Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Emissions Comparison between Truck and Rail: Case Study of California I-40

Abstract

A comprehensive goods movement study of the California Interstate 40 corridor (from Barstow to Needles) has recently been completed. This study attempted to characterize goods movement in the region, perform a corridor emissions analysis, and make recommendations in terms of capacity and improvements, as well as economic feasibility of using rail in conjunction with trucks for goods movement. The emissions analysis of goods movement along the I-40 corridor is examined, specifically emissions of carbon monoxide, hydrocarbons, nitrogen oxides (NOx), and particulate matter associated with both truck and rail traffic. Heavy-duty diesel truck emissions are estimated using truck activity data recorded along the corridor. A unique methodology is used to calculate these truck emissions, incorporating road grade factors and determining engine load on a link-by-link basis. These emissions are then compared with the emissions associated with freight trains that travel along this I-40 corridor. On the basis of current (1994) truck and rail volumes, it was found that goods moved by rail produces lower emissions, except for NOx, which is slightly higher for rail. The factor decrease of other pollutants ranges from 2.49 to 8.50, which is consistent with other recent studies. Given the amount of pollutants produced by trucks, shifting some of the freight from trucks to rail with a greater emphasis on intermodal business should reduce the total freight emissions along the I-40 corridor.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Tadi R., and Barth M. Economic and Emissions Analysis of Intermodal Goods Movement for the California I-40 Corridor. Technical Report 95-TS-052F Riverside College of Engineering Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, 1995.
2. Blevins W.G., and Gibson A.W. Comparison of Emissions and Energy Use for Truck and Rail. Proc., 1991 TAC Annual Conference, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, 1991, pp. B27–B42.
3. Abacus Technology Corporation. Rail vs. Truck Fuel Efficiency: The Relative Fuel Efficiency of Truck Competitive Rail Freight and Truck Operations Compared in a Range of Corridors. FRA-RRP-91-02. FRA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1991.
4. Colorado River Regional Transportation Study. Tri-State Planning Area, Bullhead City, Ariz., 1993.
5. Barth M. J., and Norbeck J. M. A Power-Demand Approach to Estimating Vehicle Emissions. Proc., 4th CRC-APRAC On-Road Vehicle Emission Workshop, San Diego, Calif., 1994, pp. 5-51–5-72.
6. ETAK. ETAK Inc., The Digital Map Company, Menlo Park, Calif.
7. Johnston E., and Barth M. Using GPS Technology to Obtain Accurate Speed, Acceleration, and Grade Information for On-Road Emission Measurements. Proc., 5th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, Calif. 1995, pp. 817–844.
8. Maldonado H. Methodology to Calculate Emission Factors for On-Road Motor Vehicles. Technical Report. California Air Resources Board, 1991.
9. Maldonado H. Supplement to Methodology to Calculate Emission Factors for On-Road Motor Vehicles July 1991. Technical Report. California Air Resources Board, 1992.
10. Atkinson C. Heavy-Duty Vehicle Emissions: Research in Speciation and Results from the West Virginia University Transportable Laboratory. Proc., 4th CRC-APRAC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, Calif., 1994, pp. 4-49–5-1.
11. Southern California's Accelerated Rail Electrification Program. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, 1992.
12. Booz-Allen, & Hamilton. Locomotive Emissions Study. California Air Resources Board, 1991.
13. Fritz S. G. Exhaust Emissions from Two Intercity Passenger Locomotives. Southwest Research Institute; Division of Rail, California Department of Transportation, 1992.
14. Engine, Fuel, and Emissions Engineering, Inc., Controlling Locomotive Emissions in California: Technology, Cost Effectiveness, and Regulatory Strategy. California Air Resources Board, 1993.
15. Regional Mobility Element, The Long Range Transportation Plan for the SCAG Region. Technical Report. Southern California Association of Governments, 1994.
16. Hutchins F. P. Estimate of Relative NOx Emissions Resulting from Movement of Freight by Truck and by Train. Environmental Protection Agency, 1994.
17. Transportation Issues Along the California/Mexico International Border. Technical Report. California Department of Transportation, 1993.
18. California Trade and Goods Movement Study. San Diego (Calif.) Association of Governments, 1995.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew J. Barth
Center for Environmental Research and Technology, College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Calif. 92521.
Ramakrishna R. Tadi
Center for Environmental Research and Technology, College of Engineering, University of California, Riverside, Calif. 92521.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 18

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 6

  1. Brief overview of the general aspects of electromobility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Road-rail intermodality and the Clean Development Mechanism
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A comparative assessment of CO2 emission between gasoline, electric, a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Multi-scale evaluation of diesel commuter rail fuel use, emissions, an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Spatial Assignment of Emissions Using a New Locomotive Emissions Model
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Emissions impacts of a modal shift: a case study of the Southern Calif...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub