Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals

Abstract

Hospitalists, or specialists of hospital medicine, have long been practicing in Canada and Europe. However, it was not until the mid-1990s, when hospitals in the U.S. started widespread adoption of hospitalists. Since then, the number of hospitalists has grown exponentially in the U.S. from a few hundred to over 50,000 in 2016. Prior studies on hospitalists have well documented benefits hospitals gain from adopting this innovative staffing strategy. However, there is a dearth of research documenting predictors of hospitals’ adoption of hospitalists. To fill this gap, this longitudinal study (2003–2015) purposes to determine organizational and market characteristics of U.S. hospitals that utilize hospitalists. Our findings indicate that private not-for-profit, system affiliated, teaching, and urban hospitals, and those located in higher per capita income markets have a higher probability of utilizing hospitalists. Additionally, large or medium, profitable hospitals, and those that treat sicker patients have a higher probability of adoption. Finally, hospitals with a high proportion of Medicaid patients have a lower probability of utilizing hospitalists. Our results suggest that hospitals with greater slack resources and those located in munificent counties are more likely to use hospitalists, while their under-resourced counterparts may experience more barriers in adopting this innovative staffing strategy.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

1. Wachter RM. An introduction to the hospitalist model. Ann Intern Med 1999; 130: 338–342.
2. Wachter RM, Goldman L. Zero to 50,000 – the 20th anniversary of the hospitalist. N Engl J Med 2016; 375: 1009–1011.
3. Epané JP, Weech-Maldonado R. Hospitalists as a staffing innovation: does it impact hospital efficiency? Innov Entrep Health 2015; 2: 1.
4. Wachter RM, Goldman L. The hospitalist movement 5 years later. JAMA 2002; 287: 487–494.
5. White HL, Glazier RH. Do hospitalist physicians improve the quality of inpatient care delivery? A systematic review of process, efficiency and outcome measures. BMC Med 2011; 9: 58.
6. Epané JP, Weech-Maldonado R, Hearld L, et al. Hospitals’ use of hospitalists: implications for financial performance. Health Care Manage Rev 2019; 44: 10–18.
7. Al‐Amin M, Li K. Hospitalists staffing levels and hospital performance. Health Serv Res 2020; 55: 44–53.
8. Coffman J, Rundall TG. The impact of hospitalists on the cost and quality of inpatient care in the United States: a research synthesis. Med Care Res Rev 2005; 62: 379–406.
9. Spaulding A, Choate S, Hamadi H, et al. The impact of hospitalists on value-based purchasing program scores. J Healthc Manag 2018; 63: e43–e58.
10. Hikmet N, Bhattacherjee A, Menachemi N, et al. The role of organizational factors in the adoption of healthcare information technology in Florida hospitals. Health Care Manag Sci 2008; 11: 1–9.
11. Kazley AS, Ozcan YA. Organizational and environmental determinants of hospital EMR adoption: a national study. J Med Syst 2007; 31: 375–384.
12. Wang BB, Wan TT, Burke DE, et al. Factors influencing health information system adoption in American hospitals. Health Care Manage Rev 2005; 30: 44–51.
13. Zhang NJ, Seblega B, Wan T, et al. Health information technology adoption in US acute care hospitals. J Med Syst 2013; 37: 1–9.
14. Harrison JP, Ogniewski RJ. The hospitalist model: a strategy for success in US hospitals? Health Care Manag (Frederick) 2004; 23: 310–317.
15. Banaszak-Holl J, Zinn JS, Mor V. The impact of market and organizational characteristics on nursing care facility service innovation: a resource dependency perspective. Health Serv Res 1996; 31: 97–117.
16. Chisholm L, Weech-Maldonado R, Landry AY, et al. The presence of hospital-based palliative care programs: a resource dependence perspective. Health Care Manage Rev 2015; 40: 356–362.
17. Patidar N, Weech-Maldonado R, O’Connor SJ, et al. Contextual factors associated with hospitals’ decision to operate freestanding emergency departments. Health Care Manage Rev 2017; 42: 269–279.
18. Ramamonjiarivelo Z, Weech-Maldonado R, Hearld L, et al. Public hospitals in financial distress: is privatization a strategic choice? Health Care Manage Rev 2015; 40: 337–347.
19. Pfeffer J, Salancik GR. The external control of organizations: a resource dependence approach. New York: Harper and Row Publishers, 1978.
20. Ulrich D, Barney JB. Perspectives in organizations: resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Acad Manage Rev 1984; 9: 471–481.
21. Pfeffer J, Pfeffer J. Power in organizations. Marshfield, MA: Pitman, 1981.
22. Peterson MC. A systematic review of outcomes and quality measures in adult patients cared for by hospitalists vs nonhospitalists. Mayo Clin Proc 2009; 84: 248–254.
23. Glasheen JJ, Misky GJ, Reid MB, et al. Career satisfaction and burnout in academic hospital medicine. Arch Intern Med 2011; 171: 782–785.
24. Baker LC, Bundorf MK, Devlin AM, et al. Medicare advantage plans pay hospitals less than traditional medicare pays. Health Aff (Millwood) 2016; 35: 1444–1451.
25. Kaluzny AD, McLaughlin CP, Jaeger BJ. TQM as a managerial innovation: research issues and implications. Health Serv Manage Res 1993; 6: 78–88.
26. Adler-Milstein J, Kvedar J, Bates DW. Telehealth among US hospitals: several factors, including state reimbursement and licensure policies, influence adoption. Health Aff (Millwood) 2014; 33: 207–215.
27. Tipping MD, Forth VE, O’Leary KJ, et al. Where did the day go? A time‐motion study of hospitalists. J Hosp Med 2010; 5: 323–328.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the SAGE Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: October 21, 2020
Issue published: August 2021

Keywords

  1. hospitalists
  2. market factors
  3. organizational characteristics
  4. resource dependence theory
  5. slack resources
  6. US hospitals

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2020.
Request permissions for this article.

History

Published online: October 21, 2020
Issue published: August 2021
PubMed: 33085543

Authors

Affiliations

Josue Patien Epane
Department of Health Care Administration and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Nevada Las Vegas, Las Vegas, USA
Robert Weech-Maldonado
Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
Larry R Hearld
Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
Bisakha Sen
Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
Stephen J O’Connor
Department of Health Services Administration, School of Health Professions, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
Luceta McRoy
Department of Health Care Organization and Policy, School of Public Health, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, USA
Washington Adventist University, Takoma Park, USA

Notes

Josue Patien Epane, University of Nevada Las Vegas, 4505 S Maryland Pkwy, Las Vegas, NV 89154, USA. Email: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Health Services Management Research.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 117

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016

Articles citing this one

Web of Science: 1 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 0

There are no citing articles to show.

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text