Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Emissions Analysis of Southern California Metrolink Commuter Rail

Abstract

The Southern California Regional Rail Authority began constructing a new commuter rail system called Metrolink in October 1992. When complete, the Metrolink system will form the nation's sixth largest commuter rail system and is expected to alleviate congestion and help obtain better air quality. To estimate the air quality impact, emissions of CO, HC, NOx, and PM associated with an automobile-only–based commute and a Metrolink-based commute from Riverside to Los Angeles are compared. Analysis of the Metrolink-based commuting scenario includes the emissions from the home-to-station automobile trip and the Metrolink diesel locomotive emissions. Essential data for the automobile emissions modeling process were obtained through a survey of Metrolink passengers and through remote emissions sensing of Metrolink passenger vehicles. Train emissions were estimated using emission rate data provided by recent diesel locomotive studies. Results indicated that at current ridership levels there is a reduction in total amount of all four pollutants combined through Metrolink commuting. On a pollutant-by-pollutant basis, it was estimated that the Metrolink commuting scenario reduces the emissions of CO and HC relative to the automobile-only commuting scenario; however, it increases the emissions of NOx and PM. The minimum amount of Metrolink ridership required to get a net emissions reduction from the system is predicted.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Clarke B. Forging the Link. ASCE Civil Engineering Magazine, 1995, pp. 72–74.
2. Southern California Accelerated Rail Electrification Program. Technical report. Southern California Regional Rail Authority, Feb. 1992.
3. Fritz S. G. Exhaust Emissions from Two Intercity Passenger Locomotives. Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, Tex. CALTRANS, Division of Rail, Nov. 1992.
4. Maldonado H. Methodology to Calculate Emission Factors for On-Road Motor Vehicles (& Supplement). California Air Resources Board, 1991 and 1992.
5. Ochoa D., and Jones L. 1991 Statewide Travel Survey. CALTRANS, Office of Traffic Improvement, Office of Traffic Forecasting and Analysis, Information Services Branch, Dec. 1993.
6. Bishop G. A. et al. A Cost-Effectiveness Study of Carbon Monoxide Emissions Reduction Utilizing Remote Sensing. Journal of A&WMA, Vol. 43, July 1993, pp. 978–988.
7. McAlinden K. Michigan Roadside Study: Analysis of Repairs on High Emission Vehicles. Presented at 4th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emission Workshop, March 16–18, 1994.
8. Lawson D. R., Groblicki P. J. et al. Emissions from In-use Motor Vehicles in Los Angeles: A Pilot Study of Remote Sensing and the Inspection and Maintenance Program. Journal of A&WMA, Vol. 40, No. 8, Aug. 1990, pp. 1096–1105.
9. Todd M., and Barth M. The Variation of Remote Sensing Emission Measurements with Respect to Vehicle Speed and Acceleration. Presented at 5th CRC On-Road Vehicle Emissions Workshop, San Diego, Calif. Feb. 1995.
10. Barth M. J., and Tadi R. R. An Automobile/Transit Emissions Evaluation of Southern California's Metrolink. Technical report 279. University of California Transportation Center, Institute of Transportation Studies, 1995.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Matthew J. Barth
College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Riverside, Calif. 92521.
Theodore Younglove
College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Riverside, Calif. 92521.
Ramakrishna R. Tadi
College of Engineering, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, University of California, Riverside, Calif. 92521.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 7

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Navigation Application Programming Interface Route Fuel Saving Opportu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Methods of Analyzing and Comparing Energy Efficiency of Passenger Rail...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub