Abstract
This article focuses on head teachers’ experiences of inspection under Ofsted’s revised school inspection framework, their views of its principles and its implications for school leaders and leadership. The article draws on findings from a mixed-methods study to show that inspections are more focused on pupils’ attainment and progress. Head teachers intend to prioritize these and other judged areas over those no longer explicitly judged. Whilst broadly agreeing with the framework’s principles, many head teachers report that inspection was less positive owing to variation in inspector quality and rigidity in the (interpretation of the) framework. The article argues that leaders of schools serving socio-economically disadvantaged areas might find it harder to obtain a good Ofsted rating, with implications for head teacher recruitment and retention. It argues for improved Ofsted inspector training, a broad, values-driven leadership agenda by head teachers, and the recognition and promotion of contextual responses to educational challenges.
|
Ball, SJ (2003) The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy 18(2): 215–228. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Ball, SJ (2008) The legacy of ERA, privatization and the policy ratchet. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 36(2): 185–199. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Burden, R (1997) Research in the real world: An evaluation model for use by applied educational psychologists. Educational Psychology in Practice 13(1):13–20. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Chapman, C (2002) Ofsted and school improvement: Teachers’ perceptions of the inspection process in schools facing challenging circumstances. School Leadership & Management 22(3): 257–272. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Chapman, C, Harris, A (2004) Improving schools in difficult and challenging contexts: Strategies for improvement. Educational Research 46(3): 219–228. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Cohen, L, Manion, L, Morrison, K (2007) Research Methods in Education (6th edn). Abingdon: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Creswell, JW, Plano Clark, VL, Gutmann, ML, Hanson, WE (2003) Advanced mixed methods research designs. In: Tashakkori, A, Teddlie, C (eds) Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social and Behavioral Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 209–240. Google Scholar | |
|
Department for Education (2010) The Importance of Teaching: The Schools White Paper 2010. Norwich: The Stationery Office. Google Scholar | |
|
Ferguson, N, Earley, P, Ouston, J (1999) New heads, OFSTED inspections and the prospects for school improvement. Educational Research 41(3): 241–249. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gilroy, P, Wilcox, B (1997) Ofsted, criteria and the nature of social understanding: A Wittgensteinian critique of the practice of educational judgement. British Journal of Educational Studies 45(1): 22–38. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Hargreaves, A, Harris, A (2011) Performance Beyond Expectations. Nottingham: National College for School Leadership. Google Scholar | |
|
Hoyle, E, Wallace, M (2007) Educational reform: An ironic perspective. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 35(1): 9–25. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Morrison, K (2009) School inspection in small states and territories: An overview and case study of Macau. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education 39(6): 751–767. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Muijs, D, Chapman, C (2009) Accountability for improvement: rhetoric or reality? In: Chapman, C, Gunter, H (eds) Radical Reforms. Abingdon: Routledge, 28–41. Google Scholar | |
|
Ouston, J, Fidler, B, Earley, P (1997) What do schools do after OFSTED school inspections − or before? School Leadership & Management 17(1): 94–104. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Perryman, J (2006) Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy 21(2): 147–161. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Perryman, J (2009) Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy 24(5): 611–631. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Troman, G (1997) Self-management and school inspection: Complementary forms of surveillance and control in the primary school. Oxford Review of Education 23(3): 345–364. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Wright, N (2001) Leadership, ‘bastard leadership’ and managerialism: Confronting twin paradoxes in the Blair education project. Educational Management Administration & Leadership 29(3): 275–290. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Youngs, H, Piggot-Irvine, E (2012) The application of a multiphase triangulation approach to mixed methods: The research of an aspiring school principal development program. Journal of Mixed Methods Research 6(3):184–198. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals |

