Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online May 14, 2018

Validation of an Agent-based Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation Model at the Pedestrian Walkway of Brooklyn Bridge

Abstract

The objective of this study is to validate a recently developed agent-based pedestrian simulation model, using data collected at the pedestrian walkway of Brooklyn Bridge. Video data were collected at the walkway and the trajectories of 294 pedestrians were extracted using computer vision. A genetic algorithm was applied to identify the optimum model parameters that minimize the error between the simulated and the actual trajectories of the calibration dataset. The simulation model was then applied to reproduce the trajectories of 214 pedestrians, considered for validation. The validation results showed that the model was capable of producing pedestrian trajectories with high accuracy, as the average location error between actual and simulated trajectories was for 0.32 m, while the average speed error was 0.06 m/s. Macroscopic results of the model were assessed by comparing the density–speed relationship in both actual data and the simulation. Finally, the accuracy of the model in reproducing the actual behavior of pedestrians during different interactions was evaluated. Results showed that the model was capable of handling these interactions with high accuracy, ranged between 79% and 100%.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Helbing D. Social Self-Organization: Agent-Based Simulations and Experiments to Study Emergent Social Behavior. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, 2012.
2. Hussein M., Sayed T. A Uni-Directional Agent Based Pedestrian Microscopic Model. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 42, No. 12, 2015, pp. 1114–1124.
3. Hussein M., Sayed T. A Bi-Directional Agent Based Pedestrian Microscopic Model. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 13, No. 4, 2017, pp. 326–355.
4. Hussein M., Sayed T. Microscopic Pedestrian Interaction Behavior Analysis Using Gait Parameters. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2519: 28–38.
5. Hussein M., Sayed T. Validation of an Agent-Based Microscopic Pedestrian Simulation Model at a Scramble Phase Signalized Intersection. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2661: 30–42.
6. Helbing D., Molnar P. Social Force Model for Pedestrian Dynamics. Physical Review E, Vol. 51, No. 5, 1995, pp. 4282–4286.
7. Blue V. J., Adler J. L. Cellular Automata Microsimulation of Bidirectional Pedestrian Flows. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1999. 1678: 135–141.
8. Xi H., Lee S., Son Y. J. An Integrated Pedestrian Behavior Model Based on Extended Decision Field Theory and Social Force Model. In Human-in-the-Loop Simulations, Springer, London, 2011, pp. 69–95.
9. Schadschneider A. Cellular Automaton Approach to Pedestrian Dynamics-Theory. arXiv preprint cond-mat/0112117, 2002.
10. Sarmady S., Haron F., Talib A. Z. Simulating Crowd Movements Using Fine Grid Cellular Automata. Proc., 12th International Conference on Computer Modelling and Simulation (UKSim), Cambridge, IEEE, New York, 2010, pp. 428–433.
11. Hoogendoorn S. P., Bovy P. H. L. Pedestrian Route-Choice and Activity Scheduling Theory and Models. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 38, No. 2, 2004, pp. 169–190.
12. Wong S. C., Leung W. L., Chan S. H., Lam W. H., Yung N. H., Liu C. Y., Zhang P. Bidirectional Pedestrian Stream Model with Oblique Intersecting Angle. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 3, 2010, pp. 234–242.
13. Robin Th., Antonini G., Bierlaire M., Cruz J. Specification, Estimation and Validation of a Pedestrian Walking Behavior Model. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2009, pp. 36–56.
14. Helbing D., Farkas I. J., Molnar P., Vicsek T. Simulation of Pedestrian Crowds in Normal and Evacuation Situations. Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, Vol. 21, No. 2, 2002, pp. 21–58.
15. Batty M., Desyllas J., Duxbury E. Safety in Numbers? Modelling Crowds and Designing Control for the Notting Hill Carnival. Urban Studies, Vol. 40, No. 8, 2003, pp. 1573–1590.
16. Klüpfel H. The Simulation of Crowds at Very Large Events. In Traffic and Granular Flow’05 (Schadschneider A., Pöschel T., Kühne R., Schreckenberg M., Wolf W., eds.), Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2007, pp. 341–346.
17. Berrou J. L., Beecham J., Quaglia P., Kagarlis M. A., Gerodimos A. Calibration and Validation of the Legion Simulation Model Using Empirical Data. In Pedestrian and Evacuation Dynamics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005, pp. 167–181.
18. Yue Z., Jiangyan W., Huang D., Shengyang S. U. N. Pedestrian Simulation Modeling for World Expo 2010 Shanghai. Journal of Transportation Systems Engineering and Information Technology, Vol. 9, No. 2, 2009, pp. 141–146.
19. Monteleone M., Veraart N., Chough S., Aviles W. Pedestrian Simulation Modeling Study for World Trade Center Memorial. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2008. 2073: 49–57.
20. Pretto C. O., Cybis H. B. B., Jacobsen A. A Multi-layer Simulation Model for Vehicle and Pedestrian Interaction. Presented at 90th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
21. Kim I., Galiza R., Ferreira L. Modeling Pedestrian Queuing Using Micro-Simulation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 232–240.
22. Shiwakoti N., Sarvi M., Rose G. Modelling Pedestrian Behaviour Under Emergency Conditions–State-of-the-art and Future Directions. In 31st Australasian Transport Research Forum, Australia, 2008, pp. 457–473.
23. Pan X. Computational Modeling of Human and Social Behaviors for Emergency Egress Analysis. Doctoral dissertation, Stanford University, 2006.
24. Zhou S., Chen D., Cai W., Luo L., Low M. Y. H., Tian F., Tay V. S. H., Ong D. W. S., Hamilton B. D. Crowd Modeling and Simulation Technologies. ACM Transactions on Modeling and Computer Simulation (TOMACS), Vol. 20, No. 4, 2010, p. 20.
25. Duives D. C., Daamen W., Hoogendoorn S. P. State-of-the-art Crowd Motion Simulation Models. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 37, 2013, pp. 193–209.
26. NYCdot [Online]. http://www.nyc.gov. Accessed July 17, 2017.
27. Ismail K., Sayed T., Saunier N. A Methodology for Precise Camera Calibration for Data Collection Applications in Urban Traffic Scenes. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2013, pp. 57–67.
28. Saunier N., Sayed T. A Feature-Based Tracking Algorithm for Vehicles in Intersections. Proc., 3rd Canadian Conference on Computer and Robot Vision, Québec, IEEE, New York, 2006, p. 59.
29. Golberg D. E. Genetic Algorithms in Search, Optimization, and Machine Learning. Addion Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1989.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: May 14, 2018
Issue published: December 2018

Rights and permissions

© National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2018.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohamed Hussein
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
Tarek Sayed
Department of Civil Engineering, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

Notes

Address correspondence to Mohamed Hussein: [email protected]

Author Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Hussein and Sayed; data collection: Hussein and Sayed; analysis and interpretation of results: Hussein and Sayed; draft manuscript preparation: Hussein and Sayed. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 315

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 5

  1. Assuring Quality of Pedestrian Behavior Results Derived From Simulatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Behavioral-Based Pedestrian Modeling Approach: Formulation, Sensitivit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Modeling the interactions of pedestrians and cyclists in mixed flow co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Microscopic behavioural analysis of cyclist and pedestrian interaction...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text