Skip to main content

[]

Intended for healthcare professionals
Skip to main content
Restricted access
Research article
First published online October 24, 2023

Aesthetic Approach for Critical Sociology of Contemporary Communication Technology

Abstract

Critical theory has already marked that technology often threatens civil liberties, personal autonomy, and rights. Heidegger, later Marcuse, emphasized how technology is not value-free in its own revealing power of the surrounding environment, external and inner nature. Throughout this paper, I explore how the aesthetic approach engages with critical theory and contributes to the sociology of media and communication. For this, I will theoretically survey the terms of sociality under the forces of immediate communication, ubiquitous surveillance, and the compression of time and space that Baudrillard and Virilio once problematized through the lens of critical technology theory to adapt it to media and communication studies. I contend that techno-aesthetics that converge with Rancière’s dissensus can provide practical suggestions on an updated vocation of critical sociology. This article discusses the potential of aesthetic and social criticism of media for democratizing technology that Feenberg inserted. It is urgent to acknowledge the changing spatio-temporal aesthetic regimes that affect the societal imagination and limits of sociality and action to determine the next steps for achieving a commons-based society.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Arda B (2016) The sublime in contemporary art and politics: the post 9/11 art of Middle Eastern diaspora in North America. PhD Thesis, York University, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Arda B (2019) Contemporary art on the current refugee crisis: the problematic of aesthetics versus ethics. British Journal of Middle Eastern Studies 46(2): 310–327.
Armitage J (1997) Accelerated aesthetics: Paul Virilio’s the vision machine. Angelaki 2(3): 199–209.
Baudrillard J (2002) The ecstasy of communication. In: Foster H (ed.) The Anti-Aesthetic: Essays on Postmodern Culture. New York: New Press, pp.126–133.
Bell WA Jr(2014) A Phenomenological take on the problem of reification. Moderna Språk 108(2): 1–16.
Benjamin W (1986) The work of art in the age of mechanical reproduction. In: Arendt H (ed.) Illuminations: Essays and Reflections. New York: Schocken Books, pp.217–252.
Berry DM, Dieter M (2015) Thinking postdigital aesthetics: art, computation and design. In: Berry DM, Dieter M (eds) Postdigital Aesthetics. London: Springer, pp.1–11.
Boltanski L (1999) Distant Suffering: Morality, Media and Politics (trans. GD Burchell, Cambridge Cultural Social Studies). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burke E (1998) A Philosophical Enquiry into the Sublime and Beautiful. London: Penguin.
Carr A (2000) Critical theory and the management of change in organizations. Journal of Organizational Change Management 13(3): 208–220.
Case A (2015) Calm Technology: Principles and Patterns for Non-Intrusive Design. Farnham: O’Reilly Media.
Chabot P (2013) The Philosophy of Simondon: Between Technology and Individuation. Edinburgh: A&C Black.
Chen K-H (1987) The masses and the media: Baudrillard’s implosive postmodernism. Theory, Culture & Society 4(1): 71–88.
Couldry N, Powell A (2014) Big data from the bottom up. Big Data & Society 1(2): 1–5.
Dean J (2012) The Communist Horizon. Verso Books.
Desan MH (2023) Realist and historicist modes of critique in critical sociology. Critical Sociology 49: 589–612.
Feenberg A (2002) Transforming Technology: A Critical Theory Revisited. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Feenberg A (2017) Technosystem: The Social Life of Reason. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press.
Feng TAO (2021) An overview on sci-technological aesthetics in the age of artificial intelligence. Philosophy Study 11(7): 527–532.
Fuchs C (2016) Critical Theory of Communication: New Readings of Lukács, Adorno, Marcuse, Honneth and Habermas in the Age of the Internet. Westminster: University of Westminster Press. Available at: https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/32047 (accessed 16 September 2023).
Fuchs C (2020) Towards a critical theory of communication as renewal and update of Marxist humanism in the age of digital capitalism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 50(3): 335–356.
Garlick S (2013) Complexity, masculinity, and critical theory: revisiting Marcuse on technology, Eros, and nature. Critical Sociology 39: 223–238.
Golding P, Murdock G (1978) Theories of communication and theories of society. Communication Research 5(3): 339–356.
Habermas J (2010) Technical progress and the social life-world. In: Hanks C (ed.) Technology and Values: Essential Readings. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell, pp.169–175.
Hand M (2016) 8# Boredom: technology, acceleration, and connected presence in the social media age. In: Gardiner ME, Haladyn JJ (eds) Boredom Studies Reader. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.127–141.
Heidegger M (2010) The question concerning technology. In: Hanks C (ed.) Technology and Values. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, pp.99–113.
Hickman LA (2006) From critical theory to pragmatism: Feenberg’s progress. In: Veak TJ (ed.) Democratizing Technology: Andrew Feenberg’s Critical Theory of Technology. Albany, NY: State of New York University Press, pp.71–84.
Horkheimer M, Adorno TW (2002) Dialectic of Enlightenment (ed. G Noeri). Redwood city, CA: Stanford University Press.
Johnson JA (2014) From open data to information justice. Ethics and Information Technology 16: 263–274.
Kant I (1987) Critique of Judgment (trans. WS Pluhar). 1st ed. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.
Kurvinen E, Koskinen I, Battarbee K (2008) Prototyping social interaction. Design Issues 24(3): 46–57.
Latour B (2007) Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lukács G (2017) Reification and the consciousness of the proletariat. In: Anderson KB (ed.) Karl Marx. Abingdon: Routledge, pp.3–25.
Luke TW (1991) Power and politics in hyperreality: the critical project of Jean Baudrillard. The Social Science Journal 28(3): 347–367.
Lunn E (1990) The Frankfurt School in the development of the mass culture debate. In: Roblin R (ed.) The Frankfurt School in the Development of the Mass Culture Debate. Lewiston, NY: Edwin Mellen Press, pp.26–84.
Mackinnon L (2016) Love’s algorithm: The perfect parts for my machine. In: Amoore L, Piotukh V (eds) Algorithmic Life: Calculative Devices in the Age of Big Data. New York: Routledge, pp.214–232.
Manovich L (2018) AI Aesthetics. Moscow: Strelka Press Moscow.
Marcuse H (2005) Heideggerian Marxism. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.
Marcuse H (2013) One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. London: Routledge.
Markham AN, Tiidenberg K, Herman A (2018) Ethics as methods: doing ethics in the era of big data research – Introduction. Social Media+ Society 4: 1–9.
Matteucci G (2016) The aesthetic as a matter of practices: form of life in everydayness and art. Comprendre 18(2): 9–28.
Meehan ER, Wasko J (2013) In defence of a political economy of the media. Javnost – The Public 20(1): 39–53.
Merleau-Ponty M (2002) Phenomenology of Perception. 2nd ed. London: Routledge.
Mosco V (2015) The political economy of communication: a living tradition. In: Albornoz L (ed.) Power, Media, Culture: A Critical View from the Political Economy of Communication. London: Springer, pp.35–57.
Ogbor JO (2001) Critical theory and the hegemony of corporate culture. Journal of Organizational Change Management 14(6): 590–608.
Patton P, Baudrillard J (1995) Introduction. In: Baudrillard J (ed.) The Gulf War Did Not Take Place. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press, pp.1–21.
Peters JD (1994) The gaps of which communication is made. Critical Studies in Media Studies 11(2): 117–140.
Plato HG (1961) Phaedrus. In: Hamilton E, Cairns H (eds) The Collected Dialogues of Plato. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp.475–525.
Rancière J (2010) Dissensus: On Politics and Aesthetics (ed. and trans. Corcoran S). London and New York: Bloomsbury Academic.
Reeves J (2016) Automatic for the people: the automation of communicative labor. Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 13(2): 150–165.
Saifer A, Dacin MT (2022) Data and organization studies: aesthetics, emotions, discourse and our everyday encounters with data. Organization Studies 43(4): 623–636.
Shapiro G (2003) Archaeologies of Vision: Foucault and Nietzsche on Seeing and Saying. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Sherry T (1995) Life on the Screen: Identity in the Age of the Internet. New York: Simon and Schuster.
Simpson LC (2014) Technology, Time, and the Conversations of Modernity. London: Routledge.
Smith D (2020) Surfaces and depths: an aesthetics of big data. In: Lushetich N (ed.) Big Data – A New Medium? London: Routledge.
Tassone G (2002) The possible wonders of technology. Beyond Habermas towards Marcuse: a critical framework for technological progress. In: Blackledge P, Kirkpatrick G (eds) Historical Materialism and Social Evolution. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.190–212.
The Washington Times (2006) Promise of AI not so bright. Available at: https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2006/apr/13/20060413-105217-7645r/ (accessed 18 September 2023).
Tierney KJ (1999) Toward a critical sociology of risk. Sociological Forum 14(2): 215–242.
Van Den Eede Y (2011) In between us: on the transparency and opacity of technological mediation. Foundations of Science 16: 139–159.
Van Dijck J (2014) Datafication, dataism and dataveillance: Big Data between scientific paradigm and ideology. Surveillance & Society 12(2): 197–208.
Virilio P (1995) Speed and information: cyberspace alarm! CTheory. Available at: https://journals.uvic.ca/index.php/ctheory/article/view/14657/5523
Virilio P (2012) The Administration of Fear. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
Zeilinger M (2021) Tactical Entanglements: AI Art, Creative Agency, and the Limits of Intellectual Property. Lüneburg: Meson Press.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
Email Article Link
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 24, 2023
Issue published: July 2024

Keywords

  1. aesthetics
  2. critical theory
  3. communication technology
  4. iTime
  5. democracy

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2023.
Request permissions for this article.

Authors

Affiliations

Notes

Balca Arda, Kadir Has University, Istanbul 34083, Turkey. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Critical Sociology.

View All Journal Metrics

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 386

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 0

Crossref: 2

  1. Re-evaluating creative labor in the age of artificial intelligence: a qualitative case study of creative workers’ perspectives on technological transformation in creative industries
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar
  2. Critical Sociology of Media and Communication: Connecting a Disconnected Field
    Go to citationCrossrefGoogle Scholar

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/EPUB

View PDF/EPUB

Full Text

View Full Text