Visual and Ecological Environmental Quality Model for Transportation Planning and Design
Abstract
Landscape aesthetics and environmental quality have both become central investigatory areas in transportation planning and design. Environmental designers are interested in applying research-based models to study the effects of specific transportation design treatments on the built and natural landscape. The development of a perception-based visual quality predictive equation is investigated for application in both naturalistic and designed landscapes for transportation planning and design projects. The prediction model contained total area of noospheric features and total area of motorized vehicles; presence of humans, wildlife, utility structures, and foreground flowers; total area of distant nonvegetation landscape features such as mountains and buttes; perimeter of intermediate nonvegetation; total area of foreground vegetation; and openness, mystery, and environmental quality indexes (p < 0.0001 for the overall regression, p ≤ 0.05 for each regressor using Type II sums of squares, and multiple. R-square of 0.67). Other variables such as motorized boats, nonflowering foreground herbaceous plants, a greenness index, fire, total area of exposed foreground substrate, smoke, water, smoothness, and the Shafer index were not significant regressors. By using a graph plotting the 95 percent confidence limits for the equation, an investigator can predict the statistical differences between a pair of images at a 90 percent confidence level.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Burley J. B. Visual Quality and Vegetation Strategies: Emerging Landscapes in the Urban Savanna. Parked Art: Beyond Asphalt and Plants: The Parking Lot as a Piece of Art! Proc., Third Annual Parking Lot Conference, Minnesota Landscape Arboretum, 1993, pp. 42–75.
2. McHarg I. L. Design with Nature. Natural History Press, 1969.
3. Shafer E. Jr. Perception of Natural Environments. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1969, pp. 71–82.
4. Shafer E. Jr., Hamilton J. F. Jr., and Schmidt E. A. Natural Landscape Preferences: A Predictive Model. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1969, pp. 1–19.
5. Shafer E. L. Jr., and Tooby M. Landscape Preference: An International Replication. Journal of Leisure Research, Vol. 5, No. 3, 1973, pp. 60–65.
6. Brush R. O., and Shafer E. L. Application of a Landscape-Preference Model to Land Management (Zube E. H., Brush R. O., and Fabos J. G., eds.). In Landscape Assessment: Values, Perceptions, and Resources, Dowden, Hutchinson and Ross, Inc., 1975, pp. 168–182.
7. Bourassa S. C. The Aesthetic of Landscape. Belhaven Press, 1991.
8. Weinstein N. D. The Statistical Prediction of Environmental Preferences: Problems of Validity and Application. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 8, No. 4, 1976, pp. 611–626.
9. Carlson A. On the Possibility of Quantifying Scenic Beauty. Landscape Planning, Vol. 4, No. 2, 1977, pp. 131–172.
10. Lang J. T. Creating Architectural Theory: The Role of the Behavioral Sciences in Environmental Design. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987.
11. Taylor J. G., Zube E. H., and Sell J. L. Landscape Assessment and Perception Research Methods. In Methods in Environmental and Behavioral Research (Bechtel R. B., Marans R. W., and Michelson W., eds.) Van Nostrand Reinhold Company, 1987, 361–393.
12. Visual Resource Management Program. Bureau of Land Management, 1980.
13. USDA. National Forest Landscape Management, Vol. 1. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Handbook 434, 1973.
14. National Forest Landscape Management, Vol. 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Handbook 462, 1974.
15. Smardon R. C., Palmer J. E., and Felleman J. P. Foundations for Visual Project Analysis. John Wiley and Sons, 1986.
16. Boster R. S., and Daniel T. C. Measuring Public Responses to Vegetative Management. Proc., 16th Annual Arizona Watershed Symposium. Arizona Water Commission, 1974.
17. Zube E. H. Cross-disciplinary and Intermode Agreement on the Description and Evaluation of Landscape Resources. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 6, No. 1, 1974, pp. 69–89.
18. Buhyoff G. J., Wellman J. D., and Daniel T. C. Predicting Scenic Quality for Mountain Pine Beetle and Western Spruce Budworm Damaged Forest Vistas. Forest Science, Vol. 28, 1982, pp. 827–838.
19. Vining J., and Stevens J. J. The Assessment of Landscape Quality: Major Methodological Considerations. In Foundations for Visual Project Analysis. (Smardon R. C., Palmer J. E., and Felleman J. P., eds.). John Wiley and Sons, 1986, pp. 167–186.
20. Latimer D. A., Hogo H., and Daniel T. C. The Effects of Atmospheric Optical Conditions on Perceived Scenic Quality. Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 15, 1981, pp. 1865–1874.
21. Malm W., Kelley K., Molenar J., and Daniel T. Human Perception of Visual Air Quality (Uniform Haze). Atmospheric Environment, Vol. 15, 1981, pp. 1875–1890.
22. Arthur L. M. Predicting Scenic Beauty of Forest Environment: Some Empirical Tests. Forest Science, Vol. 23, No. 2, pp. 151–160.
23. Daniel T. C., and Schroeder H. W. Scenic Beauty Estimation Model: Predicting Perceived Beauty of Forest Landscapes. In Our National Landscape, A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of Visual Resources. (Elsner G., and Smardon R. eds.) General Technical Report PSW-35, U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, Calif. 1979, pp. 512–523.
24. Brown T. C., and Daniel T. C. Landscape Aesthetics of Riparian Environments: Relationship of Flow Quantity to Scenic Quality Along a Wild and Scenic River. Water Resources Research, Vol. 27, No. 8, 1991, pp. 1787–1795.
25. Fisher J. D., Bell P. A., and Baum A. Environmental Psychology, 2nd ed. Holt, Rinehart, and Winston, 1984.
26. Pitt D. G., and Zube E. H. The Q-Sort Method: Use in the Landscape Assessment Research and Landscape Planning. In Our National Landscape, A Conference on Applied Techniques for Analysis and Management of Visual Resources (Elsner G., and Smardon R., eds.), General Technical Report PSW-35. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Forest and Range Experiment Station, Berkeley, Calif, 1979, pp. 227–234.
27. Daniel T. C., and Bolster R. S. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: the Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. Research Paper RM-167. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1976.
28. Brown T. C., and Daniel T. C. Scaling of Ratings: Concepts and Methods. Research Paper RM-293. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1990.
29. Brown T. C., Daniel T. C., Schroeder H. W., and Brink G. E. Analysis of Ratings: a Guide to RMRATE. Research Paper RM-195. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Forest and Range Experiment Station, 1990.
30. Zube E. H., and Mills L. V. Jr. Cross-Cultural Explorations in Landscape Perception. In Studies in Landscape Perception (Zube E. H. ed.). Publication No. R-76-1. Amherst: Institute for Man and Environment, University of Massachusetts, 1976, pp. 162–169.
31. Anderson T. W., Zube E. H., and MacConnell W. P. Predicting Scenic Resources Values. In Studies in Landscape Perception (Zube E. H., ed.). Publication No. R-76-1. Amherst: Institute for Man and Environment, University of Massachusetts, 1976.
32. Kaplan R., and Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature. Cambridge University Press, 1989.
33. Kaplan R., Kaplan S., and Brown T. J. Environmental Preference: A Comparison of Four Domains of Predictors. Environment and Behavior, Vol. 21, No. 5, 1989, pp. 509–530.
34. Brown T. Conceptualizing Smoothness and Density as Landscape Elements in Visual Resource Management. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 30, 1994, pp. 49–58.
35. Smardon R. C., and Karp J. P. The Legal Landscape. Van Nostrand Reinhold, 1990.
36. Sullivan W. C. III The Rural-Urban Fringe: Urban Growth and the Preservation of Agricultural Lands (Land Preservation). PhD. dissertation. University of Michigan, 1991.
37. Wolf K. Shoreline Residential Development: Landscape Management Alternatives and Public Preferences. PhD. dissertation. University of Michigan, 1993.
38. Bishop I. D., and Hulse D. W. Prediction of Scenic Beauty Using Mapped Data and Geographic Information Systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 30, 1994, pp. 59–70.
39. Crawford D. Using Remotely Sensed Data in Landscape Visual Quality Assessment. Landscape and Urban Planning Vol. 30, 1994, pp. 71–81.
40. Orland B. Visualization Techniques for Incorporation in Forest Planning Geographic Information Systems. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 30, 1994, pp. 83–97.
41. Kent R. Determining Scenic Quality Along Highways: A Cognitive Approach. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 27, 1994, pp. 29–45.
42. Smyser C. Nature's Design. Rodale Press. 1982.
43. SAS Institute Inc. SAS User's Guide: Statistics, 1982 ed.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 24
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 12
- Evaluation of the variables affecting usage preferences in reclaimed a...
- Respondent Dynamic Attention to Streetscape Composition in Nanjing, Ch...
- The American Landscape Architecture Research Universe and a Higher Edu...
- Predictive Models for Reforestation and Agricultural Reclamation: A Cl...
- Landscape Hazards: Destructive Build Environment Zones and Safe Areas ...
- Using GIS-based multicriteria decision support system for planning roa...
- Expert Opinion Dimensions of Rural Landscape Quality in Xiangxi, Hunan...
- Understanding Visual Engagement with Urban Street Edges along Non-Pede...
- A Visual Quality Prediction Map for Michigan, USA: An Approach to Vali...
- Infrastructures and environmental impact: the synergy of architectural...
- Assessing Public Response to Freeway Roadsides...
- Structured Public Involvement in Context-Sensitive Noise Wall Design U...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
