Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online January 24, 2019

Integrated Safety and Operational Analysis of the Access Design of Managed Toll Lanes

Abstract

Managed lanes (MLs) have been implemented as a vital strategy for traffic management and traffic safety improvement. The majority of previous studies involving MLs have adopted a limited scope of examining the effect of MLs segments as a whole, without considering the safety and operational effects of the design of access to the MLs. In the study, several scenarios were tested using microscopic traffic simulation to determine the optimal access design while taking into consideration accessibility levels and weaving lengths. The studied accessibility levels varied from one to three along the studied network. Both safety (i.e., speed standard deviation, time-to-collision, and conflict rate) and operation (i.e., level of service, average speed, average delay) performance measures were included in the analysis. Tobit models were developed for investigating the factors that affect the safety measures. ANOVA and LOS calculations were used to evaluate traffic operation. The results of the safety and operational analysis suggested that one accessibility level is the optimal option in the nine-mile network. A weaving length between 1,000 feet and 1,400 feet per lane change was suggested based on the safety analysis. In addition, from the operation perspective, a weaving length between 1,000 feet and 2,000 feet per lane change was recommended. The results also showed that off-peak periods had better safety and operational performance (e.g., lower conflict rate, less delay) than peak periods. This study has major implications for improving MLs by recommending the optimal accessibility level and weaving length near access zones.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Perez B. G., Fuhs C., Gants C., Giordano R., Ungemah D. H. Priced Managed Lane Guide. FHWA-HOP-13-007. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2012.
2. Kuhn B. Efficient Use of Highway Capacity Summary. FHWA-HOP-10-023. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA, Washington, D.C., 2010.
3. Freeway Management Program. FHWA. https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freewaymgmt/managed_lanes.htm. Accessed July 2017.
4. Saad M., Abdel-Aty M., Lee J. Analysis of Driving Behavior at Expressway Toll Plazas. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, in press, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2017.12.008.
5. Saad M. Analysis of Driving Behavior at Expressway Toll Plazas using Driving Simulator. Master Thesis. University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL, 2016.
6. Chung C. L. A Review and Advance of High-Occupancy Toll Lanes’ Toll Schemes. Journal of the Eastern Asia Society for Transportation Studies, Vol. 10, 2013, pp. 240–259.
8. Burris M. W., Brady J. F. Unrevealed Preferences: Unexpected Traveler Response to Pricing on Managed Lanes. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, advance online publication.
9. Abuzwidah M., Abdel-Aty M. Effects of Using High Occupancy Vehicle Lanes on Safety Performance of Freeways. Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017.
11. Fitzpatrick K., Brewer M. A., Chrysler S., Wood N., Kuhn B., Goodin G., Fuhs C., Ungemah D., Perez B., Dewey V. Guidelines for Implementing Managed Lanes, Project No. 15-49. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2017.
12. Fuhs C. A. High-Occupancy Vehicle Facilities: A Planning, Design, and Operation Manual. William Barclay Parsons Fellowship, Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., Orange, CA, 1990.
13. Caltrans. California Department of Transportation. Updated Managed Lane Design: Traffic Operations Policy Directive 11-02.Caltrans, Sacramento, CA, 2011.
14. Jang K., Chung K., Ragland D., Chan C.-Y. Safety Performance of High-Occupancy-Vehicle Facilities: Evaluation of HOV Lane Configurations in California. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2099: 132–140.
15. Burgess C. HOT Lane Buffer and Mid-Point Access Design Review Report. Washington State Department of Transportation, Olympia, WA, 2006.
16. Cai Q., Saad M., Abdel-Aty M., Yuan J., Lee J. Safety Impact of Weaving Distance on Freeway Facilities with Managed Lanes using Both Microscopic Traffic and Driving Simulations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, advance online publication.
17. Venglar S., Fenno D., Goel S., Schrader P. Managed Lanes-Traffic Modeling. FHWA/TX-02/4160-4. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, TX, 2002.
18. Machumu K. S., Sando T., Mtoi E., Chimba D., Kwigizile V. Simulation-Based Determination of the Minimum Routing Decision Distance for Managed Lanes: Case Study of I-295 in Jacksonville, Florida. Presented at 96th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2017.
19. Wang L., Abdel-Aty M., Lee J. Implementation of Active Traffic Management Strategies for Safety of a Congested Expressway Weaving Segment. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2635: 28–35.
20. Shalaby A., Abdulhai B., Lee J. Assessment of Streetcar Transit Priority Options using Microsimulation Modelling. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 30, No. 6, 2003, pp. 1000–1009.
21. Jin X., Hossan M. S., Asgari H. Investigating the Value of Time and Value of Reliability for Managed Lanes. Florida Department of Transportation, Tallahassee, FL, 2015.
22. Sajjadi S., Kondyli A. Macroscopic and Microscopic Analyses of Managed Lanes on Freeway Facilities in South Florida. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), Vol. 4, No. 1, 2017, pp. 61–70.
23. Koppula N. A Comparative Analysis of Weaving Areas in Hcm, Transims, Corsim, Vissim and Integration. Doctoral dissertation, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, VA, 2002.
24. Zhizhou W., Jian S., Xiaoguang Y. Calibration of VISSIM for Shanghai Expressway using Genetic Algorithm. Proc., Winter Simulation Conference, 2005, Orlando, FL, IEEE, New York, NY, 2005.
25. Saad M., Abdel-Aty M., Lee J., Wang L. Determining the Optimal Access Design of Managed Lanes considering Dynamic Pricing. Proc., 18th International Conference Road Safety on Five Continents (RS5C 2018), Jeju Island, South Korea, Statens väg-och transportforskningsinstitut, 2018.
26. Dowling R., Skabardonis A., Alexiadis V. Traffic Analysis Toolbox Volume III: Guidelines for Applying Traffic Microsimulation Modeling Software. FHWA-HRT-04-040. Federal Highway Administration, Washington, D.C., 2004.
27. Yu R., Abdel-Aty M. An Optimal Variable Speed Limits System to Ameliorate Traffic Safety Risk. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 46, 2014, pp. 235–246.
28. Rahman M. S., Abdel-Aty M., Wang L., Lee J. Understanding the Highway Safety Benefits of Different Approaches of Connected Vehicles in Reduced Visibility Conditions. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, advance online publication.
29. Ekram A.-A., Rahman M. S. Effects of Connected and Autonomous Vehicles on Contraflow Operations for Emergency Evacuation: a Microsimulation Study. Presented at 97th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2018.
30. Gettman D., Pu L., Sayed T., Shelby S. G. Surrogate Safety Assessment Model and Validation: Final Report. FHWA-HRT-08-051. Federal Highway Administration, Mclean, VA, 2008.
31. Sayed T., Zein S. Traffic Conflict Standards for Intersections. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 22, No. 4, 1999, pp. 309–323.
32. Wu Y., Abdel-Aty M., Park J., Zhu J. Effects of Crash Warning Systems on Rear-End Crash Avoidance Behavior under Fog Conditions. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 95, 2018, pp. 481–492.
33. Shahdah U., Saccomanno F., Persaud B. Integrated Traffic Conflict Model for Estimating Crash Modification Factors. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 71, 2014, pp. 228–235.
34. Saleem T., Persaud B., Shalaby A., Ariza A. Can Microsimulation Be Used to Estimate Intersection Safety? Case Studies using VISSIM and Paramics. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2014. 2432: 142–148.
35. Highway Capacity Manual 2010. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 2010.
36. Rahman M. S., Abdel-Aty M. Longitudinal Safety Evaluation of Connected Vehicles’ Platooning on Expressways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 381–391.
37. Yue L., Abdel-Aty M., Wu Y., Wang L. Assessment of the Safety Benefits of Vehicles’ Advanced Driver Assistance, Connectivity and Low Level Automation Systems. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 117, 2018, pp. 55–64.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: January 24, 2019
Issue published: February 2019

Rights and permissions

© National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2019.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Moatz Saad
Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Mohamed Abdel-Aty
Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Jaeyoung Lee
Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
Ling Wang
Department of Civil, Environmental & Construction Engineering, University of Central Florida, Orlando, FL
College of Transportation Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai, PRC

Notes

Address correspondence to Moatz Saad: [email protected]

Author Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design: Moatz Saad, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, and Ling Wang; simulation and data collection: Moatz Saad; analysis and interpretation of results: Moatz Saad, Mohamed Abdel-Aty; draft manuscript preparation: Moatz Saad, Mohamed Abdel-Aty, and Jaeyoung Lee. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 262

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 4

  1. Multi-vehicle safety functions for freeway weaving segments using lane...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Leveraging Location-Based Data for Assessing Network-Level Traffic Imp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Regional traffic operation and vehicle emission impact assessment of l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Applying machine learning approaches to analyze the vulnerable road-us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text