Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Development of an Intersection Prioritization Tool for Accessible Pedestrian Signal Installation

Abstract

Although increased complexity in intersection design and signal timing has improved intersection service to vehicle traffic, it has created additional challenges to pedestrians who are blind or who have low vision. Safe and independent crossings for pedestrians who are blind or who have low vision may require installation of accessible pedestrian signals (APSs) at some complex signalized intersections. APSs provide an audible and sometimes a tactile indication when the walk signal is on to cross the street. The goal of this study was to create a tool to prioritize locations for the installation of APS. To develop the prioritization tool, various characteristics of the intersection and the individual crosswalk were assigned point values that indicated their relative effect on the need for an APS at the crosswalk. For example, a point is assigned if the crossing is interrupted by a median; two points are assigned if there is a channelized turn lane. Field tests were conducted in which sites were ranked in order of their need for APS. The rankings were done separately by transportation engineers using the prioritization tool and by expert judgment of orientation and mobility specialists and pedestrians with visual impairments. The point values of the prioritization tool were modified on the basis of the expert judgment rankings. The final calibrated tool provides practitioners with the means to take observable characteristics of a pedestrian crossing and produce a score that reflects the relative crossing difficulty for pedestrians who are blind, thus enabling prioritization of APS installations.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Barlow J. M., Bentzen B. L., and Tabor L. NCHRP Research Results Digest 278: Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Synthesis and Guide to Best Practice. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., Aug. 2003.
2. Draft Public Rights-of-Way Accessibility Guidelines. U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board (Access Board), Washington, D.C., Nov. 23, 2005. www.access-board.gov/prowac/draft.htm. Accessed Oct. 26, 2006.
3. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (with Revision No. 1). FHWA, Washington, D.C., Nov. 2003. mutcd.fhwa.dot.gov/HTM/2003r1/html-index.htm. Accessed Oct. 26, 2006.
4. Gallagher B. R., and de Oca P. Guidelines for Assessing the Need for Adaptive Devices for Visually Impaired Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections. Journal of Visual Impairment and Blindness, Vol. 92, 1998, pp. 633–646.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Daniel L. Carter
University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 730 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Campus Box 3430, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
David L. Harkey
University of North Carolina Highway Safety Research Center, 730 Martin Luther King Jr. Boulevard, Campus Box 3430, Chapel Hill, NC 27599.
Janet M. Barlow
Accessible Design for the Blind, 440 Hardendorf Avenue, NE, Atlanta, GA 30307.
Billie Louise Bentzen
Accessible Design for the Blind, P.O. Box 1212, Berlin, MA 01503.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 37

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub