Abstract
This study sought to validate the Short Grit Scale (Grit-S), an instrument that measures perseverance and passion for long-term goals, among Chinese high school students. Confirmatory factor analyses revealed that the scale retains the two-factor structure of the original scale. The scale demonstrated satisfactory internal consistency and test–retest reliability. Evidence for construct validity was found in relation to the Big Five personality traits, self-control, and IQ. Evidence for criterion validity was found via the observation that grit explained unique variance in academic performance. Together, the Grit-S is a sound measure of grit among Chinese adolescents.
Keywords grit, reliability, validity, Chinese adolescents
|
Costa, P. T., McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources. Google Scholar | |
|
Crowne, D. P., Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349-354. doi:10.1037/h0047358 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | |
|
Duckworth, A. L., Peterson, C., Matthews, M. D., Kelly, D. R. (2007). Grit: Perseverance and passion for long-term goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 1087-1101. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.92.6.1087 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D. (2009). Development and validation of the Short Grit Scale (GRIT–S). Journal of Personality Assessment, 91, 166-174. doi:10.1080/00223890802634290 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Eskreis-Winkler, L., Gross, J. J., Duckworth, A. L. (2016). Grit: Sustained self-regulation in the service of superordinate goals. In Vohs, K. D., Baumeister, R. F. (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (pp. 380-395). New York, NY: Guilford Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Raven, J. (2000). The Raven’s progressive matrices: Change and stability over culture and time. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 1-48. doi:10.1006/cogp.1999.0735 Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Shek, D. T., Chan, L. K. (1999). Hong Kong Chinese parents’ perceptions of the ideal child. The Journal of Psychology, 133, 291-302. doi:10.1080/00223989909599742 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Silvia, P. J., Sanders, C. E. (2010). Why are smart people curious? Fluid intelligence, openness to experience, and interest. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 242-245. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.01.006 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Tangney, J. P., Baumeister, R. F., Boone, A. L. (2004). High self-control predicts good adjustment, less pathology, better grades, and interpersonal success. Journal of Personality, 72, 271-324. doi:10.1111/j.0022-3506.2004.00263.x Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI | |
|
Wang, X., Wang, X., Ma, H. (1999). Rating scales for mental health (in Chinese). Beijing: Chinese Mental Health Periodical Agency. Google Scholar | |
|
Yang, J., McCrae, R. R., Costa, P. T., Dai, X., Yao, S., Cai, T., Gao, B. (1999). Cross-cultural personality assessment in psychiatric populations: The NEO-PI-R in the People’s Republic of China. Psychological Assessment, 11, 359-368. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.11.3.359 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Zhang, L. (2003). Does the big five predict learning approaches? Personality and Individual Differences, 34, 1431-1446. doi:10.1016/S0191-8869(02)00125-3 Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI |

