The 3 × 2 achievement goal framework comprising task-approach, task-avoidance, self-approach, self-avoidance, other-approach, and other-avoidance goals is the most recent conceptual development in goal orientation research. The purpose of this study was to extend the current literature by investigating the validity of the 3 × 2 Achievement Goal Questionnaire in a non-Western educational setting. Based on a sample of 384 first-year undergraduate students from a university in Hong Kong, confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated that the six-factor model of achievement goals provided better fit to the data than 10 alternative model structures tested. The six goal subscales have high internal consistency reliability, and gender invariance of the instrument was established via multigroup analysis. Results from multiple regression analyses also revealed that the six achievement goals were differentially predictive of students’ academic performance, deep and surface learning strategies, and instrumental help-seeking.

Akaike, H. (1974). A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19, 716-723. doi:10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Ames, C. (1984). Competitive, cooperative, and individualistic goal structures: A motivational analysis. In Ames, R., Ames, C. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education (Vol. 1, pp. 177-207). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16, 76-94. doi:10.1177/009207038801600107
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Bentler, P. M., Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significant tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: John Wiley.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Bouffard, T., Vezeau, C., Bordeleau, L. (1998). A developmental study of the relation between combined learning and performance goals and students’ self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 309-319. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.1998.tb01293.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Brown, M., Cudeck, R. (1992). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sociological Methods and Research, 21, 230-258. doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Chen, F. F. (2007). Sensitivity of goodness of fit indices to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 464-504. doi:10.1080/10705510701301834
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Diseth, A. (2015). The advantages of task-based and other-based achievement goals as standards of competence. International Journal of Educational Research, 72, 59-69. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2015.04.011
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040-1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34, 169-189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A. (1999). Test anxiety and the hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 628-644. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.628
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2 × 2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 501-519. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.3.501
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Elliot, A. J., McGregor, H. A., Gable, S. (1999). Achievement goals, study strategies, and exam performance: A mediational analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 549-563. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.91.3.549
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3 × 2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632-648. doi:10.1037/a0023952
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Elliot, A. J., Thrash, T. M. (2002). Approach-avoidance motivation in personality: Approach and avoidance temperaments and goals. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 82, 804-818. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.5.804
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Entwistle, N., McCune, V., Hounsell, J. (2002). Occasional report 1: Approaches to studying and perceptions of university teaching-learning environments: Concepts, measures and preliminary findings. Edinburgh, UK: ETL Project, Higher and Community Education, The School of Education, University of Edinburgh. Available from http://www.ed.ac.uk/etl
Google Scholar
Graham, J. M. (2006). Congeneric and (essentially) tau-equivalent estimates of score reliability: What they are and how to use them. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66, 930-944. doi:10.1177/0013164406288165
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Carter, S. M., Elliot, A. J. (2000). Short-term and long-term consequences of achievement goals: Predicting interest and performance over time. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 316-330. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.2.316
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Harackiewicz, J. M., Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). Multiple achievement goals and multiple pathways for learning: The agenda and impact of Paul R. Pintrich. Educational Psychologist, 40, 75-84. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep4002_2
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422-449. doi:10.1037/a0018947
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569-581. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.569
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Lee, K., Ning, F., Goh, H. C. (2014). Interaction between cognitive and non-cognitive factors: The influences of academic goal orientation and working memory on mathematical performance. Educational Psychology, 34, 73-91. doi:10.1080/01443410.2013.836158
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Tyson, D. F., Patall, E. A. (2008). When are achievement goal orientations beneficial for academic achievement? A closer look at main effects and moderating factors. International Review of Social Psychology, 21, 19-70.
Google Scholar | ISI
Maehr, M. L. (1984). Meaning and motivation. In Ames, R., Ames, C. (Eds.), Research on motivation in education: Student motivation (Vol. 1, pp. 115-144). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Maehr, M. L., Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In Warren, N. (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 221-267). New York, NY: Academic Press.
Google Scholar
Maehr, M. L., Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In Wentzel, K. R., Wigfield, A. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77-104). New York, NY: Routledge.
Google Scholar
Meece, J. L., Blumenfeld, P. C., Hoyle, R. H. (1988). Students’ goal orientations and cognitive engagement in classroom activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 514-523. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.514
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Meece, J. L., Holt, K. (1993). A pattern analysis of students’ achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 85, 582-590. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.85.4.582
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Middleton, M. J., Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 710-718. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.4.710
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Muthén, B. O., Kaplan, D. (1985). A comparison of some methodologies for the factor analysis of non-normal Likert variables. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 38, 171-189. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8317.1992.tb00975.x
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Muthén, L. K., Muthén, B. O. (2014). Mplus user’s guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
Google Scholar
Ning, H. K., Downing, K. (2010). Stability of the Learning and Study Strategies Inventory: A longitudinal analysis of Hong Kong and Mainland Chinese students. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 19, 525-537.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Pekrun, R., Elliot, A. J., Maier, M. A. (2006). Achievement goals and discrete achievement emotions: A theoretical model and prospective test. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 583-597. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.583
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Phan, H. P. (2009). Exploring students’ reflective thinking practice, deep processing strategies, effort, and achievement goal orientations. Educational Psychology: An International Journal of Experimental Educational Psychology, 29, 297-313. doi:10.1080/01443410902877988
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Roussel, P., Elliot, A. J., Feltman, R. (2011). The influence of achievement goals and social goals on help-seeking from peers in an academic context. Learning and Instruction, 21, 394-402. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.05.003
Google Scholar | Crossref
Sclove, S. L. (1987). Application of model-selection criteria to some problems in multivariate analysis. Psychometrika, 52, 333-343. doi:10.1007/BF02294360
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Wolters, C. A., Pintrich, P. R., Karabenick, S. A. (2005). Assessing academic self-regulated learning. In Moore, K. A., Lippman, L. H. (Eds.), What do children need to flourish? Conceptualizing and measuring indicators of positive development (pp. 251-270). New York, NY: Springer.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wolters, C. A., Yu, S. L., Pintrich, P. R. (1996). The relation between goal orientation and students’ motivational beliefs and self-regulated learning. Learning and Individual Differences, 8, 211-238. doi:10.1016/S1041-6080(96)90015-1
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JPA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0