Molecular models of the clock that produces circadian rhythms have been postulated in various organisms (
Bell-Pedersen et al., 2005). In insects, a molecular model of the circadian clock was first proposed in the fruit fly
Drosophila melanogaster (
Hardin, 2005;
Hardin et al., 1990). This clock model is described as an ensemble of interlocked negative transcription/translation feedback loops. In each loop, positive elements, such as
cycle and
Clock, drive the transcription of negative elements, such as
period (
per) and
timeless (
tim), which rhythmically feed back to inhibit the action of the former (
Sandrelli et al., 2008;
Tomioka and Matsumoto, 2015).
In Lepidoptera as well, circadian rhythms have been reported both in behavioral activities and developmental events, such as hatching and adult eclosion (
Broadhead et al., 2017;
Kamimura and Tatsuki, 1994;
Sakamoto et al., 2003;
Sakamoto and Shimizu, 1994;
Shimizu and Matsui, 1983;
Suszczynska et al., 2017). However, the molecular clock producing these rhythms has not been clarified yet. The expression of
per has been reported in several lepidopteran species, including the silkmoth
Bombyx mori (
Kotwica et al., 2009;
Kobelkova, 2015;
Sauman and Reppert, 1996;
Sehadova et al., 2004;
Wise et al., 2002). Unlike in other insects, including
D. melanogaster, temporally regulated movement of the
per product protein PERIOD (PER) into the nucleus is not observed in the brain of the Chinese tussar moth,
Antheraea pernyi (
Sauman and Reppert, 1996), and also, the tobacco hornworm,
Manduca sexta, shows no rhythmic expression of
per (
Wise et al., 2002). Moreover, even though many studies in Lepidoptera have shown temporally regulated expression of
per (
Iwai et al., 2006;
Kotwica et al., 2009;
Kobelkova, 2015;
Sauman and Reppert, 1996;
Tao et al., 2017), the role of
per in a behavioral or developmental rhythm has been unequivocally demonstrated only in the sperm release rhythm of moths (
Kotwica et al., 2009). Thus, it remains necessary to examine the circadian clock in Lepidoptera further, with special reference to the role of
per.
Suppressing mRNA expression by RNAi is an effective means of studying clocks in some insects (
Moriyama et al., 2008,
Uryu et al., 2013). Although RNAi has been applied to study the circadian clock in Lepidoptera, the knockdown of
per by RNAi continued for less than 24 h and, although it caused a delay of sperm release (
Kotwica et al., 2009), it produced only a slight effect on behavioral rhythm (
Sandrelli et al., 2007). It is thus difficult to examine the mechanism of the circadian clock over the long term using RNAi in Lepidoptera. As an alternative to RNAi, genome editing techniques can be applied to Lepidoptera to establish specific gene knockout strains. Indeed, knockout strains of
Clock and
cry2 have been described for the monarch butterfly,
Danaus plexippus, with the circadian rhythm in eclosion was shown to be disrupted in both (
Merkert et al., 2016;
Merlin et al., 2013). Thus, genome editing techniques can help to reveal the connection between clock genes and behavioral rhythms.
Discussion
We established a
per knockout strain using TALEN in
B. mori, and this is the first
per-knockout strain in insects excluding
D. melanogaster. The
per knockout strain of
B. mori produced in the present study showed periodic patterns in hatching and eclosion under LD 12:12 conditions, but did not show free-running rhythms under LL or DD conditions. From these results, we concluded that
per is indispensable for circadian rhythms in this species. In the
per knockout strain, moreover, no temporal change in expression was observed for
per or
tim, and the expression levels of
per and
tim were lower and higher, respectively, than those of the wild type used in the present study (
pnd w-1). Moreover,
Tao et al. (2017) showed entry of PER into the nucleus in
B. mori, suggesting a molecular feedback loop that includes
per in the circadian hatching rhythm of this insect. Therefore, we suggest that the molecular feedback loop involving
per and
tim was disrupted in the
per knockout strain, and that this disruption probably caused the arrhythmicity of behavioral rhythms.
The level of
per expression was extremely low at all time points in the
per knockout strain. If this strain lacks negative feedback by PER/TIM, one could have anticipated that this strain would show high expression levels of
per at all time points, like those of
tim. However, the results contradicted this anticipation. In the
per0 mutant of
D. melanogaster, in which the negative feedback loop of PER/TIM was established, the
per expression level showed no consistent rhythmic fluctuation and was approximately 50% of that in the wild type at its peak (
Hardin et al., 1990;
van Gelder and Krasnow, 1996); thus, the results in
D. melanogaster also cannot be simply explained by the lack of the negative feedback. Instead, the low expression levels of
per can be explained by nonsense-mediated mRNA decay (NMD), which is known to occur generally for mRNA surveillance in eukaryotes: most mRNAs that cannot be translated along their full length are rapidly degraded (
Cullbertson, 1999). Expression depression and disappearance of mRNA by NMD have been reported in
B. mori (
Komoto et al., 2009) and therefore
per mRNA was probably degraded by NMD in the
per knockout strain in the present study because the
per mRNA in this strain cannot be translated along its full length.
The wild-type strain used in the present study showed circadian rhythms in hatching and eclosion, as reported in other strains (
Tanaka, 1966a;
1966b;
1966c;
Oshiki and Watanabe, 1978a,
1978b;
Sakamoto and Shimizu, 1994;
Sakamoto et al., 2003;
Shimizu and Matsui, 1983). In developed embryos of this strain, temporal changes in the expression of
per and
tim were observed during the day. Expression peaks occurred in the early scotophase, and expression levels were low in the photophase. Similar expression trends were reported in the adult brain and larval midgut of
B. mori (
Iwai et al., 2006;
Nobata et al., 2012).
Tao et al. (2017) showed in the embryo of this species that the expression peak of
per also resides in the earlier scotophase but that of
tim occurred in the later scotophase. The differences between the results of
Tao et al. (2017) and the present study in
tim expression may be due to the difference in the strains.
In the
per knockout strain under LD conditions, there was an eclosion peak immediately after lights-on, but this peak was not observed in the wild type. In the eclosion rhythm of other strains previously studied, there were 2 peaks: one in the scotophase and the other immediately after lights-on under LD conditions (
Shimizu and Matsui, 1983; Ohsiki and Watanabe, 1978).
Shimizu and Matsui (1983) concluded that the eclosion peak immediately after lights-on is produced by a masking effect: a direct response to light. We suggest, therefore, that, in
pnd w-1, this direct response to light is concealed by a strong suppressive effect on circadian rhythm. In the
per knockout strain, however, suppression by the circadian rhythm is negated and the direct response to light becomes obvious.
In the hatching rhythm of
B. mori,
Sakamoto et al. (2003) hypothesized that a carotenoid-dependent hourglass mechanism suppresses hatching after lights-off. This mechanism suppresses hatching on the first day under DD conditions and in the scotophase under LD conditions. In the present study, however, this suppression was not observed in either the wild-type or the
per knockout strain. This difference might be due to the use of strains with different genetic backgrounds: we used a strain without a diapause due to its
pnd background, whereas
Sakamoto et al. (2003) used a diapause strain and artificially terminated the diapause by acid treatment.
In the present study, we established a
per-knockout strain in
B. mori, and showed that
per is essential for the expression of circadian rhythms at the behavioral and molecular levels. In the monarch butterfly,
Danaus plexippus, the circadian eclosion rhythm was inhibited by the knockout of 2 other clock genes,
Clock and
cryptochrome-2 (
cry-2) (
Markert et al., 2016;
Merlin et al., 2013). These results show that the knockout method is a powerful tool to investigate connections between clock genes and behavior in Lepidoptera, and demonstrate that the negative feedback loop of circadian rhythm previously established in various insects, including
D. melanogaster (
Sandrelli et al., 2008;
Tomioka and Matsumoto, 2015), also functions in Lepidoptera.
In the circadian clock of
D. melanogaster, per and
tim are the predominant negative elements in the negative feedback loop: PER and TIM form heterodimers and enter the nucleus to suppress their own transcription (
Hardin, 2005). In the honeybee
Apis melifera, however, there is no
tim, and
cry-2, which is different from
Drosophila type
cryptochrome (
d-cry or
cry-1), plays a similar role to that played by
tim in
D. melanogaster (
Rubin et al., 2006). Many other insects have both
tim and
cry-2, and their roles vary by species (
Tomioka and Matsumoto, 2015). In
A. pernyi and
D. plexippus (Lepidoptera), entry of PER into the nucleus has not been observed (
Sauman and Reppert, 1996;
Sauman et al., 2005).
Zhu et al. (2008) suggested that
cry-2 functions as a negative element without involvement of
per in the feedback loop of the circadian clock in
D. plexippus, in which the role of
per as a negative element in the feedback loop was not shown. In the present study, we showed that
per plays an essential role in the circadian clock of
B. mori, and our findings suggest that
tim is also involved in the negative feedback loop. In
B. mori, however, it has not been examined whether PER is involved in the regulation of
cry-2 expression or CRY-2 nuclear entry; although,
cry-2 does exist in this species (
Tao et al., 2017). The role of
cry-2 in the circadian clock of
B. mori is still unclear, and we cannot deny the possibility that the loss of circadian behavioral rhythms and
tim oscillations in the
per-knockout strain in
B. mori is intervened by the role of
cry-2. Further studies are needed to clarify the complete molecular clockwork of Lepidoptera. The next step is to examine the temporal localization of clock proteins, e.g., PER and CRY-2, in the
per knockout strain of
B. mori.