![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
This article is a reflection upon the ethical dimension of my work and practice as an embedded researcher during my doctorate. To begin with, I describe my experiences of gaining ethical approval from The University of Manchester while also highlighting some of the concerns that were raised by the ethics board. This leads me to recognise how the inflexibility of such procedures are problematic for more unusual doctoral arrangements, such as embedded research. I then go on to engage with some of the real ethical complexities that I was forced to deal with as an embedded researcher. Here, I am mostly concerned with issues of positionality. From this, I identify the importance of developing ethical procedures to enable researchers to more fully engage with the ethics of their practice. Thus, I argue that in order to go beyond ethical approval functioning as a mere procedure or formality, the process needs to be developed so that doctoral students may be fully prepared to deal with the ethical issues they may face in the field. Finally, in light of the potential for embedded research to be an increasingly popular way to fund doctoral research, I recognise that such changes are particularly crucial as such students (due to their inexperience) may be unequipped to deal with the challenges that their position may bring.
References
|
Anyon, J (1997) Ghetto Schooling – A Political Economy of Urban Educational Reform. New York, NY: Teachers College Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Ball, S (1981) Beechside Comprehensive: A Case Study of Secondary Schooling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Bernstein, B (1970) Education cannot compensate for society. New Society 15: 344–347. Google Scholar | |
|
Beynon, J (1983) Ways in and staying in: Fieldwork as problem solving. In: Hammersley, M (ed.) The Ethnography of Schooling. Humberside: Nafferton Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Clifford, J, Marcus, G (1986) Writing Culture: The Politics and Poetics of Ethnography. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Cochran-Smith, M, Lytle, S (1993) Insider/Outside: Teacher Research and Knowledge. Columbia, NY: Teacher College Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Cochran-Smith, M, Lytle, S (1999) The teacher research movement: A decade later. Educational Researcher 28(7): 15–25. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Compton, DW, Baizerman, M, Stockdill, SH (eds) (2002) The Art, Craft and Science of Evaluation Capacity Building: New Directions for Evaluation. No. 93. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass. Google Scholar | |
|
Delamont, S (2002) Fieldwork in Educational Settings: Pitfalls and Perspectives (2nd edn). London: RoutledgeFalmer. Google Scholar | |
|
Donaldson, SI, Gooler, LE, Scriven, M (2002) Strategies for managing anxiety: Toward a psychlology of program evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 23(3): 261–273. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Geertz, C (1973) The Interpretation of Local Cultures. New York, NY: Basic Books. Google Scholar | |
|
Hargreaves, D (1967) Social Relations in a Secondary School. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Howes, AJ, Frankham, J, Ainscow, M. (2004) The action in action research: Mediating and developing inclusive intentions. Educational Action Research 12(2): 239–258. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Lacey, C (1970) Hightown Grammar: The School as a Social System. Manchester: Manchester University Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Lewis, SJ, Russell, AJ (2011) Being embedded: A way forward for ethnographic research. Ethnography 12(3): 398–416. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI | |
|
Love, AJ (1998) Internal evaluation: Integrating evaluation and social work. Scandinavian Journal of Social Welfare 7: 145–151. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
McGinity, R, Salokangas, M (2013) About the embedded researcher. Available at: http://theembeddedresearcher.wordpress.com/about/ (accessed June 2013). Google Scholar | |
|
McNiff, J (2013) Action Research: Principles and Practices. London: Routledge. Google Scholar | |
|
Nevo, D (2001) School evaluation: Internal or external. Studies in Educational Evaluation 27: 95–106. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rees, G, Power, S, Taylor, C (2007) The governance of educational inequalities: The limits of area-based initiatives. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis 9: 261–274. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Roper, L (2002) Achieving successful academic–practitioner research collaborations. Development in Practice 12 (3/4): 338–345. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Rosaldo, R (1989) Culture and Truth: The Remaking of Social Analysis. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. Google Scholar | |
|
Simpson, B (2011) Ethical moments: Future directions for ethical review and ethnography. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 17: 377–393. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Swaffield, S, MacBeath, J (2005) School self-evaluation and the role of a critical friend. Cambridge Journal of Education 35(2): 239–252. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Taut, S, Brauns, D (2003) Resistance to evaluation: A psychological perspective. Evaluation 9(3): 247–264. Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | |
|
Wong, S (2008) Tales from the frontline: The experiences of early childhood practitioners working with an ‘embedded’ research team. Evaluation and Program Planning 32: 99–108. Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI |
