Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online April 7, 2020

Antibacterial activities and cell responses of Ti–Ag alloys with a hybrid micro- to nanostructured surface

Abstract

In this study, the surfaces of Ti–Ag casting alloys were modified by chemical treatment (acid etching combined with alkaline treatment) to produce hybrid micron and submicron porosities, sponge-like nanostructures and Ag-containing particles. The surface characteristics, ion release, pH values, antibacterial activities and cell responses of the chemically treated Ti–Ag (Ti–Ag(CT)) samples were investigated. The antibacterial activities of the Ti–Ag(CT) samples were assessed using Staphylococcus aureus, and these samples showed strong antibacterial activities that were attributed to Ag ion release and Ag-containing particles. The effects of Ti–Ag(CT) samples on cells were assessed using MC3T3-E1 mouse preosteoblasts; samples with 1 and 3 wt.% Ag showed higher cell adhesion and higher alkaline phosphatase values than those of commercially available pure Ti samples. These results indicated that Ti–Ag casting alloys with 1 and 3 wt.% Ag modified by chemical treatment prevented bacterial infection and have latent capacities to promote osseointegration.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Chen Q, Thouas GA. Metallic implant biomaterials. Mater Sci Eng R: Rep 2015; 87: 1–57.
2. Voigt J, Mosier M, Darouiche R. Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of antibiotics and antiseptics for preventing infection in people receiving primary total hip and knee prostheses. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2015; 59: 6696–6707.
3. Sadoghi P, Liebensteiner M, Agreiter M, et al. Revision surgery after total joint arthroplasty: a complication-based analysis using worldwide arthroplasty registers. J Arthroplast 2013; 28: 1329–1332.
4. Arciola CR, Campoccia D, Speziale P, et al. Biofilm formation in Staphylococcus implant infections: a review of molecular mechanisms and implications for biofilm-resistant materials. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 5967–5982.
5. Apostu D, Lucaciu O, Berce C, et al. Current methods of preventing aseptic loosening and improving osseointegration of titanium implants in cementless total hip arthroplasty: a review. J Int Med Res 2017; 46: 2104–2119.
6. Chernousova S, Epple M. Silver as antibacterial agent: ion, nanoparticle, and metal. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl 2013; 52: 1636–1653.
7. Qin H, Cao H, Zhao Y, et al. Antimicrobial and osteogenic properties of silver-ion-implanted stainless steel. ACS Appl Mater Interf 2015; 7: 10785–10794.
8. Duran N, Duran M, de Jesus MB, et al. Silver nanoparticles: a new view on mechanistic aspects on antimicrobial activity. Nanomedicine 2016; 12: 789–799.
9. Ferraris S, Spriano S. Antibacterial titanium surfaces for medical implants. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016; 61: 965–978.
10. Wafa H, Grimer RJ, Reddy K, et al. Retrospective evaluation of the incidence of early periprosthetic infection with silver-treated endoprostheses in high-risk patients. Bone Joint J 2015; 97B: 252–257.
11. Nakajo K, Takahashi M, Kikuchi M, et al. Inhibitory effect of Ti-Ag alloy on artificial biofilm formation. Dent Mater J 2014; 33: 389–393.
12. Chen M, Yang L, Zhang L, et al. Effect of nano/micro-Ag compound particles on the bio-corrosion, antibacterial properties and cell biocompatibility of Ti-Ag alloys. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2017; 75: 906–917.
13. Chen M, Zhang E, Zhang L. Microstructure, mechanical properties, bio-corrosion properties and antibacterial properties of Ti-Ag sintered alloys. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2016; 62: 350–360.
14. Cochran DL, Jackson JM, Bernard JP, et al. A 5-year prospective multicenter study of early loaded titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid-etched surface. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011; 26: 1324–1332.
15. Kang M-K, Moon S-K, Kwon J-S, et al. Antibacterial effect of sand blasted, large-grit, acid-etched treated Ti–Ag alloys. Mater Res Bull 2012; 47: 2952–2955.
16. Gittens RA, McLachlan T, Olivares-Navarrete R, et al. The effects of combined micron-/submicron-scale surface roughness and nanoscale features on cell proliferation and differentiation. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 3395–3403.
17. Li Y, Wang W, Liu H, et al. Formation and in vitro/in vivo performance of “cortex-like” micro/nano-structured TiO2 coatings on titanium by micro-arc oxidation. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2018; 87: 90–103.
18. Zhao G, Raines AL, Wieland M, et al. Requirement for both micron- and submicron scale structure for synergistic responses of osteoblasts to substrate surface energy and topography. Biomaterials 2007; 28: 2821–2829.
19. Zhao G, Zinger O, Schwartz Z, et al. Osteoblast-like cells are sensitive to submicron-scale surface structure. Clin Oral Implant Res 2006; 17: 258–264.
20. Zhao C, Zhu X, Liang K, et al. Osteoinduction of porous titanium: a comparative study between acid-alkali and chemical-thermal treatments. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 2010; 95: 387–396.
21. Oliveira DP, Palmieri A, Carinci F, et al. Gene expression of human osteoblasts cells on chemically treated surfaces of Ti-6Al-4V-ELI. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2015; 51: 248–255.
22. Lei Z, Zhang H, Zhang E, et al. Antibacterial activities and biocompatibilities of Ti-Ag alloys prepared by spark plasma sintering and acid etching. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2018; 92: 121–131.
23. 10993-12. ISO Biological evaluation of medical devices: sample preparation and reference materials, 2012.
24. 2801 JIS Z. Antimicrobial products-Test for antimicrobial activity and efficacy, 2000.
25. 10993-5 ISO. Biological evaluation of medical devices: tests for in vitro cytotoxicity, 2009.
26. Lin X, Zhou L, Li S, et al. Behavior of acid etching on titanium: topography, hydrophility and hydrogen concentration. Biomed Mater 2014; 9: 015002–012013.
27. 2399 SN/T. Evaluation method for antimicrobial metallic materials, 2010.
28. Cheng H, Xiong W, Fang Z, et al. Strontium (Sr) and silver (Ag) loaded nanotubular structures with combined osteoinductive and antimicrobial activities. Acta Biomater 2016; 31: 388–400.
29. Oliveira DP, Palmieri A, Carinci F, et al. Osteoblasts behavior on chemically treated commercially pure titanium surfaces. J Biomed Mater Res A 2014; 102: 1816–1822.
30. Mendonca G, Mendonca DB, Aragao FJ, et al. Advancing dental implant surface technology – from micron- to nanotopography. Biomaterials 2008; 29: 3822–3835.
31. Zhang E, Liu C. Effect of surface treatments on the surface morphology, corrosion property, and antibacterial property of Ti-10Cu sintered alloy. Biomed Mater 2015; 10: 045009.
32. Zhang X, Wu H, Geng Z, et al. Microstructure and cytotoxicity evaluation of duplex-treated silver-containing antibacterial TiO2 coatings. Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl 2014; 45: 402–410.
33. Huang Y, Zhang X, Zhang H, et al. Fabrication of silver- and strontium-doped hydroxyapatite/TiO2 nanotube bilayer coatings for enhancing bactericidal effect and osteoinductivity. Ceram Int 2017; 43: 992–1007.
34. Ovington LG. The truth about silver. Ostomy Wound Manage 2004; 50(9A Suppl): 1S–10S.
35. Greulich C, Braun D, Peetsch A, et al. The toxic effect of silver ions and silver nanoparticles towards bacteria and human cells occurs in the same concentration range. RSC Adv 2012; 2: 6981–6987.
36. Li J, Wang G, Wang D, et al. Alkali-treated titanium selectively regulating biological behaviors of bacteria, cancer cells and mesenchymal stem cells. J Colloid Interf Sci 2014; 436: 160–170.
37. Medveov A, Valk U. Staphylococcus aureus: characterisation and quantitative growth description in milk and artisanal raw milk cheese production. Struct Funct Food Eng. Epub ahead of print 22 August 2012.
38. Katsikogianni M, Missirlis YF. Concise review of mechanisms of bacterial adhesion to biomaterials and of techniques used in estimating bacteria-material interactions. Eur Cell Mater 2004; 8: 37–57.
39. Scheuerman TR, Camper AK, Hamilton MA. Effects of substratum topography on bacterial adhesion. J Colloid Interface Sci 1998; 208: 23–33.
40. Agarwal R, Garcia AJ. Biomaterial strategies for engineering implants for enhanced osseointegration and bone repair. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2015; 94: 53–62.
41. Anselme K. Osteoblast adhesion on biomaterials (Review). Biomaterials 2000; 21: 667–681.
42. Bacakova L, Filova E, Parizek M, et al. Modulation of cell adhesion, proliferation and differentiation on materials designed for body implants. Biotechnol Adv 2011; 29: 739–767.
43. Tweden KS, Cameron JD, Razzouk AJ, et al. Biocompatibility of silver-modified polyester for antimicrobial protection of prosthetic valves. J Heart Valve Dis 1997; 6: 553–561.
44. Hardes J, Streitburger A, Ahrens H, et al. The influence of elementary silver versus titanium on osteoblasts behaviour in vitro using human osteosarcoma cell lines. Sarcoma 2007; Article ID 26539.
45. Zhao L, Liu L, Wu Z, et al. Effects of micropitted/nanotubular titania topographies on bone mesenchymal stem cell osteogenic differentiation. Biomaterials 2012; 33: 2629–2641.
46. Lopez M, Bassi MA, Confalone L, et al. Titanium disk surfaces modulate dental implants osseointegration. Eur J Inflamm 2012; 10: 43–47.
47. Albrektsson T, Johansson C. Osteoinduction, osteoconduction and osseointegration. Eur Spine J 2001; 10: S96–S101.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: April 7, 2020
Issue published: May 2020

Keywords

  1. Titanium
  2. silver
  3. chemical treatment
  4. antibacterial property
  5. cell response

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.
PubMed: 32264765

Authors

Affiliations

Zeming Lei
Hand Surgery Ward, Central Hospital Attached to Shenyang Medical College, Shenyang, China
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery, The People's Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
Hangzhou Zhang
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
Erlin Zhang
Key Laboratory for Anisotropy and Texture of Materials (ATM), Education Ministry of China, School of Material Science and Engineering, Northeastern University, Shenyang, China
Junhua You
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Shenyang University of Technology, Shenyang, China
Xiaoxue Ma
Department of Medical Microbiology and Parasitology, College of Basic Medical Sciences, China Medical University, Shenyang, China
Xizhuang Bai
Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery, The People's Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China

Notes

Zeming Lei, Hand Surgery Ward, Central Hospital Attached to Shenyang Medical College, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery, The People's Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. Email: [email protected]
Xizhuang Bai, Department of Orthopedics and Sports Medicine and Joint Surgery, The People's Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Journal of Biomaterials Applications.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 176

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 8 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 6

  1. Experimental investigations of the structural, morphologic and mechani...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Additive manufacturing of anti-bacterial and low-cost Ti–Mo(–Ag) alloy...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. Biological properties of Cu-bearing and Ag-bearing titanium-based allo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  4. Structural, elastic and mechanical properties of Ti–15Nb–xGe alloys: i...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Zinc alloy-based bone internal fixation screw with antibacterial and a...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Alloy Design, Thermodynamics, and Electron Microscopy of Ternary Ti-Ag...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

IOM3 members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text