Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published January 1996

Development of Project Priority-Setting Methodology for Pennsylvania's Airport Development Program

Abstract

The methodology used to develop a decision making tool for choosing among candidate projects for a state airport development program is presented. The approach emphasized public involvement and cooperation, using a panel of experts from the aviation community to establish guiding principles, select the analysis procedure, develop evaluation criteria, and choose criteria weights for the new priority-setting model. The panel included airport managers, metropolitan planning organization aviation planners, aviation consultants, and state aviation planners.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Review and Comment on the Bureau of Aviation's Project Prioritization Process. Aviation Development Council of Pennsylvania, 1993.
2. Winfrey R., and Zellner C. NCHRP Report 122: Summary and Evaluation of Economic Consequences of Highway Improvements. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1971.
3. Gittings G., and Cullison J. T. A Review of State Aviation Priorities and Processes. Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, 1994.
4. Saaty T. L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, N.Y., 1980.
5. Hagquist R. F. High Precision Prioritizing Using the Analytic Hierarchy Process: Determining State HPMS Component Weighting Factors. Texas Department of Transportation, Jan. 1994.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published: January 1996
Issue published: January 1996

Rights and permissions

© 1996 National Academy of Sciences.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

James T. Cullison
Texas Transportation Institute, Texas A&M University System, 701 N. Post Oak, Suite 430, Houston, Tex. 77024.
Gary L. Gittings
Pennsylvania Transportation Institute, Pennsylvania State University, Research Office Bldg., University Park, Pa. 16802.

Notes

Publication of this paper sponsored by Committee on Aviation Economics and Forecasting.

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 13

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub