Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Incremental Regionalism: Staged Approach to Development of Regional Transportation Organizations

Abstract

Recent efforts to form a regional transportation organization for the greater Charlotte, North Carolina, region are discussed. The 13-county area, more than 126 km (75 mi) across, is uniformly low density and consists of 43 independent jurisdictions and cities, five state department of transportation districts, and five metropolitan planning organizations in two states. Regional travel patterns are just beginning to emerge along the highly radial road network. Since the late 1980s, at least four attempts to form consensus on regional transportation planning needs have been made but all have failed to galvanize. The history of these efforts is traced, and the causes of success and failure are reviewed. It is suggested that failure occurred primarily because the region is not yet truly integrated economically and the regional plans were politically too advanced. An incremental model of regional organization growth is then proposed. In this model organizational structure is related to the demography, commuter patterns, and physical, economic, and political regional integration over the next 30 years. Regions go through 17 definable steps as they emerge from separate cities and become part of large metropolises. The key roles of policy officials, businesses, staff, and others in facilitating regional planning in the absence of regional structure are explored.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Weiner E. Urban Transportation Planning: An Historical Overview. U.S. Department of Transportation, 1992.
2. Weitman J. P. A Profile of Metropolitan Planning Organizations. Center for Transportation Studies, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, 1982.
3. MPO Capacity: Improving the Capacity of Metropolitan Planning Organizations to Help Implement National Transportation Policy. Advisory Commission on Intergovernmental Relations, Washington, D.C., 1995.
4. McDowell B. D. Reinventing Planning under ISTEA: MPOs and State DOTs: ISTEA's Impact. TRNews, No. 175, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., Nov. 1994, pp. 6–9, 29.
5. Special Report 237: Moving Urban America: Proceedings of a Conference, Charlotte, North Carolina, May 6–8, 1992. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, 176 pp.
6. Transportation Research Circular 407: Transportation Data Needs: Programs for a New Era—Implications for State DOTs and MPOs. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, 90 pp.
7. Transporation Research Circular 406: Transportation Planning, Programming, and Finance. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, 77 pp.
8. Surveys and Summaries of State DOTs and MPOs. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1992, 1993.
9. Hartgen D. T. et al. Air Quality Planning: How Are the MPO's Responding? Proc., Conference on Planning Applications, Dallas, Tex., 1994.
10. McDowell B. D. MPOs and Weighted Voting. Intergovernmental Perspective, Spring 1994.
11. Howitt A. M., and Altschuler A. A. Regional Governance, Challenges of CAAA and ISTEA. TRNews, No. 167, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., July 1993, pp. 17–20.
12. Lyons W. M. FTA-FHWA Metropolitan Planning Organization Reviews: Planning Practice Under Intermodal Surface Transportation Efficiency Act and Clean Air Act Amendments. In Transportation Research Record 1466, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994, pp. 23–30.
13. Transportation Research Circular 450: Conference on Institutional Aspects of Metropolitan Transportation Planning, Williamsburg, Virginia, May 21-24, 1995. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, 62 pp.
14. Hartgen D. T., and McCoy W. J. Uncharted Waters: The Super-Regional Transportation Agency. Transportation Quarterly Vol. 44, No. 3, 1990, pp. 363–388.
15. Krauss R., and McAdams A. Overview of Transportation Planning for the Greater Charlotte NC Region. Report 77. Center for Transportation Studies, University of North Carolina–Charlotte, 1992.
16. Floyd N. D., Newsome T., Drymon D., Hartgen D. T., and Timmerman H. E. Starting a Regional Transportation Planning Organization. In Transportation Research Record 1364, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1992, pp. 53–62.
17. Harrelson T. J. Suggestions for Implementing the Activities of the Committee of 100. Carolinas Transportation Compact, University of North Carolina–Charlotte Urban Institute, Charlotte, 1994.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

David T. Hartgen
Center for Interdisciplinary Transportation Studies, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, N.C. 28223
William J. McCoy
Urban Institute, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, N.C. 28223
Wayne A. Walcott
Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, University of North Carolina, Charlotte, N.C. 28223.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 3

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub