Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online July 2, 2012

Modeling and Remodeling Writing

Abstract

In Section 1 of this article, the author discusses the succession of models of adult writing that he and his colleagues have proposed from 1980 to the present. He notes the most important changes that differentiate earlier and later models and discusses reasons for the changes. In Section 2, he describes his recent efforts to model young children’s expository writing. He proposes three models that constitute an elaboration of Bereiter and Scardamalia’s knowledge-telling model. In Section 3, he describes three running computer programs that simulate the action of the models described in Section 2.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Bereiter C., Scardamalia M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Berninger V., Cartwright A., Yates C., Swanson H. L., Abbott R. (1994). Developmental skills related to writing and reading acquisition in the intermediate grades: Shared and unique variance. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 6, 161-196.
Berninger V., Fuller F., Whitaker D. (1996). A process approach to writing development across the life span. Educational Psychology Review, 8, 193-218.
Berninger V. W., Swanson H. L. (1994). Modifying Hayes and Flower’s model of skilled writing to explain beginning and developing writing. In Butterfield E. C., Carlson J. (Eds.), Children’s writing: Toward a process theory of the development of skilled writing (pp. 57-81) London: JAI Press.
Berninger V. W., Yates C., Cartwright A., Rutberg J., Remy E., Abbott R. (1992). Lower-level developmental skills in beginning writing. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4, 257-280.
Bourdin B., Fayol M. (1994). Is written language production more difficult than oral language production: A working-memory approach. International Journal of Psychology, 29, 591-620.
Bridwell L. S. (1980). Revising strategies in twelfth grade students’ transactional writing. Research in the Teaching of English, 14, 197-222.
Chenoweth N., Hayes J. R. (2001). Fluency in writing. Generating text in L1 and L2. Written Communication, 18, 80-98.
Christensen C. A. (2004). Relationship between orthographic-motor integration and computer use for the production of creative and well-structured text. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 74, 551-564.
Connelly V., Gee D., Walsh E. (2007). A comparison of keyboarded and handwritten compositions and the relationship with transcription speed. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 77, 479- 492.
De La, Paz S., Graham S. (1995). Dictation: Applications to writing for students with learning disabilities. In Scruggs T., Mastropieri M. (Eds.), Advances in learning and behavioral disorders (Vol. 9, pp. 227-247). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press
Fuller D. F. (1995). Development of topic-comment algorithms and test structures in written compositions of students in grades one through nine. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.
Galbraith D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge constituting process. In Torrence M., Galbraith D. (Eds.), Studies in Writing: Vol. 4. Knowing what to write: Conceptual processes in text production (pp. 137-157). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Hayes J. R. (1996). A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing. In Levy C. M., Randall S. (Eds.), The science of writing: Theories, methods, individual differences, and applications (pp. 1-27). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hayes J. R. (2011). Kinds of knowledge-telling: Modeling early writing development. Journal of Writing Research, 3(2), 73-92.
Hayes J. R. (2012). My past and present as writing researcher and thoughts about the future of writing research. In Berninger V. W. (Ed.), Past, present, and future contributions of cognitive writing research to cognitive psychology (pp. 3-26). New York: Psychology Press
Hayes J. R., Chenoweth N. A. (2006). Is working memory involved in the transcribing and editing of texts? Written Communication, 23(2), 135-149.
Hayes J. R., Flower L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In Gregg L. W., Steinberg E. R. (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Hayes J. R., Flower L., Schriver K. A., Stratman J., Carey L. (1987). Cognitive processes in revision. In Rosenberg S. (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics: Vol. 2. Reading writing and language processing (pp. 176-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hayes J. R., Schriver K., Hill C., Hatch J. (1990). Seeing problems with text: How students’ engagement makes a difference. Pittsburgh, PA: Center for the Study of Writing.
Jones D. A., Christensen C. A. (1999). Relationship between automaticity in handwriting and students’ ability to generate written text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 1-6
Kaufer D. S., Hayes J. R., Flower L. S. (1986). Composing written sentences. Research in the Teaching of English, 20(2), 121-140.
McCutchen D., Perfetti C. A. (1982). Coherence and connectedness in the development of discourse production. Text, 2,113-139.
Newell A., Simon H. A. (1956). The logic theory machine. IRE Transactions on Information Theory, 2(3), 61-79.
Pennebaker J. W. (1997). Writing about emotional experiences as a therapeutic process. Psychological Science, 8, 162-166.
Pennebaker J. W., Kiecolt-Glaser J., Glaser R. (1988). Disclosure of traumas and immune function: Health implications for psychotherapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 56, 239-245.
Scardamalia M., Bereiter C. (1983). The development of evaluative, diagnostic, and remedial capabilities in children’s composing. In Martlew M. (Ed.), The psychology of written language: Developmental and educational perspectives (pp. 67-95). New York: Wiley.
Sommers N. (1980). Revision strategies of student writers and experienced adult writers. College Compositions and Communication, 31, 78-88.
Stallard C. (1974). An analysis of the writing behavior of good student writers. Research in the Teaching of English, 8, 206-218.
Wallace D. L., Hayes J. R. (1991). Redefining revision for freshmen. Research in the Teaching of English, 25, 54-66.

Biographies

John R. Hayes is emeritus professor of psychology at Carnegie Mellon in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (USA). Engaged in writing research since 1979, he has been concerned both with the creation of frameworks to describe the global organization of the cognitive and affective aspects of writing and with the analysis of specific writing issues. He and his colleagues have created models for sub-processes such as planning and revision, applied think-aloud protocols to clarify public texts, designed strategies for teaching revision to college freshmen, discovered how texts convey an impression of the writer’s personality to readers, tested the reliability of teacher’s evaluations of student texts, assessed technical writing instruction, evaluate the impact of linguistic experience in writing, and explored language bursts to identify bottlenecks in the writing process. Recently he has turned his attention to creating model of the writing processes of primary and secondary school writers—models that suggest a reinterpretation of Bereiter and Scardamalia’s knowledge-telling model.

Supplementary Material

Podcast

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: July 2, 2012
Issue published: July 2012

Keywords

  1. writing models
  2. writing development
  3. motivation
  4. adult writing
  5. children’s writing

Rights and permissions

© 2012 SAGE Publications.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

John R. Hayes
Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania

Notes

John R. Hayes, Carnegie Mellon University, Department of Psychology, Baker Hall 342c, Pittsburgh, PA 15213 Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Written Communication.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 11705

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 329 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 327

  1. The AI Ghostwriter Effect: When Users do not Perceive Ownership of AI-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Investigating students’ cognitive processes in generative AI-assisted ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. A measure of EFL argumentative writing cognitive load: Scale developme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. The employment of self-awareness in investigating public willingness t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Writing and Reading Connections: A before, during, and after Experienc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Educational attainment in Swedish (L1) and English (L2) for students w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Relationships of writing self-efficacy, perceived value of writing, an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The relation of bilingual cognitive skills to the second language writ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. Individualizing goal-setting interventions using automated writing eva...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. The more, the better? Learning with feedback and instruction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Extraction of transforming sequences and sentence histories from writi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Constructing theoretically informed measures of pause duration in expe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Measuring non-linearity of multi-session writing processes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. The effect of web-based peer feedback on students’ writing achievement
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. L2 learners’ challenges in integrated writing tasks: implications for ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. The relationship between executive functions and writing in children: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Teachers’ Implementation of the Writing Curriculum in Grades 7-8 of Ch...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Dr. Seuss, police reports, and lamb recipes: Examining text reformulat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Role of transcription skills in young Chinese language learners’ sente...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. Student Perceptions of ChatGPT Use in a College Essay Assignment: Impl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. A mixed Rasch model analysis of multiple profiles in L2 writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Impact of school SES on literacy development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Motivation and genre as social action: a phenomenological perspective ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. Reading ability and challenges in a project-based academic report writ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Are there differences between first-grade children’s display of metaco...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Towards scaffolding self-regulated writing: implications for developin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Which executive functions affect text comprehension and writing in pap...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. AI tools as affordances and contradictions for EFL writers: Emic persp...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. What to Assess for Mathematical Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Chinese first-year undergraduates’ strategy use in the English writing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. An analysis of the psychometric properties of the writing-specific cog...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. The relationship between green innovation and sustainable growth in Ko...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Recursivity in source-based writing: a process analysis
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Insights into Editing and Revising in Writing Process Using Keystroke ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Chapter 10. Exploring the generation, development, and integration of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Chapter 11. Affordances and limitations when using Inputlog to study y...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Der SMisK – ein Fragebogen zur Erfassung der Schreibmotivation im schu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Generativity and Subjective Wellbeing of Malaysian Old Adults: The Rol...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Understanding EFL students’ feedback literacy development in academic ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Profiling support in literacy development: Use of natural language pro...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Feedback literacy in writing research and teaching: Advancing L2 WCF r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Learning to use electronic outlining via observational learning: Effec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Contributions of attentional control, hyperactivity-impulsivity, and r...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. Google Translate for Writing in an Online English Class: Vietnamese Le...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Empowering Students to Cultivate Better Writers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  46. Assessing writing in fourth grade: Rhetorical specification effects on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Assessing self-regulated writing strategies, self-efficacy, task compl...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Dilemmes professionnels de l’enseignant en contexte de révision-réécri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. The development and validation of a scale for measuring EFL secondary ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. A longitudinal intervention study of the effects of increasing amount ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Development and validation of a genre-based second language (L2) writi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  52. Relating transcription, executive functions and text quality in Grades...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. The revision process during handwritten text production: The case of F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. When narratives speak louder than numbers: the effects of narrative pe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. Choice Over Control: How Users Write with Large Language Models using ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. The motivations that improve the creative writing process: what they m...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  57. Choosing how to plan informative synthesis texts: Effects of strategy-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Metacognitive monitoring skills of reading comprehension and writing b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. Interacting with Next-Phrase Suggestions: How Suggestion Systems Aid a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  60. Revisions in written composition: Introducing speech-to-text to childr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Consumer intention over upcoming utopia: Urban air mobility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Stories behind the scenes: L2 students’ cognitive processes of multimo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Assessing academic writing self‐efficacy belief and writing performanc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  64. An exploratory analysis of revision behavior development of L2 writers...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. Modeling Mobile Writing: Applying Sociocognitive Models of Writing to ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Sprachbewusstheit und Schreiben
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  67. Literacies, language, and schooling: exploring writing pedagogy for En...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. The Effect of Low-Level Writing Process on Written Narrative Textual C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. “Who Is Going to Read the Story That I Have Written?” The Role of the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  70. The Writer’s Affectivity When Writing to Learn
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  71. Finding the Right Words: Language Technologies to Support Formulation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  72. Writing and Thinking: What Changes with Digital Technologies?
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  73. More Motivating than Cherry Pie? The Writer(s) Within Community Model ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  74. Exploring L1-To-L2 Rhetorical Transfer and Relevant Metacognitive Skil...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  75. COPING STRATEGIES USED BY PRE-SERVICE TEACHERS TO OVERCOME WRITING CHA...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  76. The role of cognitive individual differences in digital versus pen-and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  77. Validation of crystal structure of 2‐acetamidophenyl acetate: an exper...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  78. Studying children's writing development with a corpus
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  79. The relationship of proficiency to speed fluency, pausing, and eye-gaz...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  80. Clustering students’ writing behaviors using keystroke logging: a lear...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  81. Effects of verbal tasks on driving simulator performance
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  82. Schreibcoaching im beruflichen Übergangssystem. Auf der Suche nach För...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  83. Investigating high schoolers’ L2 writing anxiety, L2 writing self-effi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  84. Facilitating L2 writers’ metacognitive strategy use in argumentative w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  85. Viabilidad de un centro de escritura digital universitario: perspectiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  86. Systematic Review of Scale Development Practices in the Field of Touri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  87. How to provide automated feedback on the writing process? A participat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  88. Handwriting and typing: Occupational therapy practice when supporting ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  89. Anticipatory Awareness and Actual Handwriting Performance Measures amo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  90. A review of the ESL/EFL learners’ gains from online peer feedback on E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  91. Investigating the writing performance of educationally at-risk examine...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  92. Effects of Individual and Group Metacognitive Prompts on Tertiary-Leve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  93. Learners’ perceived advantages and social-affective dispositions towar...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  94. Breathing our way into mindful academic writing: a collaborative autoe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  95. ‘Take me to a virtual trip if you want me to write better!’: the impac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  96. It's not just a phase: Investigating text simplification in a second l...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  97. Normen beim kooperativen Schreiben im naturwissenschaftlichen Unterric...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  98. Understanding learners’ metacognitive experiences in learning to write...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  99. Upper-Elementary Students’ Metacognitive Knowledge about Writing and I...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  100. Pen-and-Paper versus Computer-Mediated Writing Modality as a New Dimen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  101. Contribution of oral narrative textual competence and spelling skills ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  102. Chapter 4. L2 writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  103. Chapter 6. L2 writing and its external correlates
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  104. Self-regulation and early writing: A longitudinal examination from pre...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  105. The Evaluation of Preservice Turkish Teachers’ Rewriting Skills in the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  106. A Review on Antecedents and Consequences of Leisure Reading and Writin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  107. Is nature relatedness associated with better mental health? An explora...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  108. Writing Fluency and Digital Source Use in Authentic Academic Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  109. On the basis of source: Impacts of individual differences on multiple-...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  110. Students' Writing Engagement
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  111. Writing motivation in Chinese children with developmental dyslexia
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  112. What students with intellectual disabilities know about writing planni...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  113. Reflect, Reimagine, Revisit: A Framework for Centering Critical Writin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  114. THE INTERDEPENDENCE BETWEEN PERCEIVED SELF-EFFICACY AND SELF-ASSESSMEN...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  115. How do expert (creative) writers write? A literature review and a call...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  116. Do Written Language Bursts Mediate the Relations of Language, Cognitiv...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  117. Automated writing evaluation: Does spelling and grammar feedback suppo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  118. Facilitating Text Production in Fourth Graders: Effects of Script-Base...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  119. Effectiveness of automated writing evaluation systems in school settin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  120. The early automated writing evaluation (eAWE) framework
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  121. Struggling with historical significance: Reasoning, reading, and writi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  122. Accessible Communication of Corporate Social Responsibility: Developme...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  123. Exploring feedback and regulation in online writing classes with keyst...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  124. Handwriting fluency and the quality of primary grade students’ writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  125. Understanding text-based studies of linguistic development through goa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  126. The Writing Sub-scales of the China’s Standards of English Language Ab...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  127. Self-Regulated Learning Strategies in Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  128. Sociocognitive Theory, Sociocultural Theory and SRL
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  129. The Writing Cycle and Cognitive Processes that May Affect Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  130. Deliberate Practice of Handwriting: Supervision Under the Ghost of an ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  131. The Competence Model of Writing Skills in the project “Multilingual De...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  132. Literature Review
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  133. Results
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  134. Discussion
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  135. Association of keyboarding fluency and writing performance in online-d...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  136. Appropriateness as an aspect of lexical richness: What do quantitative...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  137. Writing about historical significance: The effects of a reading-to-wri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  138. Measuring Autistic Writing Skills: Combining Perspectives from Neurodi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  139. Continuing the dialogue between writing experts and academic librarian...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  140. Challenging the connection between task perceptions and language use i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  141. Gender perspective of psychological discomfort during COVID-19 confine...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  142. Wenn Autorinnen Kinder bekommen – Mutterschaft als Schreibblockade
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  143. The role of oxytocin in regulating loneliness in old age
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  144. Remodeling writers’ composing processes: Implications for writing asse...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  145. Exploring the short-term and maintained effects of strategic instructi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  146. The impact of self-assessment, planning and goal setting, and reflecti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  147. Learning Effect in a Multilingual Web-Based Argumentative Writing Inst...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  148. Service Quality in Tourism Public Health: Trust, Satisfaction, and Loy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  149. Investigating Students' Metacognitive Experiences: Insights From the E...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  150. Towards an Understanding of Program Writing as a Cognitive Process: An...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  151. Impacts of Self-Regulated Strategy Development-Based Revision Instruct...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  152. Evidence-based teaching of essay writing: Intervention at primary scho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  153. Is cognitive impairment associated with reduced syntactic complexity i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  154. Learning academic words through writing sentences and compositions: An...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  155. Application of a SCOBA in Educational Praxis of L2 Written Argumentati...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  156. Statewide implementation of automated writing evaluation: analyzing us...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  157. Automated Feedback and Automated Scoring in the Elementary Grades: Usa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  158. The effects of working memory and L2 proficiency on L2 writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  159. Postgraduate students’ beliefs about and confidence for academic writi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  160. Metacognitive strategy use in L2 writing assessment
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  161. Abusive Supervision, Affective Commitment, Customer Orientation, and P...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  162. Exploring the effects of strategy-focused instruction in writing skill...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  163. Improving student feedback literacy in academic writing: An evidence-b...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  164. Evaluating Writing Process Features in an Adult EFL Writing Assessment...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  165. Recognition and Respect: Centering Students’ Voices through writing Gr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  166. Peer review in academic writing: Different perspectives from instructo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  167. The cognitive profile and text-based traits of struggling writers (El ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  168. Linguistic patterns of spelling of isolated words to dictation and tex...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  169. Digital Articulation: Examining Text-Based Linguistic Performances in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  170. Prinzipien zur Förderung hierarchiehoher Prozesse
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  171. Genre-based revising strategies of graduate students in applied lingui...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  172. Developmental Profile of Social Communication: Findings in Typical Dev...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  173. The Process Corpus of English in Education: Going beyond the written t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  174. The Impact of Online and Face-to-Face Peer Feedback on Pre-Service Tea...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  175. Quelles stratégies pédagogiques participent au développement de la com...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  176. ‘I am perfectly imperfect because I am a media professional’: Assertin...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  177. Dialogue, erasure and spontaneous comments during textual composition:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  178. Chapter 1. Writing and language learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  179. Chapter 2. L2 writing and L2 learning: Transfer, self-regulation, and ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  180. Chapter 3. A dual-process model of L1 writing processes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  181. Changes in Revision Behaviours of L2 Writers in an Intensive English f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  182. Classification accuracy and efficiency of writing screening using auto...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  183. Planning in L1 and L2 writing: Working memory, process, and product
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  184. The 2030 Challenge in the Quality of Higher Education: Metacognitive, ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  185. Interplay Between Reading and Writing Under Different Teaching Models:...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  186. Examining the multidimensional role of self‐efficacy for writing on st...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  187. Who likes to engage in writing? – The role of children’s beliefs and i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  188. Die unangreifbare Phantasie vom Ich
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  189. Does a Process-Genre Approach Help Improve Students’ Argumentative Wri...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  190. Relationships between reading profiles and narrative writing abilities...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  191. THE ROLE OF HANDWRITING INSTRUCTION IN WRITERS’ EDUCATION
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  192. Writing and Revision Strategies of Students With and Without Dyslexia
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  193. A Curriculum Model for K–12 Writing Teacher Education
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  194. Longitudinal relationships between syntactic skills and Chinese writte...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  195. Zum Begriff der Sprachbewusstheit in der Schreibforschung und -didakti...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  196. Do executive functions contribute to writing quality in beginning writ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  197. The role of executive functions and transcription skills in writing: a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  198. Automated Writing Evaluation and Feedback: Multiple Metrics of Efficac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  199. Writing motivation and performance in Chinese children
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  200. Metacognitive components of writing: Construction and validation of th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  201. Introduction to the special issue on Written Language Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  202. Profiles of undergraduate student writers: Differences in writing stra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  203. Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  204. “Seeing” structure in text: 11th graders’ perception of relationship i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  205. Interactive Dynamic Literacy Model: An Integrative Theoretical Framewo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  206. Handschriften und Automatisierung des Schreibens in der 4. Jahrgangsst...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  207. Gender differences in writing: The mediating effect of language profic...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  208. Da leitura à reescrita: propostas e percursos da pedagogia baseada em ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  209. Analysis of Keystroke Sequences in Writing Logs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  210. Írást segítő és gátló tényezők egyetemi hallgatók körében
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  211. Writing Process Differences in Subgroups Reflected in Keystroke Logs
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  212. Unresolved issues in defining and assessing writing motivational const...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  213. Editorial: 25 Years of Assessing Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  214. Evaluation of a computer-based prompting intervention to improve essay...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  215. Evolving Structure of Descriptive Texts and Learners’ Abilities
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  216. Literacy-Related Abilities’ Effects on Argumentative Text Quality Stru...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  217. Assessing Self-Efficacy for Self-Regulation of Academic Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  218. EXPLORING SECOND LANGUAGE WRITERS’ PAUSING AND REVISION BEHAVIORS
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  219. MAPPING MASTER’S STUDENTS’ USE OF EXTERNAL SOURCES IN SOURCE-BASED WRI...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  220. LANGUAGE REFLECTION FOSTERED BY INDIVIDUAL L2 WRITING TASKS
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  221. METHODOLOGICAL ADVANCES IN INVESTIGATING L2 WRITING PROCESSES
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  222. Writer's Checklist: A Procedural Support for Struggling Writers
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  223. Contrasting Writing Practice Formats in a Writing Strategy Tutoring Sy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  224. Prediction of Essay Scores From Writing Process and Product Features U...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  225. Assessing student-writers’ self-efficacy beliefs about text revision i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  226. Struggling writers in elementary school: Capturing drivers of performa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  227. Functional abilities as reflected through temporal handwriting measure...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  228. ‘Monitoring’ in translation
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  229. Topic Development to Support Revision Feedback
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  230. Changing How Writing Is Taught
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  231. Are reading and writing building on the same skills? The relationship ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  232. Writing task complexity, students’ motivational beliefs, anxiety and t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  233. Exploring individual and gender differences in early writing performan...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  234. Entwicklung rezeptiver und produktiver schriftsprachlicher Fähigkeiten...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  235. Biscriptuality
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  236. A Multilingual Copy Task: Measuring Typing and Motor Skills in Writing...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  237. Writers in Community Model: 15 Recommendations for Future Research in ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  238. „Beim Schreiben bleibt er unter seinem Niveau“ – Geschlechtsunterschie...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  239. Corpus et activité rédactionnelle d’adolescents dyslexiques dysorthogr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  240. Scaling Academic Writing Instruction: Evaluation of a Scaffolding Tool...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  241. An Analysis of the Methods of Secondary Writing in the United States: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  242. Writing Processes in Short Written Responses to Questions Probing Prio...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  243. Conceptualizing Writing Self‐Efficacy in English as a Foreign Language...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  244. Introduction to Discourse Studies
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  245. Understanding online revisions in L2 writing: A computer keystroke-log...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  246. Scaffolding for Independence: Writing-as-Problem-Solving Pedagogy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  247. A Revised Writer(s)-Within-Community Model of Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  248. The Work of Writing: Raiding the Inarticulate
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  249. Teaching textual awareness with DocuScope: Using corpus-driven tools a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  250. Texting in motion: Keystroke logging and observing synchronous mobile ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  251. Effects of motivational regulation strategies on writing performance: ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  252. Discovery Through Writing: Relationships with Writing Processes and Te...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  253. Critical Issues in the Understanding of Young Elementary School Studen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  254. Impact of handwriting training on fluency, spelling and text quality a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  255. Scaffolding genre knowledge and metacognition: Insights from an L2 doc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  256. Universal screening with automated essay scoring: Evaluating classific...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  257. Références bibliographiques
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  258. Tracking the Real‐Time Evolution of a Writing Event: Second Language W...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  259. Writing fluency in patients with low‐grade glioma before and after sur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  260. Improvement of handwriting automaticity among children treated for gra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  261. Distributed Cognition and Embodiment in Text Planning: A Situated Stud...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  262. Attention and written expression in school-age, high-functioning child...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  263. Writing regulation processes in higher education: a review of two deca...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  264. Writing proficiency level and writing development of low-achieving ado...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  265. Exploring the potential of process-tracing technologies to support ass...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  266. Spelling while writing texts
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  267. Chapter 11. How editors read
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  268. The Effect of Speech-to-Text Technology on Learning a Writing Strategy
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  269. The elaboration of motor programs for the automation of letter product...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  270. Human Systems Engineering and Educational Technology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  271. Human Systems Engineering and Educational Technology
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  272. Connaissances métacognitives et stratégies d’autorégulation impliquées...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  273. Hunting for the links between word-level writing skills and text quali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  274. Effects of Dictation, Speech to Text, and Handwriting on the Written C...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  275. Automated formative writing assessment using a levels of language fram...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  276. College student perceptions of writing errors, text quality, and autho...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  277. Exploring the effectiveness of integrating augmented reality-based mat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  278. The effects of genetic and environmental factors on writing developmen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  279. Development of a method to study real-time engineering writing process...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  280. Profiling writers: analysis of writing dynamics among college students
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  281. Typing competencies in Alzheimer's disease: An exploration of copy tas...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  282. How do question writers compose external examination questions? Questi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  283. Assessing peer and instructor response to writing: A corpus analysis f...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  284. A Simple View of Writing in Chinese
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  285. Literatur
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  286. The Effects of Mode and Task Complexity on Second Language Production
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  287. The impact of developmental dyslexia and dysgraphia on movement produc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  288. Presentation, expectations, and experience: Sources of student percept...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  289. Cognitive Load Theory, Element Interactivity, and the Testing and Reve...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  290. The Effects of Rhetorical and Content Subgoals on Writing and Learning
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  291. Associated effects of automated essay evaluation software on growth in...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  292. The role of transcription skills and oral language skills in Chinese w...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  293. Thinking aloud during idea generating and planning before written tran...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  294. Peer feedback in second language writing (2005–2014)
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  295. Automated essay evaluation software in English Language Arts classroom...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  296. The Impact of Oral and Written Feedback on EFL Writers With the Use of...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  297. Student, teacher and class-level correlates of Flemish late elementary...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  298. Sources of Individual Differences in L2 Narrative Production: The Cont...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  299. The study on the motivational factor in the writing of KAP learners
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  300. A Study on Writing Difficulty of Elementary, Middle, High School Stude...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  301. The Effectiveness of Synchronous and Asynchronous Written Corrective F...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  302. Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Impr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  303. Fostering Strategic Learning: The Development and Validation of the Wr...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  304. A Developmental Perspective on the Units of Written French
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  305. Linguistic Correlates of Text Quality from Childhood to Adulthood
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  306. Comparing the accuracy of different scoring methods for identifying si...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  307. Using Automated Feedback to Improve Writing Quality
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  308. An Attempt to Extend Time and Space of the Cognitive Model of Writing
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  309. Exploring the Feasibility of Using Writing Process Features to Assess ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  310. Process Features in Writing: Internal Structure and Incremental Value ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  311. Can Cognitive Writing Models Inform the Design of the Common Core Stat...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  312. The dimensions of written expression: Language group and gender differ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  313. How Do User Groups Cope with Delay in Real-Time Collaborative Note Tak...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  314. Analyzing writing process data
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  315. L2 Creative Writers' Identities: Their Cognitive Writing Processes and...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  316. Electronic outlining as a writing strategy: Effects on students' writi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  317. Cognitive Strategies and Affective Responses of Student Writer accordi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  318. Learning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  319. Theoretical reevaluation of research in the writing processes
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  320. Phase Transitions in Development of Writing Fluency From a Complex Dyn...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  321. Using Digital Knowledge Maps for Supporting Tutors Giving Effective Ex...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  322. The internal dimension of tasks
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  323. Task, task performance, and writing development
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  324. Keystroke Logging in Writing Research...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  325. Typewriting Dynamics: What Distinguishes Simple From Complex Writing T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  326. On the relation between automated essay scoring and modern views of th...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  327. Effects of Emotion on Writing Processes in Children
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text