Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online February 5, 2019

Analyzing Bus Passengers’ Satisfaction in Dhaka using Discrete Choice Models

Abstract

The bus transport system in Dhaka is unsafe, unreliable, inefficient and struggles to cope with the day-to-day mobility of its massive population. Consequently, measuring the performance of bus service quality (SQ) from the customers’ perspective is fundamental in planning a sustainable bus transport system for Dhaka, and in developing the associated policies and regulations. Although there are some studies addressing the performance of the public transport systems in Bangladesh, little research considers how service quality attributes affect passengers’ satisfaction. The purpose of this paper is to examine a relationship between bus service quality and its influencing factors in Dhaka. Using a customer satisfaction survey with a sample size of 955, discrete choice models (e.g., multinomial logit and mixed logit) have been developed. The results indicate that the inhabitants, as expected, are dissatisfied with their bus services (less than 10% rated service quality as “excellent/good”) and service attributes such as comfort level and driver skills were found to be the most important contributors toward the “poor” and “very poor” perceptions of service quality. Other influencing factors are punctuality, safety, entry and exit processes, waiting times, and vehicle condition. One surprising finding was that the multinomial logit model provides better goodness-of-fit for the sample data relative to the mixed logit model implying that bus users in Dhaka may represent a homogeneous group as they do have access to other modes. Findings from this study can be utilized to develop policies and regulations to improve bus transport in Dhaka.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Demographia. Demographia World Urban Areas. 14th Annual Edition 201804, Demographia, 2018.
2. United Nations, 2009, World Urbanization Prospects, the 2009 Revision. United Nations: Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division, Population estimates and Projections Section. http://esa.un.org/unpd/wup/Documents/WUP2009_Highlights_Final.pdf. Accessed July 20, 2018.
3. Strategic Transport Plan. Strategic Transport Plan for Dhaka. Final Report. 4 Louis Berger Group and Bangladesh Consultants Ltd., Dhaka, 2005.
4. Quddus M., Modi S., Ison S. The Transport Crisis in Dhaka City: A Role for the Introduction of Intelligent Transport Systems?Presented at 89th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2010.
5. Davidson L. J., Knowles R. D. Bus Quality Partnerships, Modal Shift and Traffic Decongestion. Journal of Transport Geography, Vol. 14 No. 3, 2006, pp. 265–284.
6. Aidoo E. N., Agyemang W., Monkah J. E., Afukaar F. K. Passenger’s Satisfaction with Public Bus Transport Services in Ghana: A Case Study of Kumasi–Accra Route. Theoretical and Empirical Researches in Urban Management, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2013, pp. 33–44.
7. de Oña J., de Oña R. Quality of Service in Public Transport Based on Customer Satisfaction Surveys: A Review and Assessment of Methodological Approaches. Transportation Science, Vol. 49, No. 3, 2014, pp. 605–622.
8. Oliver R. L. A Conceptual Model of Service Quality and Service Satisfaction: Compatible Goals, Different Concepts. In Advances in Services Marketing and Management: Research and Practice, (Swartz T. A., Bowen D. E., Brown S. W., eds.), Vol. 2, JAI Press, Greenwich, Conn., 1993.
9. Kassim N., Abdullah N. A. The Effect of Perceived Service Quality Dimensions on Customer Satisfaction, Trust, and Loyalty in E-commerce Settings: A Cross Cultural Analysis. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, Vol. 22, No. 3, 2010, pp. 351–371.
10. Diana M. Measuring the Satisfaction of Multimodal Travelers for Local Transit Services in Different Urban Contexts. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 46, No. 1, 2012, pp. 1–11.
11. Fellesson M., Friman M. Perceived Satisfaction with Public Transport Service in Nine European Cities. Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Vol. 47, No. 3, 2012.
12. Kumar D., Chen W., Simpson T. W. A Market-Driven Approach to Product Family Design. International Journal of Production Research, Vol. 47, No. 1, 2009, pp. 71–104.
13. Andaleeb S. S., Haq M., Ahmed R. I. Reforming Inner-City Bus Transportation in a Developing Country: A Passenger-Driven Model. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 1, 2007, pp. 1–25.
14. Ahmed I., Alam N. E., Warda F. A Sustainable Urban Transport Initiative in Dhaka: Introducing Bus Rapid Transit. Transport and Communications Bulletin for Asia and the Pacific, No. 87, 2017, pp. 67–77.
15. Hoque M., Hossain T. Augmentation of Mass Transit Mode in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Proc., CODATU XI: World Congress: Toward More Attractive Urban Transportation, Bucharest, Bangladesh University of Engineering and Technology, 2004.
16. Katz D., Rahman M. Levels of Overcrowding in Bus System of Dhaka, Bangladesh. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2010. 2143: 85–91.
17. Machado-León J. L., de Oña R., Baouni T., de Oña J. Railway Transit Services in Algiers: Priority Improvement Actions Based on Users Perceptions. Transport Policy, Vol. 53, pp. 175–185.
18. Geetika N. S. Determinants of Customer Satisfaction on Service Quality: A Study of Railway Platform in India. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 97–114.
19. Mahmoudi S. M., Verdinejad F., Jandaghi G., Mughari A. M. Analysis and Establishment of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) on Customer Satisfaction in Tehran. African Journal of Business Management, Vol. 4, No. 12, 2010, pp.2514–2519.
20. Prasad M. D., Shekhar B. R. Development of RAILQUAL: A Service Quality Scale for Measuring Indian Railway Passenger Services. Management Science and Engineering, Vol. 4, No. 3, 2010, pp. 87–94.
21. Prasad M. D., Shekhar B. R. Analyzing the Passenger Service Quality of the Indian Railways Using Railqual: Examining the Applicability of Fuzzy Logic. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management, Vol. 1, No. 5, 2010, pp. 478–482.
22. Irfan S. M., Kee D. M. H., Shahbaz I. S. Service Quality and Rail Transport in Pakistan: A Passenger Perspective. World Applied Sciences Journal, Vol. 18, No. 3, 2012, pp. 361–369.
23. Celik E., Aydin N., Gumus A. T. A multiattribute Customer Satisfaction Evaluation Approach for Rail Transit Network: A Real Case Study for Istanbul, Turkey. Transport Policy, Vol. 36, 2014, pp. 283–293.
24. Ojo T. K., Nutsogbodo R. Y., Appiah-Mintah R. Passenger’s Perspective of Quality of Intercity Bus Transport Service Accra-Cape Coast Route, Ghana. GE International Journal of Management Research, Vol. 2, No. 7, 2014, pp. 267–287.
25. Alpu O. A Methodology for Evaluating Satisfaction with High-Speed Train Services: A Case Study in Turkey. Transport Policy, Vol. 44, 2015, pp. 151–157.
26. Aydin N., Celik E., Gumus A. T. A Hierarchical Customer Satisfaction Framework for Evaluating Rail Transit Systems of Istanbul. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 77, 2015, pp. 61–81.
27. Eboli L., Mazzulla G. A Stated Preference Experiment for Measuring Service Quality in Public Transport. Transportation Planning Tech, Vol. 31, No. 5, 2008, pp. 509–523.
28. Dell’Olio L., Ibeas A., Cecin P. Modelling user Perception of Bus Transit Quality. Transport Policy, Vol. 17, No. 6, 2010, pp. 388–397.
29. Abenoza R., Cats O., Susilo Y. Travel Satisfaction with Public Transport: Determinants, User Classes, Regional Disparities and their Evolution. Transportation Research Part A, Vol. 95, 2017, pp. 64–84.
30. Park J., Robertson R., Wu C. L. The Effect of Airline Service Quality on Passengers’ Behavioural Intentions: A Korean Case Study. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 10, No. 6, 2004, pp. 435–439.
31. De Oña J., De Oña R., Eboli L., Mazzulla G. Perceived Service Quality in Bus Transit Service: A Structural Equation Approach. Transport Policy, Vol. 29, 2013, pp. 219–226.
32. De Oña J., de Oña R., Eboli L., Forciniti C., Mazzulla G. ‘Key Transit Passengers’ Behavioural Intentions: The Influence of Service Quality and Customer Satisfaction’. Transportmetrica A, Vol. 12, No. 5, 2016, pp. 385–412.
33. Eboli L., Mazzulla G G. Service Quality Attributes Affecting Customer Satisfaction for Bus Transit. Journal of Public Transportation, Vol. 10, No. 3, 2007, pp. 21–34.
34. De Oña J., de Oña R., Calvo F. J. A Classification Tree Approach to Identify Key Factors of Transit Service Quality. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 39, No. 12, 2012, pp. 11164–11171.
35. Garrido C., de Oña R., de Oña J. Neural Networks for Analyzing Service Quality in Public Transportation. Expert Systems with Applications, Vol. 41, 2014, pp. 6830–6838.
36. De Oña J., de Oña R., López G. Transit Service Quality Analysis Using Cluster Analysis and Decision Trees: A Step Forward to Personalized Marketing in Public Transportation. Transportation. Vol. 43, No. 5, 2016, pp. 725–747.
37. Bordagaray M., Olio L., Ibeas A., Cecín P. Modelling User Perception of Bus Transit Quality Considering User and Service Heterogeneity. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 10, No. 8, 2014, pp. 705–721.
38. Forgas S., Moliner M. A., Sánchez J., Palau R. Antecedents of Airline Passenger Loyalty: Low-Cost Versus Traditional Airlines. Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 16, No. 4, 2010, pp. 229–233.
39. Wen C. H., Lai S. C. Latent Class Models of International Air Carrier Choice. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Vol. 46, No. 2, 2010, pp. 211–221.
40. Hadiuzzman M., Das T., Hasnat M. M., Hossain S. M., Musabbir S. R. Structural Equation Modeling of User Satisfaction of Bus Transit Service Quality Based on Stated Preferences and Latent Variables. Transportation Planning and Technology, Vol. 40, No. 3, 2017, pp. 257–277.
41. Dell’Olio L., Ibeas A., De Ona J., De Ona R. Public Transportation Quality of Service, 1st ed. Elsevier, Amsterdam, 2017.
42. Hensher D. A., Mulley C., Yahya N. Passenger Experience with Quality-Enhanced Bus Service: The Tyne and Wear “Superoute” Services. Transportation, Vol. 37, No. 2, 2010, pp. 239–256.
43. Train K. E. Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, 2nd ed. Cambridge University Press, 2009.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: February 5, 2019
Issue published: February 2019

Rights and permissions

© National Academy of Sciences: Transportation Research Board 2019.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mohammed Quddus
Transport Studies Group, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Farzana Rahman
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Asia Pacific, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Fredrik Monsuur
Transport Studies Group, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK
Juan de Ona
Department of Civil Engineering, University of Granada, Granada, Spain
Marcus Enoch
Transport Studies Group, School of Architecture, Building and Civil Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough, UK

Notes

Address correspondence to Mohammed Quddus: [email protected]

Author Contributions

The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design, Rahman, Quddus; data collection, Rahman; analysis and interpretation of results, Monsuur, Quddus; draft manuscript preparation, Quddus, Monsuur, Rahman, de Ona, Enoch. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 688

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 27

  1. Developing an agent-based microsimulation for predicting the Bus Rapid...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Evaluating the quality of the public transport service during the COVI...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Anger Expressions of Bus Drivers and Passengers during Conflicts on th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. How does the state of bus operations influence passengers’ service sat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Enhancing service quality of rural public transport during the COVID-1...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Understanding how individuals perceive changes in the built environmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Analyzing service quality of domestic airlines in an emerging country-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Influence of in-vehicle crowding on passenger travel time value: Insig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Exploring the Choice of Bicycling and Walking in Rajshahi, Bangladesh:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Assessing travelers’ characteristics and trip information influencing ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Exploring paratransit service quality based on low-income women's perc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Passenger satisfaction evaluation of public transport using alternativ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions towards public...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Assessment of COVID-19 induced travel pattern changes in Dhaka City
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. A Qualitative case study on inadequate public transport system and its...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. How does private vehicle users perceive the public transport service q...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Public transport customer satisfaction evaluation using an extended th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Exploring the travel behavior changes caused by the COVID-19 crisis: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Customers’ Satisfaction on Bus Rapid Transit Services in Tanzania: The...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Understanding the mediator role of satisfaction in public transport: A...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Understanding the public rail quality of service towards commuters’ lo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Sequenced Ordered Logit Model Considering Latent Variables for Determi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Noncommunicable Diseases, Park Prescriptions, and Urban Green Space Us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Passenger Satisfaction Evaluation of Public Transportation Using Pytha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Perception of Public Transport Quality of Service among Regular Privat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Simulation-Based Sensitivity Analysis for Evaluating Factors Affecting...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Performance Evaluation of Public Transportation System: Analyzing the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text