The implementation of data-driven decision-making practices (DDDM) is a key component of contemporary teachers’ professional practice. As such, the measurement of DDDM and related constructs is important for multiple purposes in both research and practice (e.g., identifying teacher needs around DDDM, and monitoring teacher change in response to DDDM interventions). With the present study, we examined the score factor structure and reliability of the Data-Driven Decision-Making Efficacy and Anxiety Inventory (3D-MEA), an existing measure of data-driven decision-making–related self-efficacy and anxiety. Prior work with this instrument has provided some internal structure and reliability evidence in the context of teachers from the Pacific Northwest. Confirmatory factor analysis of 3D-MEA scores from a sample of Midwestern teachers replicates the initially hypothesized five-factor internal score structure. Our study also affords evidence of high score reliability within this population. Limitations, implications, and future directions are discussed.

American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education . (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
Google Scholar
Aydin, Y. C., Uzuntiryaki, E., Demirdogen, B. (2011). Interplay of motivational and cognitive strategies in predicting self-efficacy and anxiety. Educational Psychology, 31, 55-66.
Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Bandura, A. (1988). Self-efficacy conception of anxiety. Anxiety Research, 1, 77-98.
Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
Google Scholar
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238-246.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Bentler, P. M., Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 588-606.
Google Scholar | ISI
Bentler, P. M., Wu, E. J. C. (1993). EQS/Windows user’s guide: Version 4. Los Angeles, CA: BMDP Statistical Software.
Google Scholar
Browne, M. W., Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In Bollen, K. A., Long, J. S. (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T., Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56, 81-105.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Carlson, D., Borman, G., Robinson, M. (2011). A multistate district-level cluster randomized trial of the impact of data-driven reform on reading and mathematics achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33, 378-398.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Coburn, C. E., Turner, E. O. (2011). Research on data use: A framework and analysis. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research & Perspectives, 9, 173-206.
Google Scholar
Datnow, A., Hubbard, L. (2015). Teacher capacity for and beliefs about data-driven decision making: A literature review of international research. Journal of Educational Change, 17, 1-22.
Google Scholar
DeLuca, C., Bellara, A. (2013). The current state of assessment education: Aligning policy, standards, and teacher education curriculum. Journal of Teacher Education, 64, 356-372.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Duckworth, A. L., Yeager, D. S. (2015). Measurement matters assessing personal qualities other than cognitive ability for educational purposes. Educational Researcher, 44, 237-251.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Garrison, M. (2013). Concerns, knowledge, and efficacy: An application of the teacher change model to data driven decision-making professional development. Creative Education, 4, 673-682.
Google Scholar
Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W.-J., Garrison, M. (2013a). Becoming data driven: The influence of teachers’ sense of efficacy on concerns related to data-driven decision making. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 222-241.
Google Scholar | ISI
Dunn, K. E., Airola, D. T., Lo, W.-J., Garrison, M. (2013b). What teachers think about what they can do with data: Development and validation of the data driven decision-making efficacy and anxiety inventory. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 87-98.
Google Scholar | ISI
Fan, X., Thompson, B., Wang, L. (1999). Effects of sample size, estimation methods, and model specification on structural equation modeling fit indexes. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 56-83.
Google Scholar | ISI
Fornell, C., Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 39-50.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C. (1995). Multivariate data analysis with readings (4th ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis with readings (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Google Scholar
Hamilton, L., Halverson, R., Jackson, S., Mandinach, E., Supovitz, J., Wayman, J. (2009). Using student achievement data to support instructional decision making (NCEE 2009-4067). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Hooper, D., Coughlan, J., Mullen, M. R. (2008). Structural equation modelling: Guidelines for determining model fit. The Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6, 53-60.
Google Scholar
Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453.
Google Scholar | ISI
Hu, L., Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criterion for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55.
Google Scholar | ISI
Jimerson, J. B., Choate, M. R., Dietz, L. K. (2015). Supporting data-informed practice among early career teachers: The role of mentors. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 14, 204-232.
Google Scholar
Jöreskog, K. G., Sörbom, D. (1981). LISREL V: Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Chicago, IL: National Educational Resources.
Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
Google Scholar
Little, R. J. (1988). A test of missing completely at random for multivariate data with missing values. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 83, 1098-1202.
Google Scholar
MacCallum, R. C., Widaman, K. F., Zhang, S., Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84-99.
Google Scholar | ISI
Mandinach, E. B., Gummer, E. S. (2013). A systematic view of implementing data literacy in educator preparation. Educational Researcher, 42, 30-37.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Mandinach, E. B., Gummer, E. S. (2016). Data literacy for educators: Making it count in teacher preparation and practice. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
Google Scholar
Mardia, K. V. (1970). Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications. Biometrika, 57, 519-530.
Google Scholar | ISI
Marsh, J. A. (2012). Interventions promoting educators’ use of data: Research insights and gaps. Teachers College Record, 114, 1-48.
Google Scholar | ISI
Marsh, J. A., Pane, J. F., Hamilton, L. (2006). Making sense of data-driven decision making in education. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
Google Scholar
McIntosh, C. (2006). Rethinking fit assessment in structural equation modelling: A commentary and elaboration on Barrett (2007). Personality and Individual Differences, 42, 859-867.
Google Scholar
Means, B., Padilla, C., DeBarger, A., Bakia, M. (2009). Implementing data-informed decision making in schools: Teacher access, supports and use. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Google Scholar
Olsson, U. H., Foss, T., Troye, S. V., Howell, R. D. (2000). The performance of ML, GLS, and WLS estimation in structural equation modeling under conditions of misspecification and nonnormality. Structural Equation Modeling, 7, 557-595.
Google Scholar | ISI
Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Academic procrastination and statistics anxiety. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29, 3-19.
Google Scholar
Piro, J. S., Dunlap, K., Shutt, T. (2014). A collaborative data chat: Teaching summative assessment data use in pre-service teacher education. Cogent Education, 1(1).
Google Scholar
Reeves, T. D. (2016). Pre-service teachers’ data use opportunities during student teaching. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.01.003.
Google Scholar
Reeves, T. D., Chiang, J. L. (2016). Standardizing pre-service teacher preparation for instructional data-driven decision making. Unpublished manuscript.
Google Scholar
Reeves, T. D., Honig, S. L. (2015). A classroom assessment data literacy intervention for pre-service teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 50, 90-101.
Google Scholar
Reeves, T. D., Summers, K. H., Grove, E. (2016). Examining the landscape of teacher learning for data use: The case of Illinois. Cogent Education, 3(1).
Google Scholar
Schafer, J. L. (1999). Multiple imputation: A primer. Statistical Methods in Medical Research, 8, 3-15.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Schumacker, R. E., Lomax, R. G. (1996). A beginner’s guide to structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Google Scholar
Steiger, J. H., Lind, J. C. (1980, June) Statistically-based tests for the number of common factors. Paper presented at the Annual Spring Meeting of the Psychometric Society, Iowa City, IA.
Google Scholar
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W. (2001). Teacher efficacy: Capturing an elusive construct. Teaching and Teacher Education, 17, 783-805.
Google Scholar | ISI
Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A. W., Hoy, W. K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202-248.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Tucker, L. R., Lewis, C. (1973). The reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38, 1-10.
Google Scholar | ISI
U.S. Department of Education . (2008). Teachers’ use of student data systems to improve instruction: 2005 to 2007. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Education . (2010). Teachers’ ability to use data to inform instruction: Challenges and supports. Washington, DC: Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development, U.S. Department of Education.
Google Scholar
van Geel, M., Keuning, T., Visscher, A. J., Fox, J. P. (2016). Assessing the effects of a school-wide data-based decision-making intervention on student achievement growth in primary schools. American Educational Research Journal, 53, 360-394.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Volante, L., Fazio, X. (2007). Exploring teacher candidates’ assessment literacy: Implications for teacher education reform and professional development. Canadian Journal of Education, 30, 749-770.
Google Scholar
Wayman, J. C. (2005). Involving teachers in data-driven decision-making: Using computer data systems to support teacher inquiry and reflection. Journal of Education for Students Placed At Risk, 10, 295-308.
Google Scholar
Williams, A. S. (2010). Statistics anxiety and instructor immediacy. Journal of Statistics Education, 18, 1-18.
Google Scholar
View access options

My Account

Welcome
You do not have access to this content.



Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

Click the button below for the full-text content

请点击以下获取该全文

Institutional Access

does not have access to this content.

Purchase Content

24 hours online access to download content

Your Access Options


Purchase

JPA-article-ppv for $36.00

Article available in:

Related Articles

Citing articles: 0