![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Key concerns about the psychometric properties of the 25-item version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) have consistently been raised in the literature. The present study aimed at examining the meaningfulness of an alternative model to the SDQ in which 7 problematic items are excluded. French-speaking parents of 262 boys and 263 girls aged 6 to 16 years completed the SDQ. Through confirmatory factor analyses (CFAs), results provided support for a new, reduced, and psychometrically sound version of the SDQ called SDQ-R that displayed good factorial validity, construct validity, reliability, and multi-group invariance across gender. Overall, the attractive features of the SDQ-R make it a promising instrument for quickly screening emotional and behavioral problems in children and adolescents.
References
Section:
|
Brown, T. A. (2006). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus. New York, NY: Psychology Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Capron, C., Thérond, C., Duyme, M. (2007). Psychometric properties of the French version of the self-report and teacher Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ). European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 23, 79-88. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cheung, G. W., Rensvold, R. B. (2002). Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 233-255. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
D’Acremont, M., Van der Linden, M. (2008). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community sample of French-speaking adolescents. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 1-8. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Dickey, W. C., Blumberg, S. J. (2004). Revisiting the factor structure of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: United States, 2001. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 43, 1159-1167. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Goodman, A., Lamping, D., Ploubidis, G. (2010). When to use broader internalising and externalising subscales instead of the hypothesised five subscales on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): Data from British parents, teachers and children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 38, 1179-1191. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Goodman, R. (1997). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: A research note. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 38, 581-586. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
McCrory, C., Layte, R. (2012). Testing competing models of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire’s (SDQ’s) factor structure for the parent-informant instrument. Personality and Individual Differences, 52, 882-887. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Millsap, R. E., Yun-Tein, J. (2004). Assessing factorial invariance in ordered-categorical measures. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 39, 479-515. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Mojtabai, R. (2006). Serious emotional and behavioral problems and mental health contacts in American and British children and adolescents. Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 45, 1215-1223. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O. (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author. Google Scholar | |
|
Percy, A., McCrystal, P., Higgins, K. (2008). Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the adolescent self-report Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 24, 43-48. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Rønning, J. A., Handegaard, B. H., Sourander, A., Mørch, W.-T. (2004). The Strengths and Difficulties Self-Report Questionnaire as a screening instrument in Norwegian community samples. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 13, 73-82. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Sass, D. A. (2011). Testing measurement invariance and comparing latent factor means within a Confirmatory Factor Analysis framework. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 347-363. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Stone, L., Otten, R., Ringlever, L., Hiemstra, M., Engels, R., Vermulst, A., Janssens, J. (2013). The parent version of the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire: Omega as an alternative to Alpha and a test for measurement invariance. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 29, 44-50. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Van Leeuwen, K., Meerschaert, T., Bosmans, G., De Medts, L., Braet, C. (2006). The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire in a community sample of young children in Flanders. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 22, 189-197. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Yang, Y., Green, S. B. (2011). Coefficient alpha: A reliability coefficient for the 21st century? Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 377-392. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Yu, C.-Y. (2002). Evaluating cutoff criteria of model fit indices for latent variable models with binary and continuous outcomes (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from http://www.statmodel.com/download/Yudissertation.pdf Google Scholar |
