![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Many Flynn effect (FE) studies compare scores across different editions of Wechsler’s IQ tests. When construct changes are introduced by the test developers in the new edition, however, the presumed generational effects are difficult to untangle from changes due to test content. To remove this confound, we use the same edition of Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition (WISC-IV) across an 11-year period. Whereas previous research has reported the FE to be less than half the theoretical rate when comparing WISC-IV with Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition (WISC-V), we find the rate of gain to be nearly identical to Flynn’s prediction when comparing only WISC-IV scores over the same time period. The FE is shown to vary significantly across the domains of cognitive ability, and thus changes to the construct coverage of the WISC-V Full Scale IQ (FSIQ) composite between editions significantly affect FE findings. Implications for future FE research are discussed.
References
Section:
|
Beaujean, A., Sheng, Y. (2014). Assessing the Flynn effect in the Wechsler scales. Journal of Individual Differences, 35, 63-78. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Byrne, B. M., van de Vijver, F. J. R. (2010). Testing for measurement and structural equivalence in large-scale cross-cultural studies: Addressing the issue of nonequivalence. International Journal of Testing, 10, 107-132. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Flynn, J. R. (1984). The mean IQ of Americans: Massive gains 1932 to 1978. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 29-51. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Flynn, J. R. (1987). Massive IQ gains in 14 nations: What IQ tests really measure. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 171-191. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Flynn, J. R. (2006). Tethering the elephant: Capital cases, IQ and the Flynn effect. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 12, 170-189. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Flynn, J. R. (2009). What is intelligence? (Expanded ed.). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Flynn, J. R. (2010). Problems with IQ gains: The huge vocabulary gap. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 412-433. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Flynn, J. R., Weiss, L. G. (2007). American IQ gains from 1932 to 2002: The WISC subtests and educational progress. International Journal of Testing, 7, 209-224. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gregoire, J., Daniel, M., Llorente, A. M., Weiss, L. G. (2016). The Flynn effect and its implications. In Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Holdnack, J. A., Prifitera, A. (Eds.), The WISC-V assessment and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 187-212). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kaufman, A. S. (2010). “In what ways are apples and oranges alike?” A critique of Flynn’s interpretation of the Flynn effect. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 382-393. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Kaufman, A. S., Raiford, S. E., Coalson, D. L. (2016). Intelligent testing with the WISC-V. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. Google Scholar | |
|
Kolen, M. J., Brennan, R. (2004). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Springer. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
McGrew, K. (2010). The Flynn effect and its critics: Rusty linchpins and “lookin’ for g and Gf in some of the wrong places.” Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 448-468. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Pietschnig, J., Voracek, M. (2013). One century of global IQ gains: A formal meta-analysis of the Flynn effect (1909-2010). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 282-306. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Watkins, M. W., Smith, L. G. (2013). Long-term stability of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition. Psychological Assessment, 25, 477-483. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Wechsler, D. (2003). Technical manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (4th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Wechsler, D. (2014). Technical manual for the Wechsler Intelligence Scales for Children (5th ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson. Google Scholar | |
|
Weiss, L. G. (2007). WAIS-III technical report: Response to Flynn. Retrieved from http://images.pearsonclinical.com/images/Products/WAIS-III/WAIS-III_TR_lr.pdf Google Scholar | |
|
Weiss, L. G. (2010). Considerations of the Flynn effect. Journal of Psycholoeducational Assessment, 28, 482-493. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Weiss, L. G., Keith, T. Z., Zhu, J., Chen, H. (2013). WISC-IV clinical validation of the four- and five-factor interpretive approaches. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 94-113. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Holdnack, J. A., Prifitera, A. (2016). WISC-V: Advances in the assessment of intelligence. In Weiss, L. G., Saklofske, D. H., Holdnack, J. A., Prifitera, A. (Eds.), The WISC-V assessment and interpretation: Scientist-practitioner perspectives (pp. 3-24). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Zhou, X., Zhu, J., Weiss, L. G. (2010). Peeking inside the “black box” of the Flynn effect: Evidence from three Wechsler instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 28, 399-411. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Zhu, J., Tulsky, D. (1999). Can IQ gain be accurately quantified by a simple difference formula? Perceptual & Motor Skill, 88, 1255-1260. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI |
