The present study examined the structure of the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence–Second Edition (CTONI-2) normative sample using exploratory factor analysis, multiple factor extraction criteria, and higher-order exploratory factor analytic techniques that were not reported in the in the CTONI-2 Examiner’s Manual. Results indicated that retention of the hypothesized CTONI-2 measurement model resulted in several theoretically inconsistent factor loadings, low factor loadings, and the retention of impermissible factors (e.g., factors with no salient loadings). Hierarchical exploratory analyses with the Schmid and Leiman procedure found that the second-order g factor accounted for large portions of total and common variance, in contrast to the two first-order factors that accounted for small portions of dimensional variance. Results suggest that the CTONI-2 provides a strong measure of general intelligence and clinical interpretation should be limited to that level of the measurement instrument.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement on Education . (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Google Scholar
Beaujean, A. A., Firmin, M. W., Attai, S., Johnson, C. B., Firmin, R. L., Mena, K. E. (2011). Using personality and cognitive ability to predict academic achievement in a young adult sample. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 709-714. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2011.06.023
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bentler, P. M., Kano, Y. (1990). On the equivalence of factors and components. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 67-74. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_8
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Canivez, G. L. (2011). Hierarchical factor structure of the cognitive assessment system: Variance partitions from the Schmid-Leiman (1957) procedure. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 305-317. doi:10.1037/a0025973
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Canivez, G. L. (2013). Psychometric versus actuarial interpretation of intelligence and related aptitude batteries. In Saklofske, D. H., Reynolds, C. R., Schwean, V. L. (Eds.), The oxford handbook of child psychological assessment (pp. 84-112). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carroll, J. B. (1995). On methodology in the study of cognitive abilities. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 429-452. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3003_6
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Cattell, R. B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1, 245-276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Chen, F. F., Hayes, A., Carver, C. S., Laurenceau, J.-P., Zhang, Z. (2012). Modeling general and specific variance in multifaceted constructs: A comparison of the bifactor model to other approaches. Journal of Personality, 80, 219-251. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2011.00739.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Clark, L. A., Watson, D. (1995). Constructing validity: Basic issues in Objective Scale Development. Psychological Assessment, 7, 309-319. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Costello, A. B., Osborne, J. W. (2005). Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 10, 1-9. Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/pdf/v10n7.pdf
Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J., Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281-302. doi:10.1037/h0040957
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Delan, E., Kaya, F., Ritter, N. L. (2012). Test review: Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Second Edition (CTONI-2). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 30, 209-213. doi:10.1177/0734282911415614
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
DeThorne, L. S., Schaefer, B. A. (2004). A guide to child nonverbal IQ measures. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 13, 275-290. doi:10.1044/1058-0360(2004/029)
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Dombrowski, S. C., Watkins, M. W., Brogan, M. J. (2009). An exploratory investigation of the factor structure of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales (RIAS). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 27, 497-507. doi:10.1177/0734282909333179
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Google Scholar
Fabrigar, L. R., Wegener, D. T., MacCallum, R. C., Strahan, E. J. (1999). Evaluating the use of exploratory factor analysis in psychological research. Psychological Methods, 4, 272-299. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A. (2007). Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring? Intelligence, 35, 169-182. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.002
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., McDermott, P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. Journal of Special Education, 40, 103-114. doi:10.1177/00224669060400020101
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Golay, P., Reverte, I., Rossier, J., Favez, N., Lecerf, T. (2013). Further insights on the French WISC-IV factor structure through Bayesian structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 25, 496-508. doi:10.1037/a0030676
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gorsuch, R. L. (1983). Factor analysis (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Gorsuch, R. L. (1997). Exploratory factor analysis: Its role in item analysis. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68, 532-560. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_5
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gorsuch, R. L. (2003). Factor analysis. In Schinka, J. A., Velicer, F. F. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology: Vol. 2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 143-164). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Guttman, L. (1954). Some necessary and sufficient conditions for common factor analysis. Psychometrika, 19, 149-161. doi:10.1007/BF02289162
Google Scholar | Crossref
Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A. (2009). Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence-Second Edition. In Naglieri, J. A., Goldstein, S. (Eds.), Practitioner’s guide to assessing intelligence and achievement (pp. 233-264). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., Wiederholt, J. L. (1997). Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Google Scholar
Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., Wiederholt, J. L. (2009a). Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Google Scholar
Hammill, D. D., Pearson, N. A., Wiederholt, J. L. (2009b). Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence examiner’s manual (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
Google Scholar
Ho, R. (2014). Handbook of univariate and multivariate data analysis with IBM SPSS (2nd ed.). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychomerika, 30, 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Jensen, A. R. (1980). Bias in mental testing. New York, NY: Free Press.
Google Scholar
Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CT: Praeger.
Google Scholar
Kellow, J. T. (2005). Exploratory factor analysis in two prominent measurement journals: Hegemony by default. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods, 4, 283-287. Retrieved from http://digitalcommons.wayne.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1178&;context=jmasm
Google Scholar
Lakin, J. M. (2012). Multidimensional ability tests and culturally and linguistically diverse students: Evidence of measurement invariance. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 397-403. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.12.003
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lakin, J. M., Gambrell, J. L. (2012). Distinguishing verbal, quantitative, and figural facets of fluid intelligence n young students. Intelligence, 40, 560-570. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2012.07.005
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lassiter, K. S., Harrison, T. K., Matthews, T. D., Bell, N. L. (2001). The validity of the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence as a measure of fluid intelligence. Assessment, 8, 95-103. doi:10.1177/107319110100800109
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Lassiter, K. S., Matthews, T. D., Feeback, G. (2007). An examination of the CTONI utilizing Gc-Gf theory: A comparison of the CTONI and WJ-III. Psychology in the Schools, 44, 567-577. doi:10.1002/pits.20248
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
MacCallum, R. C., Roznowski, M., Necowitz, L. B. (1992). Model modifications in covariance structure analysis: The problem of capitalization on chance. Psychological Bulletin, 111, 490-504. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.111.3.490
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
McArdle, J. J. (1990). Principles versus principals of structural factor analysis. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 81-87. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_10
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
McCallum, S., Bracken, B., Wasserman, J. (2001). Essentials of nonverbal assessment. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
McDonald, R. P. (1999). Test theory: A unified treatment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Nelson, J. M., Canivez, G. L., Lindstrom, W., Hatt, C. V. (2007). Higher-order exploratory analysis of the Reynolds Intellectual Assessment Scales with a referred sample. Journal of School Psychology, 45, 439-456. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2007.03.003
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavioral Research Methods, 32, 396-402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ortiz, S. O., Ochoa, S. H., Dynda, A. M. (2012). Testing with culturally and linguistically diverse populations: Moving beyond the verbal-performance dichotomy into evidence-based practice. In Flangan, D. P., Harrison, P. L. (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (3rd ed., pp. 526-552). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Pearson, N. (2003). Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence. In McCallum, R. S. (Ed.), Handbook of nonverbal assessment (pp. 141-162). New York, NY: Plenum.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Preacher, K. J., MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43. doi:10.1207/S15328031US0201_02
Google Scholar | Crossref
Raiche, G., Walls, T. A., Magis, D., Riopel, M., Blais, J. (2012). Non-graphical solutions for Cattell’s scree test. Methodology, 9, 23-29. doi:10.1027/1614-2241/a000051
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129-140. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Rossen, E. A., Shearer, D. K., Penfield, R. D., Kranzler, J. H. (2005). Validity of the Comprehensive Test of Nonverbal Intelligence (CTONI). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 23, 161-172. doi:10.1177/073428290502300205
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Schmid, J., Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53-61. doi:10.1007/BF02289209
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured. American Journal of Psychology, 15, 201-293. Retrieved from http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Spearman
Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B. G., Fiddell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Google Scholar
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 321-327. doi:10.1007/BF02293557
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Velicer, W. F., Jackson, D. N. (1990). Component analysis versus common factor analysis: Some further observations. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25, 89-95. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2501_12
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis [Computer software]. State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
Google Scholar
Watkins, M. W. (2004). MacOrtho [Computer software]. State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
Google Scholar
Watkins, M. W. (2007). SEscree [Computer software]. Phoenix, AZ: Ed & Psych Associates.
Google Scholar
Watkins, M. W. (2013). Omega [Computer software]. Phoenix, AZ: Ed & Psych Associates.
Google Scholar
Weiss, L. G., Keith, T. Z., Zhu, J., Chen, H. (2013a). WAIS-IV and clinical validation of the four- and five-factor interpretative approaches. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 93-113. doi:10.1177/0734282913478030
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Weiss, L. G., Keith, T. Z., Zhu, J., Chen, H. (2013b). WISC-IV and clinical validation of the four- and five-factor interpretative approaches. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 114-131. doi:10.1177/0734282913478032
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Widaman, K. F. (1993). Common factor analysis versus principal component analysis: Differential bias in representing model parameters? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 28, 263-311. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2803_1
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Zoski, K. W., Jurs, S. (1996). An objective counterpart to the visual scree test for factor analysis: The standard error scree. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 56, 443-451. doi:10.1177/0013164496056003006
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zwick, W. R., Velicer, W. F. (1986). Comparison of five rules for determining the number of components to retain. Psychological Bulletin, 99, 432-442. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.99.3.432
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JPA-article-ppv for $36.00