![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
A business school is a university-level institution that confers degrees in Business Administration. This paper examines the causes of business school reputation using two competing perspectives: the meritocratic and the institutional. The meritocratic perspective is based on the belief that reputation is an outcome of the business school’s achievements, which act as signals of organisational reputation. The institutional perspective highlights the importance of the institutional context in explaining reputation (business school past reputation and parent university reputation), minimising the effect of outcomes as reputation signals. The two perspectives are tested on a sample of US business schools via the use of multiple regressions and path analysis. The results lend weight to the institutional thesis, which brings into doubt the efficiency of short-term strategies that look to increase business school reputation.
Keywords reputation, business schools, universities, SEM techniques, USA
References
Section:
|
Adler, N., Harzing, A. (2009) ‘When knowledge wins: transcending the sense and nonsense of academic rankings'. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 8(1), 72–95. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Argenti, P. (2000) ‘Branding b-schools: reputation management for MBA programs'. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(2), 171–8. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Armstrong, J. S., Sperry, T. (1994) ‘Business school prestige – research versus teaching’. Interfaces, 24(2), 13–43. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Arpan, L., Raney, A., Zivnuska, S. (2003) ‘A cognitive approach to understanding university image’. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 8(2), 97–113. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Bennis, W., O’Toole, J. (2005) ‘How business schools lost their way’. Harvard Business Review, May, 96–104. Google Scholar | Medline | |
|
Boyd, B. K., Bergh, D. D., Ketchen, D. J. (2010) ‘Reconsidering the reputation–performance relationship: a resource-based view’. Journal of Management, 36(3), 588–609. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Chun, R. (2005) ‘Corporate reputation: meaning and measurement’. International Journal of Management Reviews, 7(2), 91–109. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
D’Aveni, R. A. (1996) ‘A multiple-constituency, status-based approach to interorganizational mobility of faculty and input-output competition among top business schools'. Organization Science, 7(2), 166–89. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Devinney, T., Dowling, G. R., Perm-Ajchariyawong, N. (2006) ‘The Business Schools Rankings Game’. AACSB. Retrieved 18 December 2006 from: http://www.aacsb.edu/resource_centers/Rankings. Google Scholar | |
|
Dichev, L. D. (1999) ‘How good are business schools rankings?’ Journal of Business, 72(2), 201–13. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Dill, D. D., Soo, M. (2005) ‘Academic quality, league tables, and public policy: a cross-national analysis of university ranking systems'. Higher Education, 49, 495–533. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Elsbach, K. D. (2006) Organizational Perception Management. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Google Scholar | |
|
Engwall, L. (2007) ‘Management education: research and practice’. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 23(1), 4–35. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fee, C. E., Hadlock, C. J., Pierce, J. R. (2005) ‘Business school rankings and business school deans: a study of nonprofit governance’. Financial Management, 34(1), 143–66. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fombrun, C. (1996) Reputation: Realizing Value from the Corporate Image. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Fombrun, C., Shandley, M. (1990) ‘What’s in a name? Reputation building and corporate strategy’. Academy of Management Journal, 33(2), 233–58. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gaines-Ross, L. (2000) ‘CEO reputation: a key factor in shareholder value’. Corporate Reputation Review, 3(4), 366–70. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gioia, D. A., Corley, K. G. (2002) ‘Being good versus looking good: business schools rankings and the circean transformation from substance to image’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 107–20. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Graham, H. D., Diamond, N. A. (1997) The Rise of American Research Universities: Elites and Challengers in the PostWar Era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., Black, W. C. (1998) Multivariate Data Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar | |
|
Hall, R. (1992) ‘The strategic analysis of intangible resources'. Strategic Management Journal, 13(2), 135–44. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Helm, S . (2006) Common Grounds in the Perception of Corporate Reputation? A Comparison of Three Stakeholder Groups. 10th Anniversary Conference on Reputation, Image, Identity and Competitiveness, New York, 25–28 May. Google Scholar | |
|
Jarvis, C. B., MacKenzie, S. B., Podsakoff, P. M. (2003) ‘A critical review of construct indicators and measurement model misspecification in marketing and consumer research’. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(2): 199–218. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Keith, B. (1999) ‘The institutional context of departmental prestige in American higher education’. American Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 409–45. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Keith, B. (2001) ‘Organizational contexts and university performance outcomes: the limited role of purposive action in the management of institutional status'. Research in Higher Education, 42(5), 493–516. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Kim, E. H., Zhu, M. (2010) ‘Universities as firms: the case of US overseas programs'. In Clotfelter, C. (ed.), American Universities in a Global Market. Chicago: NBER/University of Chicago Press, pp. 163–205. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lock, A. (1999) ‘Accreditation in business education’. Quality Assurance in Education, 7, 68–76. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Macdonald, I . (2006) ‘Offshore university campuses: bonus or baggage?’ in Critical Visions: Proceedings of the 29th HERDSA Annual Conference, Western Australia, 10–12 July. Published by the Higher Education Research and Development Society of Australasia, pp. 207–15. Google Scholar | |
|
Montero, J . (2010) Entry Modes: Implications of Reputation, Working Paper. University of Valencia. Google Scholar | |
|
Morgeson, F. P., Nahrgang, J. D. (2008) ‘Same as it ever was: recognizing stability in the Business Week rankings'. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 7, 26–41. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Pascarella, E. T., Terenzini, P. T. (1991) How College Affects Students: Findings and Insights from Twenty Years of Research. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Pfeffer, J., Fong, C. T. (2002) ‘The end of business schools? Less success than meets the eye’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 1(1), 78–95. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P. (2010) ‘Reputation as an intangible asset: reflections on theory and methods in two empirical studies of business school reputations'. Journal of Management, 36(3), 610–19. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., Sever, J. M. (2005) ‘Being good or being known: an empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation’. Academy of Management Journal, 48(6): 1033–49. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Safón, V. (2007) ‘Factors that influence recruiters' choice of business schools and their MBA graduates: evidence and implications for business schools'. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(2): 217–33. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Safón, V. (2009) ‘Measuring the reputation of top US business schools: a MIMIC modeling approach’. Corporate Reputation Review, 12(3): 204–28. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Schumacker, R. E., Lomax, R. G. (2004) A Beginner’s Guide to Structural Equation Modeling, 2nd edn. New York: Psychology Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Shapiro, C. (1983) ‘Premiums for high quality products as returns to reputations'. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 98(4), 659–80. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Shenkar, O., Yuchtman-Yaar, E. (1997) ‘Reputation, image, prestige, and goodwill: an interdisciplinary approach to organizational standing’. Human Relations, 50(11), 1361–81. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Shugan, S. M. (1996) Models, Theory and Selecting Research Topics: A Discussion. Paul D. Converse Marketing Symposium, University of Illinois, Proceedings. Google Scholar | |
|
Spence, M. (1973) ‘Job market signaling’. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 87(3): 355–74. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Standifird, S. S. (2005) ‘Reputation among peer academic institutions: an investigation of the US News and World Report’s rankings'. Corporate Reputation Review, 8(3), 233–44. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Sweitzer, K., Volkwein, F. (2009) ‘Prestige among graduate and professional schools: comparing the U.S. News' Graduate School Reputation Ratings between disciplines'. Research in Higher Education, 50(8), 812–36. Google Scholar | |
|
Terenzini, P. T., Pascarella, E. T. (1994) ‘Living with myths: undergraduate education in America’. Change, 26(1), 28–32. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Theus, K. T. (1993) ‘Academic reputations: the process of formation and decay’. Public Relations Review, 19(3), 277–91. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Thomas, H., Li, X. (2009) ‘Mapping globally branded business schools: a strategic positioning analysis'. Management Decision, 47(9), 1420–40. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Toutkoushian, R. K., Dundar, H., Becker, W. E. (1998) ‘The National Research Council Graduate Program Ratings: what are they measuring?’ Review of Higher Education, 21, 427–43. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Tracy, J., Waldfogel, J. (1997) ‘The best business schools: a market-based approach’. Journal of Business, 70(1), 1–31. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Trank, C. Q., Rynes, S. L. (2003) ‘Who moved our cheese? Reclaiming professionalism in business education’. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 2(2), 189–205. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Turban, D. B., Cable, D. M. (2003) ‘Firm reputation and applicant pool characteristics'. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(6), 733–51. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Turban, D. B., Greening, D. W. (1997) ‘Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees'. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 658–72. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Turban, D. B., Keon, T. L. (1993) ‘Organizational attractiveness: an interactionist perspective’. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 184–93. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Van de Ven, A. H., Johnson, P. E. (2006) ‘Knowledge for theory and practice’. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–21. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Vidaver-Cohen, D. (2007) ‘Reputation beyond the rankings: a conceptual framework for business school research’. Corporate Reputation Review, 10(4), 278–304. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Volkwein, J. F., Sweitzer, K. V. (2006) ‘Institutional prestige and reputation among research universities and liberal arts colleges'. Research in Higher Education, 47(2), 129–48. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Webster, D. S. (1992) ‘Reputational rankings of colleges, universities, and individual disciplines and fields of study from their beginnings to the present’. In Smart, J. C. (ed.), Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Vol. VIII. New York: Agathon Press, pp. 234–304. Google Scholar | |
|
Yang, S. U., Alessandri, S. W., Kinsey, D. F. (2008) ‘An integrative analysis of reputation and relational quality: a study of university–student relationships'. Journal of Marketing for Higher Education, 18(2): 145–70. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Zhelyazkov, P. I. (2006) The Royal Road to Success: Placement Outcomes of Ph.D. Students in Sociology 1993–2000. Retrieved 19 October 2010 from: http://www.soc.duke.edu/undergraduate/honors/pavel.pdf. Google Scholar |
