Analysis of Crash Rates at Freeway Diverge Areas using Bayesian Tobit Modeling Framework
Abstract
The goal of this study is to evaluate the impact of various risk factors on crash rates at freeway diverge areas. Crash rates data for a three-year period from 367 freeway diverge areas were used for analysis. Four candidate Tobit models were developed and compared under the Bayesian framework: a traditional Tobit model; a random parameters Tobit (RP-Tobit) model; a grouped random parameters Tobit (GRP-Tobit) model; and a random intercept Tobit (RI-Tobit). The results showed that the RP-Tobit model performs best with highest value of Rd2 as well as lowest Mean Absolute Deviance (MAD) and Deviance Information Criteria (DIC), indicating the importance of accounting for unobserved heterogeneity to improve the model fit. Both the GRP-Tobit and the RI-Tobit models provide better performance than the traditional Tobit model. The model results showed that crash rates at freeway diverge areas were positively associated with mainline annual average daily traffic (AADT) and negatively associated with ramp AADT, indicating the different mechanisms of the impact of traffic volume on crash rates at freeway diverge areas. Lane-balanced design and high speed limits at freeway diverge areas have a negative effect on crash rates. The number of lanes on mainline and ramp length have significant heterogeneous effects on crash rates across observations. The RP-Tobit model provides a more comprehensive understanding of the heterogeneous effects of risk factors on crash rates across observations.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Chen H., Liu P., Lu J. J., Behzadi B. Evaluating the Safety Impacts of the Number and Arrangement of Lanes on Freeway Exit Ramps. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 3, 2009, pp. 543–551.
2. Liu P., Chen H., Lu J. J., Cao B. How Lane Arrangements on Freeway Mainlines and Ramps Affect Safety of Freeways with Closely Spaced Entrance and Exit Ramps. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 136, No. 7, 2009, pp. 614–622.
3. Li Z., Wang W., Liu P., Bai L., Du M. Analysis of Crash Risks by Collision Type at Freeway Diverge Area using Multivariate Modeling Technique. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Vol. 141, No. 6, 2015, p. 04015002.
4. Bauer K. M., Harwood D. W. Statistical Models of Accidents on Interchange Ramps and Speed-change Lanes. Federal Highway Administration (FHWA)-RD-97-106. Washington, D.C., 1998.
5. McCartt A. T., Northrup V. S., Retting R. A. Types and Characteristics of Ramp-Related Motor Vehicle Crashes on Urban Interstate Roadways in Northern Virginia. Journal of Safety Research, Vol. 35, No. 1, 2004, pp. 107–114.
6. Lord D., Bonneson J. Calibration of Predictive Models for Estimating Safety of Ramp Design Configurations. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2005. 1908: 88–95.
7. Moon J. P., Hummer J. E. Development of Safety Prediction Models for Influence Areas of Ramps in Freeways. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2009, pp. 1–17.
8. Lu J., Geng N., Chen H. Impacts of Freeway Exit Ramp Configurations on Traffic Operations and Safety. Advances in Transportation Studies, Vol. 22, 2010, pp. 999–1009.
9. Wu W. Q., Wang W., Li Z. B., Liu P., Wang Y. Application of Generalized Estimating Equations for Crash Frequency Modeling with Temporal Correlation. Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A, Vol. 15, No. 7, 2014, pp. 529–539.
10. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. 2010 Motor Vehicle Crashes: Overview. Research Note DOT HS. US Department of Transportation, Washington, D.C., 2012.
11. Ma L., Yan X., Weng J. Modeling Traffic Crash Rates of Road Segments through a Lognormal Hurdle Framework with Flexible Scale Parameter. Journal of Advanced Transportation, Vol. 49, No. 8, 2015, pp. 928–940.
12. Xu X., Wong S. C., Choi K. A Two-stage Bivariate Logistic-Tobit Model for the Safety Analysis of Signalized Intersections. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 3–4, 2014, pp. 1–10.
13. Anastasopoulos P. C., Tarko A. P., Mannering F. L. Tobit Analysis of Vehicle Accident Rates on Interstate Highways. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 2, 2008, pp. 768–775.
14. Anastasopoulos P. C., Mannering F. L., Shankar V. N., Haddock J. E. A study of Factors Affecting Highway Accident Rates Using the Random-Parameters Tobit Model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 628–633.
15. Xu X., Kouhpanejade A., Šarić Z. Analysis on Influencing Factors Identification of Crash Rates Using Tobit Model with Endogenous Variable. PROMET-Traffic&Transportation, Vol. 25, No. 3, 2013, pp. 217–224.
16. Ma X., Chen F., Chen S. Modeling Crash Rates for a Mountainous Highway by Using Refined-Scale Panel Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2015. 2515: 10–16.
17. Yu R., Xiong Y., Abdel-Aty M. A Correlated Random Parameter Approach to Investigate the Effects of Weather Conditions on Crash Risk for a Mountainous Freeway. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, Vol. 50, 2015, pp. 68–77.
18. Caliendo C., De Guglielmo M. L., Guida M. Comparison and Analysis of Road Tunnel Traffic Accident Frequencies and Rates Using Random-parameter Models. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 8, No. 2, 2016, pp. 177–195.
19. Bin Islam M., Hernandez S. Fatality Rates for Crashes Involving Heavy Vehicles on Highways: A Random Parameter Tobit Regression Approach. Journal of Transportation Safety & Security, Vol. 8, No. 3, 2016, pp. 247–265.
20. Anastasopoulos P. C. Random Parameters Multivariate Tobit and Zero-inflated Count Data Models: Addressing Unobserved and Zero-state Heterogeneity in Accident Injury-severity Rate and Frequency Analysis. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 11, 2016, pp. 17–32.
21. Zeng Q., Wen H., Huang H., Abdel-Aty M. A Bayesian Spatial Random Parameters Tobit Model for Analyzing Crash Rates on Roadway Segments. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 100, 2017, pp. 37–43.
22. Zeng Q., Wen H., Huang H., Pei X., Wong S. C. A Multivariate Random-Parameters Tobit Model for Analyzing Highway Crash Rates by Injury Severity. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 99, 2017, pp. 184–191.
23. Anderson J., Hernandez S. Heavy-vehicle Crash Rate Analysis: Comparison of Heterogeneity Methods Using Idaho Crash Data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2017. 2637: 56–66.
24. Sarwar M. T., Anastasopoulos P. C. The Effect of Long Term Non-invasive Pavement Deterioration on Accident Injury-severity Rates: A Seemingly Unrelated and Multivariate Equations Approach. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 13, 2017, pp. 1–15.
25. Zeng Q., Wen H., Huang H., Pei X., Wong S. C. Incorporating Temporal Correlation into a Multivariate Random Parameters Tobit Model for Modeling Crash Rate by Injury Severity. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, Vol. 14, No. 3, 2018, pp. 177–191.
26. Bared J., Giering G. L., Warren D. L. Safety Evaluation of Acceleration and Deceleration Lane Lengths. Institute of Transportation Engineers. ITE Journal, Vol. 69, No. 5, 1999, pp. 50–54.
27. Golob T. F., Recker W. W., Alvarez V. M. Safety Aspects of Freeway Weaving Sections. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 38, No. 1, 2004, pp. 35–51.
28. Garcia A., Romero M. A. Experimental Observation of Vehicle Evolution on Deceleration Lanes with Different Lengths. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2006.
29. Wang Z., Chen H., Lu J. Exploring Impacts of Factors Contributing to Injury Severity at Freeway Diverge Areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2009. 2102: 43–52.
30. Wang Z., Cao B., Deng W., Zhang Z., Lu J. J., Chen H. Safety Evaluation of Truck-Related Crashes at Freeway Diverge Areas. Presented at 85th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2011.
31. Wang Z., Lu J. J., Zhang Z. Exploring Impacts of Factors Contributing to Injury Severity at Freeway Exit Ramps. First Congress of Transportation and Development Institute Chicago, Ill., 2011.
32. Chen H., Zhou H., Zhao J., Hsu P. Safety Performance Evaluation of Left-side Off-ramps at Freeway Diverge Areas. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 43, No. 3, 2011, pp. 605–612.
33. Chen H., Zhang Y., Wang Z., Lu J. Identifying Crash Distributions and Prone Locations by Lane Groups at Freeway Diverging Areas. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2011. 2237: 88–97.
34. Yang Z. H. A. N. G., Zhibin L. I., Pan L. I. U., Liteng Z. H. A. Exploring Contributing Factors to Crash Injury Severity at Freeway Diverge Areas Using Ordered Probit Model. Procedia Engineering, Vol. 21, 2011, pp. 178–185.
35. Li Z., Liu P., Wang W., Xu C. Using Support Vector Machine Models for Crash Injury Severity Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 45, 2012, pp. 478–486.
36. Papadimitriou E., Theofilatos A. Meta-analysis of Crash-Risk Factors in Freeway Entrance and Exit Areas. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 143, No. 10, 2017, p. 04017050.
37. Mannering F. L., Bhat C. R. Analytic Methods in Accident Research: Methodological Frontier and Future Directions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 1, 2014, pp. 1–22.
38. Chen F., Ma X., Chen S. Refined-scale Panel Data Crash Rate Analysis Using Random-effects Tobit Model. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 73, 2014, pp. 323–332.
39. Xiong Y., Mannering F. L. The Heterogeneous Effects of Guardian Supervision on Adolescent Driver-injury Severities: A Finite-mixture Random-parameters Approach. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 39–54.
40. Mannering F. L., Shankar V., Bhat C. R. Unobserved Heterogeneity and the Statistical Analysis of Highway Accident Data. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 11, 2016, pp. 1–16.
41. Ma X., Chen S., Chen F. Correlated Random Parameter Marginalized Two-part Model: Application to Refined-scale Longitudinal Crash Rates Data. Journal of Transportation Engineering, Part A: Systems, Vol. 144, No. 2, 2017, p. 04017071.
42. A Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington, D.C., 2001.
43. Tobin J. Estimation of Relationships for Limited Dependent Variables. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, Vol. 26, 1958, pp. 24–36.
44. Guo Y., Li Z., Wu Y., Xu C. Exploring Unobserved Heterogeneity in Bicyclists’ Red-light Running Behaviors at Different Crossing Facilities. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 115, 2018, pp. 118–127.
45. Guo Y., Osama A., Sayed T. A Cross-comparison of Different Techniques for Modeling Macro-level Cyclist Crashes. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 113, 2018, pp. 38–46.
46. Milton J. C., Shankar V. N., Mannering F. L. Highway Accident Severities and the Mixed Logit Model: An Exploratory Empirical Analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 40, No. 1, 2008, pp. 260–266.
47. El-Basyouny K., Sayed T. Accident Prediction Models with Random Corridor Parameters. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 5, 2009, pp. 1118–1123.
48. Anastasopoulos P. C., Mannering F. L. A Note on Modeling Vehicle Accident Frequencies with Random-parameters Count Models. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 41, No. 1, 2009, pp. 153–159.
49. Wu Z., Sharma A., Mannering F. L., Wang S. Safety Impacts of Signal-warning Flashers and Speed Control At High-speed Signalized Intersections. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 54, 2013, pp. 90–98.
50. Fountas G., Anastasopoulos P. C., Mannering F. L. Analysis of Vehicle Accident-Injury Severities: A Comparison of Segment-versus Accident-based Latent Class Ordered Probit Models with Class-Probability Functions. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 18, 2018, pp. 15–32.
51. Sarwar M. T., Anastasopoulos P. C., Golshani N., Hulme K. F. Grouped Random Parameters Bivariate Probit Analysis of Perceived and Observed Aggressive Driving Behavior: A Driving Simulation Study. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 13, 2017, pp. 52–64.
52. Cai Q., Abdel-Aty M., Lee J., Wang L., Wang X. Developing a Grouped Random Parameters Multivariate Spatial Model to Explore Zonal Effects for Segment and Intersection Crash Modeling. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 19, 2018, pp. 1–15.
53. Sarwar M. T., Fountas G., Anastasopoulos P. C. Simultaneous Estimation of Discrete Outcome and Continuous Dependent Variable Equations: A Bivariate Random Effects Modeling Approach with Unrestricted Instruments. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 16, 2017, pp. 23–34.
54. Spiegelhalter D. J., Best N. G., Carlin B. P., Van Der Linde A. Bayesian Measures of Model Complexity and Fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B (Statistical Methodology), Vol. 64, No. 4, 2002, pp. 583–639.
55. Xu P., Huang H. Modeling Crash Spatial Heterogeneity: Random Parameter versus Geographically Weighting. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 75, 2015, pp. 16–25.
56. Guo Y., Li Z., Wu Y., Xu C. Evaluating Factors Affecting Electric Bike Users’ Registration of License Plate in China Using Bayesian Approach. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, Vol. 59, 2018, pp. 212–221.
57. Lave C., Elias P. Did the 65 mph Speed Limit Save Lives? Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 26, No. 1, 1994, pp. 49–62.
58. Mannering F. Temporal Instability and the Analysis of Highway Accident Data. Analytic Methods in Accident Research, Vol. 17, 2018, pp. 1–13.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published online: March 21, 2019
Issue published: April 2019
Authors
Author Contributions
The authors confirm contribution to the paper as follows: study conception and design, YG, ZL, TS; data collection, ZL; analysis and interpretation of results, YG, ZL, TS; draft manuscript preparation, YG, ZL, TS. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 296
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 15
- Study on the Rationality of Lane Imbalance Design in Freeway Diverging...
- Investigating Safety of Evasion Maneuver Choices by Human-Driven Vehic...
- Unobserved heterogeneity in ramp crashes due to alignment, interchange...
- Research on Influencing Factors of Traffic Conflicts in Freeway Diverg...
- Associating Incident Clearance Duration with Freeway Segment Types Usi...
- Adaptive Coordinated Variable Speed Limit between Highway Mainline and...
- Identification of contributing factors for interchange crashes based o...
- Risk Identification and Conflict Prediction from Videos Based on TTC-M...
- A Roadway Safety Sustainable Approach: Modeling for Real-Time Traffic ...
- Using Bayesian Tobit Models to Understand the Impact of Mobile Automat...
- Predicting Wet-Road Crashes Using the Finite-Mixture Zero-Truncated Ne...
- Analysis of Freeway Secondary Crashes in Different Traffic Flow States...
- Modeling Collision Probability on Freeway: Accounting for Different Ty...
- Predicting downgrade crash frequency with the random-parameters negati...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
