Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Strategies for Reducing Energy Consumption and Emissions in Texas Transportation Sector

Abstract

Texas is the nation's highest energy consumer, and it is the highest emitter of carbon dioxide. Texans consume 23 percent more energy per capita on transportation than the nation as a whole. The state's contribution to global climate stabilization and local environmental quality requires reexamination of its transportation system. In this study, four scenarios were constructed reflecting different energy strategies that Texas could pursue to address these issues. These alternative scenarios were measured against a reference scenario that reflects current trends in transport policy. The first alternative, a “roll-back” scenario, examined the consequences of revoking the current alternative fuels programs. Moderate, aggressive and visionary scenarios were also developed consisting of increasingly aggressive policies to reduce energy consumption and emissions. Included in the analyses are various transportation control measures, employee trip-reduction programs, broader use of telecommunications technologies, accelerated vehicle scrappage, “feebates,” mode shifts from automobile to various public transit alternatives and from truck to rail freight, and fuel taxes. The effects of these measures are discussed to identify the ones that have the greatest impact. Only if very aggressive policies are adopted—such as those modeled in the visionary scenario—will transport energy use and greenhouse gas emissions in Texas stabilize, let alone decline. The major stumbling block to implementing such an aggressive suite of transportation policies is the long time frame required for the impacts to come to fruition; the conclusion is political difficulties in taking a long-term perspective will need to be overcome.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. State Energy Data Report 1992 Consumption Estimates. DOE/ EIA-0214(92). U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, May 1994.
2. Annual Energy Outlook 1995. DOE/EIA-0383 (1995). U.S. Department of Energy, Energy Information Administration, 1995.
3. Goff Z.A., and Steffel K. Texas Transportation Energy Data Book: Edition 2. SWUTC/91/60014-2. Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 1994.
4. Overview and User Guide for LEAP. Stockholm Environment Institute—Boston (SEI-B), Tellus Institute, Boston, Mass., 1993.
5. An Assessment of Transportation Control Measures, Transportation Technologies, and Pricing/Regulatory Policies. Research Report SEDC-2, Texas Transportation Study for the Texas Sustainable Energy Development Council, University of Texas at Austin's Center for Transportation Research and Tellus Institute, June 1995.
6. Davis W.B., Levine M.D., and Train K. in association with K.G. Duleep. Feebates: Estimated Impacts on Vehicle Fuel Economy, Fuel Consumption, CO2 Emissions, and Consumer Surplus, Draft. Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, LBL-34408, 1993.
7. Tatsutani M. UNOCAL Corporation's SCRAP: An Experiment in Corporate Environmental Initiative. Energy and Resources Group, University of California at Berkeley, 1991.
8. Alberini A., Edelstein D., Harrington W., and McConnell V. Reducing Emissions from Old Cars: The Economics of the Delaware Vehicle Retirement Program. Discussion Paper 94-27. Resources for the Future, Washington, D.C., 1994.
9. Fulmer M., and Bernow S. A Social Cost Analysis of Alternative Fuels for Light Vehicles. In Transportation and Energy: Strategies for a Sustainable Transportation System, American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington D.C., 1995.
10. Dahl C.A., and Sterner T. A Survey of Econometric Gasoline Demand Elasticities, International Journal of Energy Systems, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1991, pp. 53–76.
11. DeCicco J.M., and Ross M. An Undated Assessment of the Near-Term Potential for Improving Automotive Fuel Economy. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy, Washington, D.C., 1993.
12. Mixed-Use Urban Centers: Economic and Transportation Characteristics. Literature Review. Cambridge Systematics, Inc.; Parsons Brinckerhoff Quade and Douglas, Inc., 1993.
13. Strategies for Reducing Energy Consumption in the Texas Transportation Sector. Research Report SEDC-2, Texas Transportation Study for the Texas Sustainable Energy Development Council, University of Texas at Austin's Center for Transportation Research and Tellus Institute, 1995.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Mark A. Euritt
Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, Tex. 78712.
Mike Martello
Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, Tex. 78712.
Jiefeng Qin
Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, Tex. 78712.
Angela Weissmann
Center for Transportation Research, University of Texas, Austin, Tex. 78712.
Stephen Bernow
Tellus Institute, 11 Arlington Street, Boston, Mass. 02116.
Mark Fulmer
Tellus Institute, 11 Arlington Street, Boston, Mass. 02116.
Irene Peters
Tellus Institute, 11 Arlington Street, Boston, Mass. 02116.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 5

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. A Quantitative and Systematic Methodology to Investigate Energy Consum...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Developing Transportation-Related Environmental Policy for the United ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub