![[PDF]](/pb-assets/Icons/adobe-pdf-icon-1498649896243.png){kind=icon}
Abstract
Recently, distributed leadership (DL) has become a popular approach to leadership across the social sciences, including education. This article documents reasons for the emergence of a distributed perspective and summarizes some of the background against which DL’s popularity emerged, in a field of study with a traditional adherence to leadership understood individually rather than collectively. When considered empirically, leadership practice in education and beyond is neither exclusively individual nor collective, but manifests degrees of co-existing individualism and collectivism. By implication, this hybrid or mixed patterning has to be reflected in a revised unit of leadership analysis. For this purpose, the article proposes a leadership configuration. To substantiate the argument, a range of illustrative social science evidence is drawn upon, some of which suggests that leadership hybridity may not merely be a contemporary phenomenon, but stretches back in time to include pre-modern social formations.
References
|
Blanton, RE (1998) Beyond centralization: Steps toward a theory of egalitarian behavior in archaic states. In: Feinman, GM, Marcus, J (eds) Archaic States. Santa Fe: School of American Research Press, 135–172. Google Scholar | |
|
Blanton, RE, Feinman, GM, Kowalewski, SA, Peregrine, PN (1996) A dual-processual theory for the evolution of Meso-Amercian civilization. Current Anthropology 37:1–14. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Bolden, R (2011) Distributed leadership in organizations: A review of theory and research. International Journal of Management Reviews 13(3):251–269. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Brown, A (2014) The Myth of the Strong Leader: Political Leadership in the Modern Age (London: Bodley Head). Google Scholar | |
|
Denis, J-L, Langley, A, Sergi, V (2012) Leadership in the plural. Academy of Management Annals 6:211–283. Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI | |
|
Feinman, GM (2001) Mesoamerican political complexity: The corporate-network dimension. In: Haas, J. (ed.) From Leaders to Rulers. Dordrecht: Kluwer/Plenum, 151–175. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Fitzpatrick, S (2015) On Stalin’s Team: The Years of Living Dangerously in Soviet Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Greenstein, FI (1969) Personality & Politics: Problems of Evidence, Inference and Conceptualization. New York: W.W. Norton. Google Scholar | |
|
Gronn, P (2008) The future of distributed leadership. Journal of Educational Administration 46(2):159–171. Google Scholar | Crossref | |
|
Gronn, P (2011) Hybrid configurations of leadership. In: Bryman, A, Collinson, D, Grint, K, Jackson, B, Uhl-Bien, M (eds) SAGE Handbook of Leadership. London: SAGE, 435–452. Google Scholar | |
|
Gronn, P (2015) Fortress days—1278 of them. In: Clift, R, Loughran, J, Mills, G, Craig, C (eds) Inside the Role of Dean: International Perspectives on Leading in Higher Education. London: Routledge, 49–62. Google Scholar | |
|
Gronn, P (2016a) Configured leadership. In: Peters, MA (ed.) Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory. London: Springer (in press). Google Scholar | |
|
Gronn, P (2016b) Instead of angels: Leaders, leadership and Longue Duree. In: Storey, J, Hartley, J, Denis, J-L, ‘t Hart, P, Ulrich, D (eds) The Routledge Companion to Leadership. London: Routledge (in press). Google Scholar | |
|
Hodgson, RC, Levinson, DJ, Zaleznik, A (1965) The Executive Role Constellation. Boston: Graduate School of Business Administration. Google Scholar | |
|
Hook, S (1945) The Hero in History: A Study in Limitation and Possibility. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers. Google Scholar | |
|
Kellerman, B (2012) The End of Leadership. New York: HarperCollins. Google Scholar |
