Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 2006

Sidepath Safety Model: Bicycle Sidepath Design Factors Affecting Crash Rates

Abstract

The Florida Department of Transportation has sponsored a project to create a method for determining what bicycle facility types provide the best mobility for bicyclists. This project includes, as a component, developing a model that predicts the relative bicycle and motor vehicle crash rates between on-street facilities and shared-use paths located adjacent to a roadway (sidepaths). This paper describes how this sidepath safety model was developed and how it provides important guidance for bicycle facility type selection and sidepath design. The model was developed using operational and geometric data, user counts, and crash data for 21 roadway sections throughout Florida. Four determining factors were found to be significant and are included in the model: sidepath width (possibly a surrogate for user speed), separation of the sidepath from the roadway, posted speed of the roadway, and number of lanes on the adjacent roadway. The sidepath safety model R2 value is .81. The sidepath safety model also serves to quantify some of the concerns expressed in the AASHTO Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. Using this model, transportation planners and engineers will be able to test alternative design treatments to find the safest one for bicyclists. They will also be able to review existing sidepaths that have crash problems to identify potential solutions. This model provides an important new tool for transportation professionals to use when deciding on and designing bicycle facilities.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1999.
2. Kaplan J. Characteristics of the Regular Adult Bicycle User. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 1975.
3. Moritz W. Adult Bicyclists in the United States—Characteristics and Riding Experience in 1996. In Transportation Research Record 1636, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1998, pp. 1–7.
4. Wachtel A., and Lewiston D. Risk Factors for Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Collisions at Intersections. ITE Journal, Sept. 1994, pp. 30–35.
5. Räsänen M. How to Decrease the Number of Bicycle Accidents? A Research Based on Accidents Studied by Road Accident Investigation Teams and Planning Guides of Four Cities. Finnish Motor Insurer's Centre, Traffic Safety Committee of Insurance Companies. VALT. Helsinki, Finland, 1995.
6. Pasanen E., and Räsänen M. Cycling Risks in the City of Helsinki, English Summary. Helsinki City Planning Department, Helsinki, Finland, 1999.
7. Summala H., Pasanen E., Räsänen M., and Sievänen J. Bicycle Accidents and Drivers’ Visual Search at Left and Right Turns. Accident Analysis and Prevention, Vol. 28, No. 2, 1996, pp. 147–153.
8. Oregon Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan. Oregon Department of Transportation, Salem, 1995.
9. Florida Bicycle Facilities Planning and Design Handbook. FDOT, Tallahassee, 2001.
10. Barsotti E. Sidepath Suitability Score. League of Illinois Bicyclists, Aurora, April 3, 2001.
11. Neufeld R., and Musser T. Tech Sheet No. 1: Sidepath Bicycle Facilities. Chicagoland Bicycle Federation Chicago, Ill., 1997.
12. Trail Intersection Design Handbook. FDOT, Tallahassee, 1996.
13. Minnesota Bicycle Transportation Planning and Design Guidelines. Minnesota Department of Transportation, St. Paul, 1998.
14. Sign up for the Bike: Design Manual for a Cycle-Friendly Infrastructure, 2nd ed. Record 10, Centre for Research and Contract Standardization in Civil and Traffic Engineering (C.R.O.W.), Netherlands, 1994.
15. Jensen S. U., Andersen T., Hansen W., Kjærgaard E., Krag T., Larsen J. E., la Cour Lund B., and Thost P. Collection of Cycle Concepts. Road Directorate, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2000.
16. London Cycle Network Design Manual. Royal Borough of Kingston upon Thames, Kingston upon Thames, Surrey, United Kingdom, 1998.
17. Birriel E., Pernia J. C., Lu J. J., and Petritsch T. A. The Operational Characteristics of In-Line Skaters. University of South Florida, Tampa, Jan. 2001.
18. Landis B. W., Petritsch T. A., and Huang H. F. Characteristics of Emerging Road and Trail Users and Their Safety. Publication FHWA-HRT-04-103. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., Oct. 2004.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 2006
Issue published: January 2006

Rights and permissions

© 2006 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Theodore A. Petritsch
Sprinkle Consulting, Inc., 18115 US 41 North, Suite 600, Lutz, FL 33549.
Bruce W. Landis
Sprinkle Consulting, Inc., 18115 US 41 North, Suite 600, Lutz, FL 33549.
Herman F. Huang
Sprinkle Consulting, Inc., 18115 US 41 North, Suite 600, Lutz, FL 33549.
Srikalyan Challa
Sprinkle Consulting, Inc., 18115 US 41 North, Suite 600, Lutz, FL 33549.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 130

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 11

  1. Factors impacting bike crash severity in urban areas
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Staged Transition Process from Driving to Bicycling Based on the Effec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A review of factors and benefits of non-motorized transport: a way for...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Bicycle crash contributory factors: A systematic review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Analysis of Bicycle-Motor Vehicle Crashes in San Antonio, Texas
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Explore effects of bicycle facilities and exposure on bicycle safety a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Impact of Cognitive Distractions on Drivers’ Hazardous Event Anticipat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. A model with a solution algorithm for the improvement of an existing b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Predicting Biker Density at Bikeshare Station Intersections in San Fra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. How bicycle level of traffic stress correlate with reported cyclist ac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Commuting by Bicycle: An Overview of the Literature
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub