Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Effect of Device Features

Abstract

The U.S. Access Board's Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way recommends the use of push-button-integrated accessible pedestrian signals (APSs). This research compared the effect of specific features of push-button-integrated APSs on the ability of blind pedestrians to locate and correctly use push buttons and to cross accurately during the pedestrian phase. A rapid-tick walk signal promoted the fastest onset of crossing compared with speech messages and bird calls and is therefore the preferred signal. However, speech walk indications are needed where two APSs are mounted on the same pole. Although variations in the standard features made little difference to users who were thoroughly familiar with devices, empirical evidence from participants with less knowledge of the devices as well as subjective data lead to the recommendation that APS devices include a push-button locator tone, a rounded push button with an activation tone or message, a tactile arrow incorporated into the push button, responsiveness to ambient sound, and a push-button information message and beaconing in response to an extended button press.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Draft Guidelines for Accessible Public Rights-of-Way. U.S. Architectural and Transportation Barriers Compliance Board, Washington, D.C., 2002.
2. Scott A. C., Myers L., Barlow J. M., and Bentzen B. L. Accessible Pedestrian Signals: The Effect of Push-Button Location and Audible “Walk” Indications on Pedestrian Behavior. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 1939, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D.C., 2005, pp. 69–76.
3. Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices for Streets and Highways. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2003.
4. Barlow J. M., Bentzen B. L., Bond T., and Gubbe D. Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Effect on Safety and Independence of Pedestrians Who Are Blind. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
5. Wall R. S., Ashmead D. H., Bentzen B. L., and Barlow J. M. Directional Guidance from Audible Pedestrian Signals for Street Crossing. Ergonomics, Vol. 47, No. 12, 2004, pp. 1318–1338.
6. Barlow J. M., Bentzen B. L., and Tabor L. Accessible Pedestrian Signals: Synthesis and Guide to Best Practice. Accessible Design for the Blind, Berlin, Mass., 2003.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Billie Louise Bentzen
Accessible Design for the Blind, P.O. Box 1212, Berlin, MA 01503.
Alan C. Scott
Department of Psychology, Boston College, 140 Commonwealth Avenue, Chestnut Hill, MA 02467.
Janet M. Barlow
Accessible Design for the Blind, 440 Hardendorf Avenue, NE, Atlanta, GA, 30307.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 42

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Evaluation of three pedestrian phasing with audible pedestrian signals...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. FeetBack: Providing Haptic Directional Cues Through a Shape-changing F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Virtual Guide Dog: Next-generation pedestrian signal for the visually ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Beaconing Signalization Substantially Reduces Blind Pedestrians’ Veer ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Accessible Pedestrian Signals at Complex Intersections...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub