Daily rhythms in sexually relevant behaviors are commonly regulated by circadian clocks in insects. In most moth species, females rely on sex pheromones to attract males before mating, and several mechanisms have been proposed to prevent costly interspecific attraction. Several studies have focused on temporal isolation of sexual activity in closely related insect species. A prime example is the Queensland fruit flies
Bactrocera tryoni and
Bactrocera neohumeralis, which occur as sympatric species even though laboratory hybrids, including all backcrosses, are fully fertile. Whereas
B. neohumeralis mates at high light intensity and during the midday,
B. tryoni prefers mating at low light intensities and at dusk. This difference in behavior causes practically complete reproductive isolation (
Smith, 1979).
This study focuses on 2 species of pyralid moths, the Mediterranean flour moth,
Ephestia kuehniella, and the Indian meal moth,
Plodia interpunctella (both Lepidoptera: Pyralidae), which are cosmopolitan pests that feed on a wide variety of stored products. These species are almost exclusively found indoors and have most likely been dispersed from their original habitats by transportation of food products (
Palm, 1986). Like the majority of moth species,
E. kuehniella and
P. interpunctella females rely on sex pheromones to attract males before mating, and several sex pheromone components have been identified in both species (e.g.,
Zhu et al., 1999;
Ryne, 2001). Like the mentioned
Lymantria and
Spodoptera species,
E. kuehniella and
P. interpunctella share the same main pheromone component, (
Z,E)-9,12-tetradecadienyl acetate (Z,E-9,12-14:OAc), which is also used by several other closely related species, such as
Ephestia elutella and
Cadra cautella (
Kuwahara and Casida, 1973). As this compound alone is sufficient to attract males (
Zhu et al., 1999;
Kuwahara and Hara, 1971) and several species may occur in sympathy, mechanisms to avoid interspecies attraction have likely evolved even though the 2 species never crossbreed. The primary aim of this study was therefore to compare circadian rhythms of sexually relevant behavior in
E. kuehniella and
P. interpunctella to find indications of divergent phase shifts in behavioral activity.
Immunohistochemical investigation was focused on neuropeptide pheromone biosynthesis activating neuropeptide (PBAN), corazonin (Crz), and pigment dispersing factor (PDF), supposedly involved in the circadian signal output regulating the daily activities. PBAN is a 33 or 34 amino acid peptide stimulating sex pheromone production in female moths and plays a key role in temporal regulation of pheromone communication (
Raina et al., 1989). The undecapeptide corazonin was discovered by
Veenstra (1989) as a cardioaccelerator in cockroaches and subsequently was found in other insects including moth species
Bombyx mori (
Hua et al., 2000),
Galleria mellonella (
Hansen et al., 2001), and
Manduca sexta (
Wise et al., 2002). Crz-immunoreactivity (Crz-ir) in neurons that express clock proteins (
Wise et al., 2002;
Qi-Mao et al., 2003) links it to circadian output pathway. PDF is an insect homologue of the pigment dispersing hormone that was isolated as a regulator of pigmentation in crustaceans (
Rao and Riehm, 1988) and functions as a key mediator in the circadian clock of
Drosophila melanogaster (see
Taghert and Shafer, 2006).
We studied daily rhythms in female calling behavior (pheromone release) of both species under a light-dark cycle (LD), continuous darkness (DD), and continuous light (LL). The results confirm not only temporally separate peaks in sexual activity but also major differences in their responses to constant light conditions. We also present comparative data of PBAN-immunoreactivity (PBAN-ir), Crz-ir, and PDF-immunoreactivity (PDF-ir) in the brain-subesophageal complex and in the neurohemal organs of the 2 moth species.
Discussion
We conclude that the daily temporal allocation of female calling behavior differs in the 2 pyralid moth species E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella. Females of the 2 species release the sex pheromone to attract males at different times of the night, dawn and dusk, respectively, and the calling behavior is affected differently by constant light conditions. The calling rhythm in E. kuehniella shows characteristics of circadian regulation as the rhythm is persistent in constant darkness and the behavior is suppressed by constant light. On the contrary, females of P. interpunctella turn arrhythmic in DD but continue to call in both constant dark and light. Males of both species show persistent daily rhythms in locomotor activity in constant darkness.
The original habitats of our studied species are not known, and they are almost exclusively found indoors, that is, in artificial and—from an evolutionary perspective—recent environments. It is therefore hard to speculate how the asynchrony in daily sexual behaviors has evolved. However, several of the closely related pyralid species share the same main pheromone component, and indirect selection on males occurs already during the mate search and localization of females by sex pheromone cues (see
Wiley and Poston, 1996, for a general discussion of indirect female choice). In a competitive environment with more than 1 species present, it is therefore plausible that a shift of the activity peak may have been beneficial to avoid costly and time-consuming interspecific attractions.
A closer examination of
P. interpunctella calling in constant darkness reveals that even though females never ceased calling at any time of day, the highest numbers of calling females were persistently obtained at hours corresponding to lights-off. This suggests that the onset of calling behavior may nevertheless be regulated by a clock mechanism but that the termination of calling is dependent on the lights-on cue. However this hypothesis is contradicted by high calling activity in constant light (
Fig. 1F). Since
P. interpunctella females showed no calling rhythm in constant darkness from the very beginning, it is unlikely that desynchronization between individuals caused the overall arrhythmicity. However, desynchronization would explain the gradual dampening of the
E. kuehniella rhythm in DD.
Circadian clocks use changes in light conditions to synchronize with the environment, and if constant light suppresses calling behavior in E. kuehniella, why do P. interpunctella females continue to call in constant light? One explanation is that the suppression of calling behavior in E. kuehniella occurs independently of the clock mechanism. This would require, however, that the 2 species show differences in a secondary light input system, which affects the behavior independently of the clock function. We find it more likely that either the calling behavior in P. interpunctella is disconnected from the circadian clock mechanism or the clock output signal that regulates calling differs between the 2 species.
Male mate search, and subsequently reproduction, require locomotor activity, and we therefore use locomotor activity as an indicator of hours when mate search would primarily occur. E. kuehniella males showed highest locomotor activity at the end of the scotophase, which corresponds very well with the observed peaks in female calling activity. The locomotor activity rhythm in P. interpunctella was highest during hours corresponding to the early scotophase.
The performed immunostainings showed minor differences in distribution or localization of PBAN-ir, Crz-ir, and PDF-ir in the cephalic ganglia of both species (Suppl. Table S1). The neuropeptides PBAN, corazonin, and PDF have all been proposed to be essential for clock output and showed strong staining patterns in both E. kuehniella and P. interpunctella brains. No differences in distribution of PBAN-ir, Crz-ir, and PDF-ir were revealed with respect to both the sex and the time points of the LD cycle (see Suppl. Table S1, Suppl. Figs. S3, S4).
PBAN polypeptides are members of the pyrokinin family with different physiological functions in insects and are characterized by a common C-terminal sequence called FXPRLamide (
Abernathy et al., 1996). The PBAN-ir does not differ substantially between the 2 species, apart from an additional group of 5 small cells in the medial SLP in
E. kuehniella (Suppl. Table S1,
Fig. 2G). The strongly stained cells in the SOG were found in the Mdb, Mxl, and Lb neuromere of the SOG in both species. Previous studies revealed that 3 clusters of neurosecretory cells in the midventral SOG showed strong immunoreactivity with antiserum against PBAN in several other moths as well:
Helicoverpa zea (
Ma et al., 1996),
Agrotis ipsilon (
Duportets et al., 1998),
Agrotis segetum (
Závodská et al., 2009), and tortrix
Adoxophyes sp. (
Choi et al., 2004). In both examined moths, immunopositive fibers from the
pars intercerebralis led into the
nervi corporis cardiaci (NCC1+2) and ramified in the CC (
Fig. 2A,
K), where immunostained cells in the tritocerebrum likely sent their processes via the NCC 3 (
Fig. 2J). These results suggest that PBAN-like peptide synthesized in both
E. kuehniella and
P. interpunctella brain neurons is transported to the CC before its release into the hemolymph and transfer to the pheromone gland.
Nässel (2002) suggested that corazonin, an 11 amino acid neuropeptide, functions as both a humoral factor and a neuromodulator, which are both plausible roles in output pathways of circadian clock. Its linkage to circadian clock pathways is based on its co-expression in cells expressing clock protein Period in the
Antheraea pernyi brain (
Sauman and Reppert, 1996;
Sauman et al., 2005) as well as in the
M. sexta brain (
Wise et al., 2002).
Interestingly, the distributions of Crz-ir in
P. interpunctella and
E. kuehniella do differ (Suppl. Table S1). Whereas
E. kuehniella shows 2 stained cells in the SOG with no equivalent in
P. interpunctella, the latter species shows 2 cells in caudal part of ventrolateral protocerebrum and 4 small cells in the tritocerebrum (
Fig. 3).
In
E. kuehniella we detected prominent Crz-like staining in photoreceptors and fibers running over frontal surface of lamina and medulla neuromere in the OL (
Fig. 3N,
O), which is a unique Crz-ir distribution not only in moths but even in other insects tested previously (e.g.,
Sehadová et al., 2007;
Závodská et al., 2008). We observed positive immunostaining with antiserum against [His 7]-corazonin in photoreceptors of all 12 examined
E. kuehniella heads but never saw an immunopositive signal in the photoreceptors of
P. interpunctella, although samples of both moth species were treated together under the same conditions. In addition, we observed clear staining in 4 perikarya in CC of
E. kuehniella. Although it cannot be entirely excluded that an artifact in the eye and CC occurred during the immunohistochemical process, which gave an unspecific staining, we are convinced that the positive reaction in photoreceptors and cells in the CC was specific considering the reliability of antiserum against [His
7]-corazonin (
Roller at al., 2003). We would not venture to claim that the Crz-like substance recognized by the antibody in the photoreceptors is also produced in these cells or attempt to assign any function to this compound in the photoreceptors, yet it is remarkable that such differences in the staining pattern were observed in the 2 species. The differences in expression patterns between these closely related species at least suggest that corazonin was subjected to a selective pressure over time.
PDF is an 18 amino acid neuropeptide that is essential for maintained locomotor activity rhythms in
Drosophila (
Renn et al., 1999;
Helfrich-Förster, 2005). PDF homologues (which usually differ only by 2 amino acid substitutions) have been identified in diverse insect species (reviewed by
Hamasaka et al., 2005). Both examined species of moths possess 4 small but clearly stained cells in the Pfv region of the OL (
Fig. 4), which is a typical location of PDF-ir cells in
Drosophila and other insect species (
Sehadová et al., 2003;
Závodská et al., 2003). Expression patterns of PDF-ir vary only slightly in the number of SLP, PI, and SOG cells in moth brains, but no equivalent cells in the interior medial protocerebrum were detected in
P. interpunctella (Suppl. Table S1).
To summarize, the circadian regulation of the sex pheromone communication in P. interpunctella and E. kuehniella shows remarkable differences. The restriction of their sexual activity to different hours of the day suggests that the differences may be due to temporal divergence in the sex communication, between either these or other species relying on the same sex pheromone components. Since effective reproduction requires synchronized behaviors in both sexes, this temporal shift in activity has affected both males and females, as would be expected. The variances in the expression patterns of especially corazonin indicate that differences between the 2 species occur also on a molecular level and in the pathways by which the circadian rhythms are regulated.