Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 17, 2024

The Matrix of AI Agency: On the Demarcation Problem in Social Theory

Abstract

Recent developments in artificial intelligence (AI) make the question of machine agency a pressing matter. Contrary to the idea that agency is the inherent quality of a system, we argue that agency should be seen as a social status, or more precisely, a socially granted license to issue actions that is acquired and monitored in social practices. From this perspective, we develop criteria for the theoretical demarcation of agents and nonagents to distinguish entities based on their attributed abilities and their relative power in social networks. We derive a matrix of different types of agents and show how this matrix can inform empirical studies on AI.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Abbott Andrew Delano. 1988. The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Abend Gabriel. 2018. “The Limits of Decision and Choice.” Theory and Society 47(6):805–41.
Anicker Fabian. 2023. “Sozialisierte Maschinen: Zur gesellschaftlichen Funktion von künstlicher Intelligenz.” Zeitschrift für Theoretische Soziologie 11(1):79–105.
Anicker Fabian, Flaßhoff Golo. 2024. “Common-Sense Attributions of AI Agency. Evidence from an Experiment with ChatGPT.” Pp. 179–94 in AI and Common Sense: Ambitions and Frictions, edited by M. Bauer, Schiele B. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
Attewell Paul. 1974. “Ethnomethodology Since Garfinkel.” Theory and Society 1(2):179–210.
Austin John L. 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
Barad Karen. 2003. “Posthumanist Performativity: Toward an Understanding of How Matter Comes to Matter.” Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society 28(3):801–31.
Barnes Barry. 2000. Understanding Agency. Social Theory and Responsible Action. London: Sage.
Blumer Herbert. 1966. “Sociological Implications of the Thought of George Herbert Mead.” American Journal of Sociology 71(5):535–44.
Bourdieu Pierre. 1996. The Rules of Art: Genesis and Structure of the Literary Field. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Bourdieu Pierre. 1999. “The Specificity of the Scientific Field and the Social Conditions of the Progress of Reason.” Pp. 31–50 in The Science Studies Reader, edited by M. Baglioli. London: Routledge.
Brandom Robert B. 2001. Making It Explicit. Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. 4th ed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Bubeck Sébastien, Chandrasekaran Varun, Eldan Ronen, Gehrke Johannes, Horvitz Eric, Kamar Ece, Lee Peter, et al. 2023. “Sparks of Artificial General Intelligence: Early Experiments with GPT-4.” arXiv. http://arxiv.org/pdf/2303.12712.
Bucher Taina. 2018. If . . . Then: Algorithmic Power and Politics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Butler Judith. 2009. “Performativity, Precarity and Sexual Politics.” Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 4(3):1–13.
Callon Michel. 1984. “Some Elements of a Sociology of Translation: Domestication of the Scallops and the Fishermen of St Brieuc Bay.” The Sociological Review 32(1):196–233.
Campbell Colin. 2009. “Distinguishing the Power of Agency from Agentic Power: A Note on Weber and the ‘Black Box’ of Personal Agency.” Sociological Theory 27(4):407–18.
Cardon Dominique, Cointet Jean-Philippe, Mazières Antoine. 2018. “Neurons Spike Back. The Invention of Inductive Machines and the Artificial Intelligence Controversy.” Réseaux 5(211):173–220.
Choudhury Avishek, Hamid Shamszare. 2024. “The Impact of Performance Expectancy, Workload, Risk, and Satisfaction on Trust in ChatGPT: Cross-Sectional Survey Analysis.” JMIR Human Factors 11.
Coleman James Samuel. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. Cambridge, UK: Belknap Press.
Collins Harry, Evans Robert, Gorman Mike. 2007. “Trading Zones and Interactional Expertise.” Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 38(4):657–66.
Collins Harry, Weinel Martin, Evans Robert. 2010. “The Politics and Policy of the Third Wave: New Technologies and Society.” Critical Policy Studies 4(2):185–201.
Committee on Legal Affairs. 2017. “Report with Recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics: Procedure: 2015/2103(INL).” https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/A-8-2017-0005_EN.html?redirect#_section1.
Davidson Donald. 1973. “Radical Interpretation.” Dialectica 27(3):313–28.
de Cosmo Leonardo. 2022. “Google Engineer Claims AI Chatbot Is Sentient: Why That Matters.” The Scientific American, June 12. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/google-engineer-claims-ai-chatbot-is-sentient-why-that-matters/.
Dennett Daniel. 1971. “Intentional Systems.” The Journal of Philosophy 68(4):87–106.
Dennett Daniel. 1989. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Dennett Daniel. 2009. “Intentional Systems Theory.” Pp. 339–50 in The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Mind, edited by A. Beckermann, McLaughlin B. P., Walter S. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Devraj Adithya M., Bušić Ana, Meyn Sean. 2021. “Fundamental Design Principles for Reinforcement Learning Algorithms.” Pp. 75–137 in Handbook of Reinforcement Learning and Control, edited by K. G. Vamvoudakis, Wan Y., Lewis F. L., Cansever D. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Dorrestijn Steven. 2012. “Technical Mediation and Subjectivation: Tracing and Extending Foucault’s Philosophy of Technology.” Philosophy & Technology 25(2):221–41. don:10.1007/s13347-011-0057-0.
Dreyfus Hubert L. 1992. What Computers Still Can’t Do: A Critique of Artificial Reason. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Epley Nicholas, Waytz Adam, Cacioppo John T. 2007. “On Seeing Human: A Three-Factor Theory of Anthropomorphism.” Psychological Review 114(4):864–86.
Ericsson Iréne, Hellström Ingrid, Kjellström Sofia. 2011. “Sliding Interactions: An Ethnography about How Persons with Dementia Interact in Housing with Care for the Elderly.” Dementia 10(4):523–38.
Foucault Michel. [1965] 1988. Madness and Civilization: A History of Insanity in the Age of Reason. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
Foucault Michel. 2013. La société punitive: Cours au Collège de France (1972-1973). Edited by F. Ewald, A. Fontana, and B. E. Harcourt. Paris: Ehess Gallimard Seuil.
Fourcade Marion, Burrell Jenna. 2021. “The Society of Algorithms.” Annual Review of Sociology 47:213–37.
Fourcade Marion, Healy Kieran. 2013. “Classification Situations: Life-Chances in the Neoliberal Era.” Accounting, Organizations and Society 38(8):559–72.
Fourcade Marion, Johns Fleur. 2020. “Loops, Ladders and Links: The Recursivity of Social and Machine Learning.” Theory and Society 49:803–32.
Fuchs Stephan. 2001. “Beyond Agency.” Sociological Theory 19(1):24–40.
Fuller Steve. 2023. “Humanity’s In-Betweenness: Towards a Prehistory of Cyborg Life.” Pp. 63–80 in Humanity in-between and beyond, edited by M. Michałowska. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Gambino Andrew, Fox Jesse, Ratan Rabindra A. 2020. “Building a Stronger CASA: Extending the Computers Are Social Actors Paradigm.” Human-Machine Communication 1:71–85.
Gerlitz Caroline, Weltevrede Esther. 2020. “What Happens to ANT and Its Emphasis on the Sociomaterial Grounding of the Social, in Digital Sociology?” Pp. 345–56 in The Routledge Companion to Actor-Network Theory, edited by A. Blok. Milton, UK: Routledge.
Giddens Anthony. 1979. Central Problems in Social Theory. Oakland: University of California Press.
Gillespie Tarleton. 2014. “The Relevance of Algorithms.” Pp. 167–94 in Media Technologies, edited by T. Gillespie, Boczkowski P. J., Foot K. A. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Goffman Erving. 1961. Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other Inmates. New York, NY: Doubleday & Company.
Gunkel David J. 2012. The Machine Question: Critical Perspectives on AI, Robots, and Ethics. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Gutiérrez Jorge Luis M. 2023. “On Actor-Network Theory and Algorithms: ChatGPT and the New Power Relationships in the Age of AI. AI and Ethics. Advance online publication.
Habermas Jürgen. 1984. The Theory of Communicative Action. Vol. 1. Translated by McCarthy T. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
Henrickson Leah. 2023. “Chatting with the Dead: The Hermeneutics of Thanabots.” Media, Culture & Society 45(5):949–66.
Hong Joo-Wha, Curran Nathaniel Ming. 2019. “Artificial Intelligence, Artists, and Art.” ACM Transactions on Multimedia Computing Communications and Applications 15(2):1–16.
Latour Bruno. 1983. “Give Me a Laboratory and I Will Raise the World.” Pp. 141–70 in Science Observed: Perspectives on the Social Study of Science, edited by K. Knorr-Cetina, Mulkay M. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Latour Bruno. 1992. “Where Are the Missing Masses? The Sociology of a Few Mundane Artifacts.” Pp. 225–58 in Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, edited by W. E. Bijker, Law J. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Latour Bruno. 2000. “The Berlin Key or How to Do Words with Things.” Pp. 10–21 in Matter Materiality and Modern Culture, edited by P. Graves-Brown. London: Routledge.
Latour Bruno. 2005. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Latour Bruno, Woolgar Steve. 1979. Laboratory Life. The Construction of Scientific Fact. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Liang Weixin, Izzo Zachary, Zhang Yaohui, Lepp Haley, Cao Hancheng, Zhao Xuandong, Chen Lingjiao, et al. 2024. “Monitoring AI-Modified Content at Scale: A Case Study on the Impact of ChatGPT on AI Conference Peer Reviews.” arXiv.
Liu Zheng. 2021. “Sociological Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence: A Typological Reading.” Sociology Compass 15(3):e12851.
Lizardo Omar. 2010. “Beyond the Antinomies of Structure: Levi-Strauss, Giddens, Bourdieu, and Sewell.” Theory and Society 39(6):651–88.
Marchesi Serena, Ghiglino Davide, Ciardo Francesca, Perez-Osorio Jairo, Baykara Ebru, Wykowska Agnieszka. 2019. “Do We Adopt the Intentional Stance toward Humanoid Robots?” Frontiers in Psychology 10:450.
Mascheroni Giovanna. 2024. “A New Family Member or Just Another Digital Interface? Smart Speakers in the Lives of Families with Young Children.” Human-Machine Communication 7:45–63.
Mazzone Marian, Elgammal Ahmed. 2019. “Art, Creativity, and the Potential of Artificial Intelligence.” Arts 8(1):26.
Mead George Herbert. 1934. Mind, Self, and Society. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Meyer John. 1986. “Myths of Socialization and of Personality.” Pp. 208–21 in Reconstructing Individualism. Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought, edited by T. C. Heller, Sosna M., Wellbery D. E. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
Nass Clifford, Steuer Jonatha, Tauber Ellen R. 1994. “Computers Are Social Actors.” Pp. 72–78 in CHI ‘94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. New York, NY: Association for Computing Machinery.
Perez-Osorio Jairo, Wykowska Agnieszka. 2020. “Adopting the Intentional Stance toward Natural and Artificial Agents.” Philosophical Psychology 33(3):369–95.
Pickering Andrew. 2010. The Mangle of Practice: Time, Agency, and Science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Popper Karl R. 2002. Conjectures and Refutations. London: Routledge.
Rammert Werner. 2012. “Distributed Agency and Advanced Technology. Or: How to Analyze Constellations of Collective Inter-agency.” Pp. 89–112 in Agency without Actors? New Approaches to Collective Action, edited by J.-H. Passoth, Peuker B., Schillmeier M. London: Routledge.
Rammert Werner. 2021. “Technology and Innovation.” Pp. 515–34 in Soziologie: Sociology in the German-Speaking World: Special Issue Soziologische Revue 2020, edited by B. Hollstein, Greshoff R., Schimank U., Weiß A. Berlin, Germany: De Gruyter Oldenbourg.
Rapp Amon, Boldi Arianna, Curti Lorenzo, Perrucci Alessandro, Simeoni Rossana. 2024. “How Do People Ascribe Humanness to Chatbots? An Analysis of Real-World Human-Agent Interactions and a Theoretical Model of Humanness.” International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 40(19):6027–50.
Rich Elaine, Knight Kevin, Shivashankar Nair B. 2010. Artificial Intelligence. 3rd ed. New Delhi, India: Tata McGraw Hill.
Ricoeur Paul. 1975. “Philosophical Hermeneutics and Theological Hermeneutics.” Studies in Religion/Sciences Religieuses 5(1):14–33.
Rosenblat Alex, Levy Karen E. C., Barocas Solon, Hwang Tim. 2017. “Discriminating Tastes: Uber’s Customer Ratings as Vehicles for Workplace Discrimination.” Policy & Internet 9(3):256–79.
Sadler Matthew, Regan Natasha. 2019. Game Changer: AlphaZero’s Groundbreaking Chess Strategies and the Promise of AI. Alkmaar, Netherlands: New in Chess.
Samra-Fredericks Dalvir. 2010. “Ethnomethodology and the Moral Accountability of Interaction: Navigating the Conceptual Terrain of ‘Face’ and Face-Work.” Journal of Pragmatics 42(8):2147–57.
Sayes Edwin. 2014. “Actor-Network Theory and Methodology: Just What Does It Mean to Say That Nonhumans Have Agency?” Social Studies of Science 44(1):134–49.
Scannell Barry, Moore Leo, Hayes Rachel. 2023. “ECJ Says No in SCHUFA Case: New Decision on Automated Decision Making.” Lexology. https://www.lexology.com/library/detail.aspx?g=d702d2a8-8851-4e70-98ec-65e5288c4739%23.
Schellen Elef, Wykowska Agnieszka. 2018. “Intentional Mindset toward Robots—Open Questions and Methodological Challenges.” Frontiers in Robotics and AI 5:139.
Schütz Alfred. 1967. The Phenomenology of the Social World. Edited by G. Walsh, Lehnert F. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
Scott Marvin B., Lyman Stanford M. 1968. “Accounts.” American Sociological Review 33(1):46–62.
Searle John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Searle John R. 1989. “How Performatives Work.” Linguistics and Philosophy 12(5):535–58.
Sewell William H. 1992. “A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency, and Transformation.” American Journal of Sociology 98(1):1–29.
Shahsavar Yeganeh, Choudhury Avishek. 2023. “User Intentions to Use ChatGPT for Self-Diagnosis and Health-Related Purposes: Cross-Sectional Survey Study.” JMIR Human Factors 10(2023):e47564.
Shepard Alexandra. 2015. Accounting for Oneself: Worth, Status, and the Social Order in Early Modern England. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Skjuve Marita, Følstad Asbjørn, Fostervold Knut Inge, Brandtzaeg Petter Bae. 2022. “A Longitudinal Study of Human–Chatbot Relationships.” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 168:102903.
Stokel-Walker Chris. 2024. “AI Chatbots Have Thoroughly Infiltrated Scientific Publishing.” Scientific American. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/chatbots-have-thoroughly-infiltrated-scientific-publishing/.
Suchman Lucy. 2023. “The Uncontroversial ‘Thingness’ of AI.” Big Data & Society 10(2):1–5.
Turing Alan M. 1950. “Computing Machinery and Intelligence.” Mind 59(236):433–60.
von Foerster Heinz. 1970. “Thoughts and Notes on Cognition.” Pp. 25–48 in Cognition. A Multiple View, edited by P. L. Garvin. New York, NY: Spartan Books.
Webb Maria. 2023. “Magnus Carlsen: How Intuition and AI Shape the Best Chess Player in the World.” Techopedia, August 2. https://www.techopedia.com/magnus-carlsen-how-intuition-and-ai-shape-the-best-chess-player-in-the-world.
Weber Max. 2014. Collected Methodological Writings. Edited by H. H. Bruun, Whimster S. London: Routledge.
Weber Max. 2019. Economy and Society: A New Translation. Translated by Tribe K. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Xu Xu, Kostka Genia, Cao Xun. 2022. “Information Control and Public Support for Social Credit Systems in China.” Journal of Politics 84(4):2230–45.

Biographies

Fabian Anicker is a postdoc researcher in the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Duesseldorf, Germany. His research interests include the sociology of AI, theory building and theorizing, and political sociology. Since 2022, he has conducted empirical studies on the use of AI and attitudes toward AI with his coauthors and published on the theoretical foundations of the sociology of AI.
Florian Golo Flaßhoff is a PhD candidate in the Department of Social Science at the University of Duesseldorf. He pursued studies in media and communication science and global mass communication at the University of Leipzig. Presently, he is engaged in the project “Opinion Monitor Artificial Intelligence.” His research interests encompass opinion research, social psychology, and artificial intelligence.
Frank Marcinkowski is a full professor in the Department of Social Sciences at the University of Duesseldorf. His research interests include political communication, media sociology, and public opinion on science and technology. Within sociology, he has been recognized for his contributions to a systems theory of the media. He is currently working on cognitive and emotional responses to artificial intelligence.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 17, 2024
Issue published: December 2024

Keywords

  1. artificial intelligence
  2. AI
  3. agency
  4. attribution
  5. ANT
  6. action theory

Rights and permissions

© American Sociological Association 2024.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Fabian Anicker
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Golo Flaßhoff
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany
Frank Marcinkowski
Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Germany

Notes

Fabian Anicker, Institut für Sozialwissenschaften, Heinrich-Heine-Universität Düsseldorf, KMW I, Universitätsstraße 1, Düsseldorf, 40225, Germany. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Sociological Theory.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 745

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

ASA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

ASA members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text