Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Age-Related Changes in Selected Status Variables in General Aviation Pilots

Abstract

Nine status variables were analyzed in an attempt to narrow the focus of where, within the active pilot population, to look for some of the factors that may be associated with increase in risk of becoming involved in a general aviation accident. Epidemiological analysis of general aviation pilots indicates that there is a significant rise in the accident rate for pilots after age 39. An analysis was made of changes in the frequency of occurrence of selected status variables between pilots in the 35 to 39 and those in the 40 to 44 age groups who were involved in general aviation accidents in 1992, 1993, and 1994; between pilots in the 35 to 39 and those in the 40 to 44 age groups in the active pilot population; and between accident-involved pilots and those in the active pilot population. Status variables analyzed were Federal Aviation Administration pilot and medical certificates, instrument rating, flight time, pilot occupation and gender, and purpose of the accident flight. The two age groups of accident-involved pilots differed on only one variable. However, examination of the data showed two distinct differences between accident-involved pilots and the active pilot population. The most substantial finding for both age groups was that accident-involved pilots were significantly different from the active pilot population. Second, with the exception of class of FAA medical certificates, accident-involved pilots did not differ significantly with age whereas the active pilot population differed significantly over five status variables.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Annual Review of Aircraft Accident Data: U.S. General Aviation Calendar Year 1993, Report NTSB/ARG-95/01. National Transportation Safety Board, May 1995.
2. 1993 Aeromedical Certification Statistical Handbook. Report AC 8500-1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Civil Aeromedical Institute, 1994.
3. Booze C.F. An Epidemiologic Investigation of Occupation, Age, and Exposure in General Aviation Accidents, Report FAA-AM-77-10. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aviation Medicine, 1977.
4. McClellan J.M. A New Look at Safety. Flying, September 1990, pp. 34–35.
5. North D.M. Product Liability Is Key Problem for General Aviation Companies. Aviation Week & Space Technology, May 1985, pp. 71, 73–75.
6. Proctor P. Rising Liability Insurance Costs Affect General Aviation Companies. Aviation Week & Space Technology, July 1986, pp. 47–48.
7. Nance J.J. Blind Trust. William Morrow & Co., New York City, N.Y., 1986.
8. Lacagnina M. Is Our Complacency Showing? Aviation Safety Vol. 15, May 1995, p. 15.
9. Bruggink G.M. Human Performance Investigation. U.S. Department of Transportation, Transportation Safety Institute, Oklahoma City, Okla. 1985.
10. Beatty J.T. Accident Investigator. Women in Aviation, Vol. 8, winter 1996, pp. 9–14.
11. 1994 Aeromedical Certification Statistical Handbook. Report AC 8500-1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Civil Aeromedical Institute, 1995.
12. 1992 Aeromedical Certification Statistical Handbook. Report AC 8500-1. U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, Civil Aeromedical Institute, 1993.
13. Golaszewski R. The Influence of Total Flight Time, Recent Flight Time and Age on Pilot Accident Rates. Technical Report DTRS57-83-P-80750. Acumenics Research and Technology, Inc., 1983.
14. Kay E.J., Hillman D.J., Hyland D.T., Voros R.S., Harris R.M., and Deimler J.D. Age 60 Study, Part III: Consolidated Database Experiments Final Report, Report DOT/FAA/AM-94/22. FAA Office of Aviation Medicine, 1994.
15. Dille J.R., and Morris E.W. Human Factors in General Aviation Accidents, Report AM 66–27. Federal Aviation Administration, Office of Aviation Medicine, 1966.
16. Lategola M.T., Fiorica V., Booze C.F., and Folk E.D. Comparison of Status Variables among Accident and Non-Accident Airmen from the Active Airman Population, Report AM 70-18A. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aviation Medicine, 1970.
17. Fraenkel J.R., and Wallen N.E. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. McGraw-Hill, New York City, N.Y., 1990.
18. Hunter D.R. Airman Research Questionnaire: Methodology and Overall Results. DOT/FAA/AAM-95/Draft. Federal Aviation Administration Office of Aviation Medicine, 1995.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Julie Anne Yates Harkey
435 Willow Street, Terre Haute, Ind. 47802–1129.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 1

  1. Unlocking Women’s Barriers and Gender Discrepancies in the Asia Aviati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub