Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Analysis of Pedestrian Conflicts with Left-Turning Traffic

Abstract

The interaction between pedestrians and left-turning vehicles at signalized intersections are examined using the traffic conflict technique. Paramount was a comparison of the safety of left turns at two types intersections: T-intersections and X-intersections (cross-intersections). Previous research has indicated that T-intersections are more dangerous to pedestrians. In preparation for the comparison several traffic conflict definitions and their applications to pedestrians were evaluated. Use of a laptop computer for data collection was tested. Eight sites taken from intersections in Hamilton, Ontario, Canada, were selected. A conflict recording methodology was developed for T-intersections and X-intersections that consisted of recording data at various times along the paths of pedestrians and left-turning vehicles, and recording traffic conflicts. Two computer programs were written for the data collection process: one for vehicles and one for pedestrians. Several statistical tests to relate traffic conflicts and the expected number of accidents were performed. These tests indicate that a positive correlation between traffic conflicts and expected number of accidents exists; they also suggest that T-intersections have a higher traffic conflict rate than X-intersections.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Quaye K., Larsden L., and Hauer E. Pedestrian Accidents and Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1993.
2. Habib P. A. Pedestrian Safety: The Hazards of Left-Turning Vehicles. ITE Journal, 1980, pp. 33–37.
3. Fruin J. J. Pedestrian Accident Characteristics in a One-Way Grid. In Highway Research Record 436, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1973, pp. 1–7.
4. Almuina A. L. Pedestrian Accidents and Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections. M.Eng. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1989.
5. Zaidel D. M., and Hocherman I. Safety of Pedestrian Crossings at Signalized Intersections. In Transportation Research Record 1141, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 1–6.
6. Zegeer C. V., Opiela K. S., and Cynecki M. J. Effect of Pedestrian Signals and Signal Timing on Pedestrian Accidents. In Transportation Research Record 847, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1982, pp. 62–72.
7. Hauer E., Ng J. C. N., and Lovell J. Estimation of Safety at Signalized Intersection. In Transportation Research Record 1185, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1988, pp. 48–61.
8. Zegeer C. V., Mayes J. G., and Deen R. C. Cost Effectiveness of Lane and Shoulder Widening of Rural Two-Lane Roads in Kentucky. In Transportation Research Record 806, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1981, pp. 33–43.
9. Hauer E., and Persaud B. N. How to Estimate the Safety of Rail-Highway Grade Crossings and the Safety Effects of Warning Devices. In Transportation Research Record 1114, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1987, pp. 131–140.
10. Mengert P. Rail-Highway Crossing Resource Allocation Procedure: User's Guide, 2nd edition. Report FHWA-IP-86-11, FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1986.
11. Perkins S. R., and Harris J. L. Traffic Conflict Characteristics— Accident Potential at Intersections. In Highway Research Record 225, HRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1968, pp. 35–44.
12. Glauz W. D., and Migletz D. J. The Traffic Conflict Technique of the United States of America. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 1984, pp. 41–58.
13. Erke H. The Traffic Conflict Technique of the Federal Republic of Germany. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 1984, pp. 107–120.
14. Mulhrad N., and Dupré C. The French Traffic Conflict Technique. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany, 1984, pp. 121–132.
15. Cooper P. J. Experience with Traffic Conflicts in Canada with Emphasis on Post Encroachment Time Techniques. In International Calibration Study of Traffic Conflicts, NATO ASI Series Vol. F5, Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany 1984, pp. 75–96.
16. Hydén C. The Development of a Method for Traffic Safety Evaluation: The Swedish Traffic Conflicts Technique. Bulletin 70, Department of Traffic Planning and Engineering, Lund Institute of Technology, 1987.
17. Williams M. J. Validity of the Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 13, No. 2, 1981, pp. 133–145.
18. Brown G. R. et al. Evaluation of Urban Intersection Improvements Using Traffic Conflicts, Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, 1986.
19. Gårder P. Pedestrian Safety at Traffic Signals: A Study Carried Out with the Help of a Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1989, pp. 435–444.
20. Davies S. E., Robertson D. H., and King E. K. Pedestrian/Vehicle Conflicts: An Accident Prediction Model. In Transportation Research Record 1210, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1989, pp. 1–11.
21. Zimolong B., Gstalter H., and Erke H. Traffic Conflicts at Urban Junctions—Reliability and Validity Studies. Institute of Psychology, University of Technology Brunswick, Germany, 1980.
22. Jones G. Driver Behaviour at Signalized Intersections. M.A.Sc. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1992.
23. Lord D. Pedestrian Conflicts and Left-Turning Traffic at Signalized Intersections. M.A.Sc. thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Toronto, Ont., Canada, 1994.
24. Brown G. R. Traffic Conflicts for Road User Safety Studies. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, Vol. 21, No. 1, 1994, pp. 1–15.
25. Hauer E., and Gårder P. Research into the Validity of the Traffic Conflicts Technique. Accident Analysis & Prevention, Vol. 18, No. 6, 1986, pp. 471–481.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Dominique Lord
Transport Safety Group, Department of Civil Engineering, 35 St. George Street, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada M5S 1A4.

Notes

Publication of this paper sponsored by Committee on Pedestrians.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 70

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 54

  1. Safety assessment of pedestrian-vehicle interaction at signalized inte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Unified strategy for cooperative optimization of pedestrian control pa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Cycle-level traffic conflict prediction at signalized intersections wi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. In Search of Severity Dimensions of Traffic Conflicts for Different Si...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Observed sidewalk autonomous delivery robot interactions with pedestri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Safety-critical events in bicycle lanes in Jongno, Seoul
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Identification and Comparative Safety Analysis of Overtaking Patterns ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Effect of Free Left-Turning Vehicles on Pedestrian Safety at Signalize...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Using a V2V- and V2I-based collision warning system to improve vehicle...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. A critical review on pedestrian crossing behaviour and pedestrian-vehi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Review of traffic safety evaluation at T-intersections using surrogate...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Comparison of the Performance of Hybrid Traffic Signal Patterns and Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Pedestrian-vehicle interaction severity level assessment at uncontroll...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Development of a conflict risk evaluation model to assess pedestrian s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Behavior model and guidance strategies of the crossing behavior at uns...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Modeling the Dynamic Exclusive Pedestrian Phase Based on Transportatio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Proactive pedestrian safety evaluation at urban road network level, an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. A New Pedestrian Crossing Level of Service (PCLOS) Method for Promotin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Method of Assessing Bus Stops Safety Based on Three Groups of Criteria
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Validation of surrogate measures of safety with a focus on bicyclist–m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Modeling traffic conflicts for use in road safety analysis: A review o...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Modeling Vehicle–Pedestrian Interactions using a Nonprobabilistic Regr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Planning for Safe and Secure Transport Infrastructure
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Safety of bicyclists in roundabouts with mixed traffic: Video analyses...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Crowdsourced bicycling crashes and near misses: trends in Canadian cit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Evaluation of pedestrian safety in unsignalized T and X – Intersection...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. The effects of left-turn traffic-calming treatments on conflicts and s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Pedestrian crossing design and analysis for symmetric intersections: E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Using PET-Measured Traffic Conflicts to Analyze Safety Performance of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Influence of pedestrian-to-vehicle technology on drivers’ response and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. In Search of the Consequence Severity of Traffic Conflict
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. A proactive approach to assess safety level of urban bus stops
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Analysis of Pedestrian Conflict with Right-Turning Vehicles at Signali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Application of partial proportional odds model for analyzing pedestria...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Automatic Vehicle-Pedestrian Conflict Identification With Trajectories...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. In search of surrogate safety indicators for vulnerable road users: a ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Chapter 10. Providing for Pedestrians
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Sharing is (s)caring? Interactions between buses and bicyclists on bus...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Evaluation of pedestrian safety at intersections: A theoretical framew...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Review of Pedestrian Level of Service: Perspective in Developing Count...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Investigating the Heterogeneity of Postencroachment Time Thresholds De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Comprehensive Safety Diagnosis Using Automated Video Analysis: Applica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Analyses of pedestrian behavior on mid-block unsignalized crosswalk co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Optimization of pedestrian phase patterns and signal timings for isola...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Automated Pedestrian Safety Analysis at a Signalized Intersection in N...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Safety Performance Study of Shared Pedestrian and Vehicle Space in New...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Traffic Conflicts in Street Designs wit...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Application of Computer Vision to Diagnosis of Pedestrian Safety Issue...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Relationship Between Road Traffic Accidents and Conflicts Recorded by ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Development and Implementation of a Vehicle–Pedestrian Conflict Analys...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Automated Analysis of Pedestrian–Vehicle Conflicts Using Video Data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. REDUCING CONFLICTS BETWEEN MOTOR VEHICLES AND PEDESTRIANS: THE SEPARAT...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Advance Yield Markings and Fluorescent Yellow-Green RA 4 Signs at Cros...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Advance Yield Markings: Reducing Motor Vehicle—Pedestrian Conflicts at...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub