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Toor W. and Havlick S. Transportation and Sustainable Campus Communities: Issues, Examples, Solutions. Island Press, Washington, D.C., 2004.
2. Remsen D. Dexter R. and Tollefson K. Transportation Planning. Western Washington University Student Report. Western Washington University, Bellingham, Wash., 1999. www.ac.wwu.edu/∼sustwwu/trans/remsen/transp.toc.html. Accessed February 2005.
3. Brown J. Hess D. and Shoup D. Unlimited Access. Transportation, Vol. 28, No. 3 2001, pp. 233–267.
4. Miller J. H. TCRP Synthesis 39: Transportation on College and University Campuses: A Synthesis of Transit Practice. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2001.
5. Transpo Group, Inc. WWU Origin-Destination Survey Findings. Report prepared for Western Washington University. Transpo Group, Inc., Kirkland, Wash., 2004.
6. Poinsatte F. and Toor W. Finding a New Way: Campus Transportation for the Twenty-first Century. University of Colorado Environmental Center, Boulder, Colo., 1999.
7. Litman T. and Lovegrove G. UBC TREK Program Evaluation: Costs, Benefits and Equity Impacts of a University TDM Program. Victoria Transport Policy Institute, Victoria, B.C., 1999. www.vtpi.org/utrek.pdf. Accessed February 2005.
8. Carson R. T. Flores N. E. and Meade N. F. Contingent Valuation: Controversies and Evidence, Environmental and Resource Economics, Vol. 19, No. 2 2001, pp. 173–210.
9. Mitchell R. C. and Carson R. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods: The Contingent Valuation Method. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 1989.
10. Cameron T. A. A New Paradigm for Valuing Non-market Goods Using Referendum Data: Maximum Likelihood Estimation by Censored Logistic Regression. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 15, No. 3 1988, pp. 355–379.
11. Patterson D. A. and Duffield J. W. Comment on Cameron's Censored Logistic Regression Model for Referendum Data. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Vol. 20, No. 3 1991, pp. 275–283.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Gene Myers
Department of Environmental Studies, Huxley College of the Environment, Mailstop 9085, Estu 471, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225.
Daniel A. Hagen
Department of Economics, Mailstop 9074, Estu 471, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225.
Tony Russo
Campus Planning Studio, Estu 471, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225.
Cari McMullin
Campus Planning Studio, Estu 471, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225.
Andrew Lembrick
Campus Planning Studio, Estu 471, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225.
Brianne Silbaugh
Campus Planning Studio, Estu 471, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225.
Kyle Parker
Campus Planning Studio, Estu 471, Western Washington University, Bellingham, WA 98225.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 110

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. No free rides: Winners and losers of the proposed Toronto Transit Comm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Microeconomic Model for Designing Public Transit Incentive Programs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub