Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online May 6, 2014

Women’s Land Ownership and Relationship Power: A Mixed Methods Approach to Understanding Structural Inequities and Violence Against Women

Abstract

Violence against women is a widespread societal problem substantiated and perpetuated through inequities that operate within numerous levels of the society. Challenging and ending gender-based violence therefore requires addressing social structures that perpetuate gendered hierarchies and maintain women’s susceptibility to experiencing violence worldwide. The present study examines novel approaches taken by women in two different countries in the Global South, one in Nicaragua and another in Tanzania, to examine macro-level processes involved in land ownership in regions where owning land is a marker of dominance. Using data from 492 women, results from structural equation models and qualitative thematic analyses demonstrate significant links among women’s ownership of land, relationship power, and receipt of physical and psychological violence in both the countries. Collectively, the findings suggest that when women own land, they gain power within their relationships and are less likely to experience violence. Implications for theoretical conceptualizations of eradicating violence against women and practical interventions are discussed.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Agarwal B. (1994). Field of one's own: Property rights in South Asia. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Ahrens C. E. (2006). Being silenced: The impact of negative social reactions on the disclosure of rape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 263–274.
Alvarez S. (2009). Beyond NGOization? Reflections from Latin America. Development, 52, 175–184.
Annan K. (2000). Address by Mr. Kofi Annan, Secretary General of the United Nations. Speech presented at the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Bangkok, Thailand. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/docs/ux_tdl365.en.pdf
Apfelbaum E. (1979). Relations of domination and movements for liberation: An analysis of power between groups. In Austin W. G., Worchel S. (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (I. Lubek, Trans.) (pp. 188–204). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Babcock J. C., Waltz J., Jacobson N. S., Gottman J. M. (1993). Power and violence: The relation between communication patterns, power discrepancies, and domestic violence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 40–50.
Bentler P. M., Chou C. P. (1987). Practical issues in structural modeling. Sociological Methods & Research, 16, 78–117.
Braun V., Clarke V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3, 71–101.
Broegaard R. B. (2009). Land access and titling in Nicaragua. Development and Change, 40, 149–169.
Carmines E. G., McIver J. P. (1981). Analyzing models with unobserved variables: Analysis of covariance structures. In Bohrnstedt G. W., Borgatta E. F. (Eds.), Social measurement: Current issues (pp. 65–115). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Castro R., Casique I., Brindis C. D. (2008). Empowerment and physical violence throughout women's reproductive life in Mexico. Violence Against Women, 14, 655–677.
Chrisler J. C., Ferguson S. (2006). Violence against women as a public health issue. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1087, 235–249.
Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ:Erlbaum.
Cohen J. (1990). Things I have learned (so far). American Psychologist, 45, 1304–1312.
Cole E. R. (2009). Intersectionality and research in psychology. American Psychologist, 64, 170–180.
Coleman D. H., Straus M. A. (1986). Marital power, conflict, and violence in a nationally representative sample of American couples. Violence and Victims, 1, 141–157.
Connell R. (1987). Gender and power: The society, the person, and sexual politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Connell R. (2009). Gender: In world perspective. Cambridge, England: Polity.
Connell R. (2012). Gender, health and theory: Conceptualizing the issue, in local and world perspective. Social Science & Medicine, 74, 1675–1683.
Cortina L. M., Curtin N., Stewart A. J. (2012). Where is social structure in personality research? A feminist analysis of publication trends. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 259–273.
Crenshaw K. W. (1995). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. In Crenshaw K. W., Gotanda N., Peller G., Thomas K. (Eds.), Critical race theory: The key writings that formed the movement (pp. 359–383). New York, NY: New Press.
Deere C. D., Leon M. (2001). Who owns the land? Gender and land-titling programmes in Latin America. Journal of Agrarian Change, 1, 440–467.
Dunkle K. L., Jewkes R. K., Brown H. C., Gray G. E., McIntyre J. A., Harlow S. D. (2004). Gender-based violence, relationship power, and risk of HIV infection in women attending antenatal clinics in South Africa. The Lancet, 363, 1415–1421.
Dworkin S., Grabe S., Lu T., Hatcher A., Kwena Z., Bukusi E.…Mwaura-Muiru E. (2013). Property rights violations in Nyanza and Western Provinces, Kenya: A qualitative examination of this critical structural driver of women's HIV risks. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 703–713.
Ellsberg M., Heise L. (2005). Researching violence against women: A practical guide or researchers and activists. Washington, DC: WHO, PATH.
Else-Quest N. M., Grabe S. (2012). The political is personal: Measurement and application of national-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 131–144.
Englert B., Daley E. (2008). Women's land rights & privatization in Eastern Africa. Oxford, UK: James Currey.
Ferree M., Tripp A. (2006). Global feminism: Transnational women's activism, organizing, and human rights. New York: New York University Press.
Fine M. (1989). The politics of research and activism: Violence against women. Gender and Society, 3, 549–558.
Flake D. F. (2005). Individual, family, and community risk factors for domestic violence in Peru. Violence Against Women, 11, 353–373.
Francis J. J., Johnston M., Robertson C., Glidewell L., Entwistle V., Eccles M. P.…Grimshaw J. M. (2010). What is an adequate sample size? Operationalizing data saturation for theory-based interview studies. Psychology and Health, 25, 1229–1245.
Frieze I. H., McHugh M. C. (1992). Power and influence strategies in violent and nonviolent marriages. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 449–465.
Gage A. J., Hutchinson P. L. (2006). Power, control, and intimate partner sexual violence in Haiti. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 35, 11–24.
Glick P., Fiske S. (1999). Gender, power dynamics, and social interaction. In Ferree M. M., Lorber J. (Eds.), Revisioning gender (pp. 365–398). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Goméz A., Racionero S., Sordé T. (2010). Ten years of critical communicative methodology. International Review of Qualitative Research, 3, 17–43.
Grabe S. (2010a). Promoting gender equality: The role of status, power, and control in the link between land ownership and violence in Nicaragua. Analysis of Social Issues and Public Policy, 10, 146–170.
Grabe S. (2010b). Women’s human rights and empowerment in a transnational, globalized context: What’s psychology got to do with it? In Paludi M. (Ed.), Feminism and women’s rights worldwide (Vol. 2, pp. 17–46). Santa Barbara, CA: Praeger.
Grabe S., Else-Quest N. M. (2012). The role of transnational feminism in psychology: Complimentary visions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 158–161.
Griscom J. L. (1992). Women and power: Definition, dualism, and difference. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 16, 389–389.
Grose R. G., Grabe S. (2014). The explanatory role of relationship power and control in domestic violence against women in Nicaragua: A feminist psychology analysis. Violence Against Women, 20, 972–993.
Heise L. (1998). Violence against women: An integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women, 4, 262–290.
Hodgson D. L. (2011). Gender and culture at the limit of rights. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Holmbeck G. N. (1997). Toward terminological, conceptual, and statistical clarity in the study of mediators and moderators: Examples from the child-clinical and pediatric psychology literatures. Journal of Consulting & Clinical Psychology, 65, 599–610.
Hu L. T., Bentler P. M. (1999). Cut-off criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.
Jejeebhoy S. J. (1998). Wife-beating in rural India: A husband’s right? Economic and Political Weekly, 33, 855–862.
Jenkins S. R. (2000). Introduction to the special issue: Defining gender, relationships, and power. Sex Roles, 42, 467–493.
Jewkes R., Dunkle K., Nduna M., Shai N. (2010). Intimate partner violence, relationship power inequity, and incidence of HIV infection in young women in South Africa: A cohort study. The Lancet, 376, 41–48.
Jordan C. E. (2009). Advancing the study of violence against women evolving research agendas into science. Violence Against Women, 15, 393–419.
Koss M. P. (1990). The women's mental health research agenda: Violence against women. American Psychologist, 45, 374–380.
Lastarria-Cornhiel S. (1997). Impact of privatization on gender and property rights in Africa. World Development, 25, 1317–1333.
Lugones M. (2010). Toward a decolonial feminism. Hypatia, 25, 742–759.
Manji A. S. (1998). Gender and the politics of the land reform process in Tanzania. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 36, 645–667.
Marecek J. (2011). Numbers and interpretations: What is at stake in our ways of knowing? Theory & Psychology, 21, 220–240.
Marecek J. (2012). The global is local adding culture, ideology, and context to international psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 149–153.
Maxwell J. (2004). Causal explanation, qualitative research, and scientific inquiry in education. Educational Researcher, 33, 3–11.
Moane G. (1999). Gender and colonialism: A psychological analysis of oppression and liberation. London, England: Macmillan.
Mohanty C. T. (2003). “Under western eyes” revisited: Feminist solidarity through anticapitalist struggles. Signs, 28, 499–535.
Muthén L. K., Muthén B. O. (2010). Mplus user’s guide (6th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Naples N. A., Desai M. (2002). Women's activism and globalization: Linking local struggles and transnational politics. New York, NY: Routledge.
Palmer R. (2008). Foreword. In Englert E. D. E. (Ed.), Women's rights to land & privatization in Eastern Africa (pp. 1–4). Oxford, England: James Currey.
Panda P., Agarwal B. (2005). Marital violence, human development, and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33, 823–850.
Pandey S. (2010). Rising property ownership among women in Kathmandu, Nepal: An exploration of causes and consequences. International Journal of Social Welfare, 19, 281–291.
Peña N., Maiques M., Castillo G. E. (2008). Using rights-based and gender-analysis arguments for land rights for women: Some initial reflections from Nicaragua. Gender & Development, 16, 55–71.
Pettigrew T. F. (1991). Toward unity and bold theory: Popperian suggestions for two persistent problems of social psychology. In Stephan C. W., Stephan W. G., Pettigrew T. F. (Eds.), The future of social psychology (pp. 13–27). New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Preacher K. J., Hayes A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891.
Pulerwitz J., Gortmaker S. L., DeJong W. (2000). Measuring sexual relationship power in HIV/STD research. Sex Roles, 42, 637–660.
Steiger J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 173–180.
Stewart A. J. (1998). Doing personality research: How can feminist theories help? In Norem J. K., Clinchy B. M. (Eds.), The gender and psychology reader (pp. 54–68). New York: New York University Press.
Stewart A. J., Cole E. (2007). Narratives and numbers: Feminist multiple methods research. In Hesse-Biber S. N. (Ed.), The handbook of feminist research (pp. 327–354). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Straus M. A., Hamby S. L., Boney-McCoy S., Sugarman D. B. (1996). The revised conflict tactics scales (CTS2): Development and preliminary psychometric data. Journal of Family Issues, 17, 283–316.
Tabachnick B. G., Fidell L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Tripp A. (2004). Women’s movements, customary law, and land rights in Africa: The case of Uganda. African Studies Quarterly, 7, 1–19.
United Nations Development Fund for Women. (2006). Violence against women: Facts and figures. New York: NY: UNIFEM.
Wingood G. M., DiClemente R. J. (2000). Application of the theory of gender and power to examine HIV-related exposures, risk factors, and effective interventions for women. Health Education & Behavior, 27, 539–565.
World Health Organization. (2005). WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence against women: Summary report of initial results on prevalence, health outcomes and women’s responses. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
World Health Organization. (2012, November). Intimate partner violence: Understanding and addressing violence against women. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/reproductive-health/publications/violence/rhr12_36/en/index.html
Yoder J. D., Kahn A. S. (2003). Making gender comparisons more meaningful: A call for more attention to social context. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 27, 281–290.

Supplementary Material

Teaching Supplement

Files in this Data Supplement:

File (533485_39_1_grabe_grose_dutt.pptx)

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: May 6, 2014
Issue published: March 2015

Keywords

  1. intimate partner violence
  2. power
  3. relationship quality
  4. human rights
  5. sexism
  6. ownership
  7. cross-cultural differences

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2014.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Shelly Grabe
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Rose Grace Grose
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
Anjali Dutt
Department of Psychology, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA

Notes

Shelly Grabe, University of California, Santa Cruz, 1156 High St., Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Psychology of Women Quarterly.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 2249

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 52 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 54

  1. Property status and wife beating justification in Ghana: an integrated...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. The nexus of women’s empowerment and sustainable agricultural practice...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Gender-based violence in food systems
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. An Exploratory Study of Financial Health as an Antecedent of Economic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  5. Psychology of Women Quarterly: Citation Network Analysis of Its Landsc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. The effect of negative human recognition on farmland access and well‐b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. A Review of Evidence on Gender Equality, Women’s Empowerment, and Food...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. Violence, Land and Gender: Exploring Connections
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Family, Housing, and Social Policy for Women of Pakistan
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Power, Gender, and Intimate Partner Abuse: Empowerment, Patriarchy, an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Can Legislation Reduce Domestic Violence in Developing Countries?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. “It's a place to feel like part of the community”: Counterspace, inclu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Help or harm? The impact of property titling on women's acceptance of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. A review of evidence on gender equality, women’s empowerment, and food...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Women’s economic status, male authority patterns and intimate partner ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. Women as Agents of Change: Exploring Women Leaders’ Resistance and Sha...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. In between rights and power: Women’s land rights and the gendered poli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Future Directions in Interpersonal Violence Prevention Across the Life...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. The Dynamics of Access and Exclusion of Women to Land Resources. A Cas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Intersectional and Entangled Risks: An Empirical Analysis of Disasters...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Problematizing Indigeneity in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for nat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. R.E.S.P.e.c.T and intimate partner violence: a cross-sectional study u...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Gender Empowerment in Agriculture Interventions: What Are We Still Mis...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Public Attitudes towards Intimate Partner Violence against Women and I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Research Methods in the Study of Intersectionality in Psychology: Exam...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Identifying Human Recognition Deprived Women: Evidence from Malawi and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Grappling with the challenges of measuring women's economic empowermen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. A relational perspective on women’s empowerment: Intimate partner viol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. Agricultural wealth better predicts mental wellbeing than market wealt...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Future Directions in Interpersonal Violence Prevention Across the Life...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Armed Conflict, Intimate Partner Violence, and Mental Distress of Wome...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Examining intersections between violence against women and violence ag...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Gender-Related Ideological and Structural Macrosocial Factors Associat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Women's land rights as a pathway to poverty reduction: Framework and r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Converging drivers of interpersonal violence: Findings from a qualitat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Overcoming Essentialism in Community Psychology: The Use of a Narrativ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Intimate Partner Violence Against Women in Northwestern Botswana: The ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  38. Hunger for farmland among female farmers in Limpopo Province: bodies, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Mixed Methods Designs for Making Cross-Cultural Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. More Property, Better Sex? The Relationship Between Property Ownership...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Power and Rights in the Community: Paralegals as Leaders in Women’s Le...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Risk Factors for Violence Against Refugee Women
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Provider Perspectives on Intimate Partner Violence in Bluefields, Nica...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. “I Felt Close to Death”: A Phenomenological Study of Female Strangulat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Gender-Based Violence and Armed Conflict...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  46. Gender Ideology and Social Transformation: Using Mixed Methods to Expl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Women’s Individual Asset Ownership and Experience of Intimate Partner ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Gendered knowledge and adaptive practices: Differentiation and change ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Exploring Links between Women's Business Ownership and Empowerment amo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Intersectionality in Quantitative Psychological Research...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Transnational Feminism in Psychology: Moving Beyond Difference to Inve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Looking Backward and Moving Forward...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Participation: Structural and relational power and Maasai women’s poli...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

SPW members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

SPW members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text