As recommended by Carroll, the present study examined the factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth Edition Spanish (WISC-IV Spanish) normative sample using higher order exploratory factor analytic techniques not included in the WISC-IV Spanish Technical Manual. Results indicated that the WISC-IV Spanish subtests were properly aligned with theoretically proposed factors; however, application of the Schmid and Leiman procedure found that the g factor accounted for large portions of total and common variance, whereas the four first-order factors accounted for small portions of total and common variance. Implications for clinical interpretation of the measurement instrument are discussed.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education . (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Google Scholar
Brunner, M., Nagy, G., Wilhelm, O. (2012). A tutorial on hierarchically structured constructs. Journal of Personality, 80, 796-846. doi:10.1111/j.1467–6494.2011.00749.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Canivez, G. L. (2011). Hierarchical factor structure of the Cognitive Assessment System: Variance partitions from the Schmid–Leiman (1957) procedure. School Psychology Quarterly, 26, 305-317. doi:10.1037/a0025973
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Canivez, G. L. (2014). Construct validity of the WISC-IV with a referred sample: Direct versus indirect hierarchical structures. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 38-51. doi:10.1037/spq0000032
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Canivez, G. L., Watkins, M. W., Dombrowski, S. C. (2015). Factor structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fifth Edition: Exploratory factor analyses with the 16 primary and secondary subtests. Psychological Assessment. Advance online publication. doi:10.1037/pas0000238
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Carretta, T. R., Ree, M. J. (2001). Pitfalls of ability research. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 9, 325-335. doi:10.1111/1468-2389.00184
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Carroll, J. B. (1995). On methodology in the study of cognitive abilities. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 429-452. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr3003_6
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Flanagan, D. P., Kaufman, A. S. (2009). Essentials of WISC-IV assessment (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Google Scholar
Frazier, T. W., Youngstrom, E. A. (2007). Historical increase in the number of factors measured by commercial tests of cognitive ability: Are we overfactoring? Intelligence, 35, 169-182. doi:10.1016/j.intell.2006.07.002
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Glutting, J. J., Watkins, M. W., Konold, T. R., McDermott, P. A. (2006). Distinctions without a difference: The utility of observed versus latent factors from the WISC-IV in estimating reading and math achievement on the WIAT-II. Journal of Special Education, 40, 103-114. doi:10.1177/00224669060400020101
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Gorsuch, R. L. (2003). Factor analysis. In Schinka, J. A., Velicer, F. F. (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Vol. 2: Research methods in psychology (pp. 143-164). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Harris, J. G., Muñoz, M. R., Llorente, A. M. (2008). Considerations in using the WISC-IV with Hispanic children. In Prifiteria, A., Saklofske, D. H., Weiss, L. G. (Eds.), WISC-IV clinical assessment and intervention (2nd ed., pp. 409-442). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Horn, J. L. (1965). A rationale and test for the number of factors in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 30, 179-185. doi:10.1007/BF02289447
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Keith, T. Z., Fine, J. G., Taub, G. E., Reynolds, M. R., Kranzler, J. H. (2006). Higher order, multisample, confirmatory factor analysis of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition: What does it measure? School Psychology Review, 35, 108-127. Available from http://www.nasponline.org
Google Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Preacher, K. J., Hong, S. (2001). Sample size in factor analysis: The role of model error. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 36, 611-637. doi:10.1207/S15327906MBR3604_06
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
O’Connor, B. P. (2000). SPSS and SAS programs for determining the number of components using parallel analysis and Velicer’s MAP test. Behavioral Research Methods, 32, 396-402. doi:10.3758/BF03200807
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Preacher, K. J., MacCallum, R. C. (2003). Repairing Tom Swift’s electric factor analysis machine. Understanding Statistics, 2, 13-43. doi:10.1207/S15328031US0201_02
Google Scholar | Crossref
Reise, S. P. (2012). The rediscovery of bifactor measurement models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 667-696. doi:10.1080/00273171.2012.715555
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Reise, S. P., Bonifay, W. E., Haviland, M. G. (2013). Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 129-140. doi:10.1080/00223891.2012.725437
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
San Miguel Montes, L. E., Allen, D. N., Puente, A. E., Neblina, C. (2010). Validity of the WISC-IV Spanish for a clinically referred sample of Hispanic children. Psychological Assessment, 22, 465-469. doi:10.1037/a0018895
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Schmid, J., Leiman, J. M. (1957). The development of hierarchical factor solutions. Psychometrika, 22, 53-61. doi:10.1007/BF02289209
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sotelo-Dynega, M., Dixon, S. G. (2014). Cognitive assessment practices: A survey of school psychologists. Psychology in the Schools, 51, 1031-1045. doi:10.1002/pits.21800
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Velicer, W. F. (1976). Determining the number of components from the matrix of partial correlations. Psychometrika, 31, 321-327. doi:10.1007/BF02293557
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Watkins, M. W. (2000). Monte Carlo PCA for parallel analysis [Computer software]. State College, PA: Ed & Psych Associates.
Google Scholar
Watkins, M. W. (2006). Orthogonal higher order structure of the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition. Psychological Assessment, 18, 123-125. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.18.1.123
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Watkins, M. W. (2013). Omega. [Computer software]. Phoenix, AZ: Ed & Psych Associates.
Google Scholar
Watkins, M. W., Beaujean, A. A. (2014). Bifactor structure of the Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence–Fourth edition. School Psychology Quarterly, 29, 52-63. doi:10.1037/spq0000038
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Wechsler, D. (2003a). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2003b). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition: Technical and interpretive manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2005a). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition, Spanish. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (2005b). Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children–Fourth edition, Spanish manual. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.
Google Scholar
Weiss, L. G., Keith, T. Z., Zhu, J., Chen, H. (2013). WISC-IV and clinical validation of the four-and five-factor interpretive approaches. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 31, 114-131. doi:10.1177/0734282913478032
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Zinbarg, R. E., Revelle, W., Yovel, I., Li, W. (2005). Cronbach’s α, Revelle’s β, and McDonald’s ωΗ: Their relations with each other and two alternative conceptualizations of reliability. Psychometrika, 70, 123-133. doi:10.1007/s11336–003–0974–7
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Zinbarg, R. E., Yovel, I., Revelle, W., McDonald, R. P. (2006). Estimating generalizability to a latent variable common to all of a scale’s indicators: A comparison of estimators for ωh. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30, 121-144. doi:10.1177/0146621605278814
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JPA-article-ppv for $36.00