Operationalizing Concepts of Equity for Public Project Investments
Abstract
Decisions for evaluating public project investment most frequently use benefit-cost analysis. The procedure rests on the assumption that an efficient alternative should be selected that maximizes the net aggregate benefits to society as a whole. However, this selection results in projects that invariably provide different levels of benefits to members of a community, thus contravening the principles of equity or distributive justice. Six strategies for dealing with the problem of distributive justice are explored and examined and then applied in a common setting to a public project where several efficient alternatives are proposed. While this research is not prompted by the desire to proclaim a winner from among the strategies, it is evident that some strategies make heroic attempts to reduce inequity. Issues connected with obtaining public consensus are also briefly mentioned.
Get full access to this article
View all access and purchase options for this article.
References
1. Stokey E., and Zeckhauser R. A Primer for Policy Analysis. W. W. Norton and Co., New York, 1978.
2. Dasgupta A., and Pearce D. W. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Theory and Practice. Macmillan, London, England, 1971.
3. Mishan E. J. Economics for Social Decisions: Elements of Cost-Benefit Analysis. Praeger Publishers, New York, 1972.
4. Hensher D. A., ed. Urban Transport Economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, 1977.
5. Stubbs P. C., Tyson T. J., and Dalvi M. Q. Transport Economics. Allen and Unwin, London, England, 1980.
6. Khisty C. J. Transportation Engineering: An Introduction. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N.J., 1990.
7. Sugden R., and Williams A. The Principles of Practical Cost-Benefit Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, 1978.
8. Pearce D. W. Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2nd ed. Macmillan, London, England, 1983.
9. Bolan R. S. The Structure of Ethical Choice in Planning Practice. Journal of Planning Education and Research, Vol. 1, 1983, pp. 23–24.
10. Lichfield N., Kettle P., and Whitbread M. Evaluation in the Planning Process. Pergamon Press, Oxford, England, 1975.
11. Lee D. B. Making the Concept of Equity Operational. In Transportation Research Record 677, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1978, pp. 48–53.
12. Miller D. Social Justice. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, 1976.
13. Gunn A. S., and Vesilind P. A. Environmental Ethics for Engineers. Lewis Publishers, Chelsea, Mich., 1987.
14. Frohlich N., and Oppenheimer J. A. Choosing Justice: An Experimental Approach to Ethical Theory. University of California Press, Berkeley, 1992.
15. Rawls J. A theory of Justice. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass., 1971.
16. Beatley T. Applying Moral Principles to Growth Management. Journal of the American Planning Association. Vol. 50, No. 4, 1984, 459–469.
17. Popkin R. H., and Stroll A. Philosophy Made Simple, 2nd ed. Double-day, New York, 1993.
18. Martin M. W., and Schinzinger R. Ethics in Engineering, 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York, 1989.
19. Moser C. A. Some Personal Developments in Social Statistics, Social Trends. HMSO, London, England, 1970.
20. Khisty C. J. Public Decisions for Labor Intensive Transportation Systems. Civil Engineering for Practicing and Design Engineers, Vol. 4, 1985, pp. 301–310.
21. Dalkey N. C. The Use of Self-Ratings to Improve Group Estimates. Technological Forecasting, Vol. 12, 1969, pp. 283–291.
22. Linstone H. A., and Turoff M., eds. The Delphi Method: Technique and Applications. Addison-Wesley, New York, 1975.
23. Gustafson D. H., Shukla R. K., Delbecq A., and Walster G. W. A Comparative Study of Difference in Subjective Likelihood Estimates Made by Individuals, Interactive Groups, Delphi Groups and Nominal Groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, Vol. 9, 1973, pp. 200–291.
24. Mohammadi J., Longinow A., and Williams T. A. Evaluation of System Reliability Using Expert Opinions. In Structural Safety, 9, Elsevier Science Publishers, 1991, pp. 227–241.
25. Khisty C. J. Citizen Participation Using a Soft Systems Perspective. In Transportation Research Record 1400, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1993, pp. 53–57.
26. Khisty C. J., and Leleur S. Identifying a New Role of the Future Planner. Proc., Conference on Infrastructure Planning and Management, Denver, Colo., 1993.
Cite article
Cite article
Cite article
OR
Download to reference manager
If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice
Information, rights and permissions
Information
Published In
Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996
Authors
Metrics and citations
Metrics
Journals metrics
This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.
VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICSArticle usage*
Total views and downloads: 111
*Article usage tracking started in December 2016
Altmetric
See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores
Articles citing this one
Receive email alerts when this article is cited
Web of Science: 0
Crossref: 6
- What can urban policies and planning really learn from John Rawls? A m...
- Exploring equity: How equity norms have been applied implicitly and ex...
- Justice in public transport systems: A comparative study of Auckland, ...
- An empirical assessment of Dutch citizens' preferences for spatial equ...
- A multi-dimensional view of transport-related social exclusion: A comp...
- A systemic overview of non‐motorized transportation for developing cou...
Figures and tables
Figures & Media
Tables
View Options
Get access
Access options
If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:
loading institutional access options
Alternatively, view purchase options below:
Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.
Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.
