Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Earth Pressures Due to Compaction: Comparison of Theory with Laboratory and Field Behavior

Abstract

Compaction of backfill adjacent to stiff and unyielding structures induces earth pressures in the compacted fill that exceed normal at-rest earth pressures. A numerical method that can be used to calculate compaction-induced lateral earth pressures has been proposed by Duncan and Seed. The purpose of the study described in this paper is to evaluate the theory by comparing calculated and measured compaction-induced lateral earth pressures. The data for the comparisons is from values measured in backfills behind three stiff, unyielding walls: the instrumented retaining wall in the Transport and Road Research Laboratory in Crawthorne, England; the instrumented retaining wall in the Virginia Tech Geotechnical Laboratory in Blacksburg, Virginia; and the lock walls at Eisenhower and Snell Locks in New York state. The lock walls were found to be cracked, apparently by high earth pressures induced by compaction, and an extensive rehabilitation program was required. The measurements from all three walls confirm the existence of compaction-induced lateral earth pressures. For clean sand backfill, pressures calculated using the theory of Duncan and Seed are shown to be in reasonable agreement with measured values. Laboratory test data indicate that for moisture-sensitive silty sand backfill the applicability of the Duncan and Seed theory, which does not include considerations of pore water pressure development during backfill placement and compaction, depends on the degree of saturation of the backfill.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Duncan J. M., and Seed R. B. Compaction-Induced Earth Pressures Under K0-Conditions. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 112, No. 1, Jan. 1986, pp. 1–22.
2. Carder D. R., Pocock R. G., and Murray R. T. Experimental Retaining Wall Facility-Lateral Stress Measurements with Sand Backfill. Laboratory Report 766. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1977.
3. Carder D. R., Murray R. T., and Krawczyk J. V. Earth Pressures Against an Experimental Retaining Wall Backfilled with Silty Clay. Laboratory Report 946. Transport and Road Research Laboratory, Crowthorne, Berkshire, United Kingdom, 1980.
4. Sehn A. L., and Duncan J. M. Experimental Study of Earth Pressures on Retaining Structures. Geotechnical Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 1990.
5. Filz G. M., and Duncan J. M. An Experimental and Analytic Study of Earth Loads on Rigid Retaining Walls. Geotechnical Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 1992.
6. Mosher R. L., Bevins T. L., and Neeley B. D. Structural Evaluation of Eisenhower and Snell Locks, Saint Lawrence Seaway, Massena, New York. Technical Report ITL-91-4. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Miss., 1991.
7. Schmertmann J. H. Horizontal Pressures on Eisenhower and Snell Lock Walls. Schmertmann and Crapps, Inc., 1986.
8. Christiansen J. F. Geotechnical Parameters, Glacial Till Backfill, Eisenhower and Snell Locks, Saint Lawrence Seaway, Massena, New York. Empire Soils Investigations, Inc., Groton, N.Y., 1985.
9. Duncan J. M., Williams G. W., Sehn A. L., and Seed R. B. Estimating Earth Pressures Due to Compaction. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 117, No. 12, Dec. 1991, pp. 1833–1847.
10. Duncan J. M., Williams G. W., Sehn A. L., and Seed R. B. Estimating Earth Pressures Due to Compaction, Closure to Discussions. Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division, ASCE, Vol. 119, No. 7, July 1993, pp. 1172–1177.
11. Ishihara K., and Duncan J. M. At-Rest and Compaction-Induced Earth Pressures of Moist Soils. Geotechnical Engineering Division, Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, 1993.
12. Filz G. M., and Duncan J. M. Pressure Cell Drift. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 16, No. 4, Dec. 1993, pp. 432–441.
13. Filz G. M., and Brandon T. L. Instrumentation for Dynamic Compactor Force Measurements. Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM, Vol. 16, No. 4, Dec. 1993, pp. 442–449.
14. Seed R. B., and Duncan J. M. Soil-Structure Interaction Effects of Compaction-Induced Stresses and Deflection. Geotechnical Engineering Research Report UCB/GT/83-06. University of California, Berkeley, 1983.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

George M. Filz
Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va. 24061-0105.
James M. Duncan
Department of Civil Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, Blacksburg, Va. 24061-0105.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 40

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Closure to “Effect of Live Load Surcharge on Retaining Walls and Abutm...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Vertical Shear Loads on Nonmoving Walls. II: Applications
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub