Skip to main content
Intended for healthcare professionals
Restricted access
Research article
First published online August 20, 2010

Illusory Shrinkage and Growth: Body-Based Rescaling Affects the Perception of Size

Abstract

The notion that apparent sizes are perceived relative to the size of one’s body is supported through the discovery of a new visual illusion. When graspable objects are magnified by magnifying goggles, they appear to shrink back to near-normal size when one’s hand (also magnified) is placed next to them. When objects are “minified” by minifying goggles, the opposite occurs. The rescaling effect also occurred when participants who were trained in tool use viewed the tool next to the objects. However, this change in apparent size does not occur when familiar objects or someone else’s hand is placed next to the magnified or minified object. Presumably, objects’ apparent sizes shift closer to their actual sizes when one’s hand is viewed because objects’ sizes relative to the hand are the same with or without the goggles. These findings highlight the role of body scaling in size perception.

Get full access to this article

View all access and purchase options for this article.

References

Berti A., Frassinetti F. (2000). When far becomes near: Remapping of space by tool use. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 415–420.
Epstein W. (1961). The known-size-apparent-distance hypothesis. The American Journal of Psychology, 74, 336–346.
Epstein W. (1965). Non-relational judgments of size and distance. The American Journal of Psychology, 78, 120–123.
Fajen B. (2005). Perceiving possibilities for action: On the necessity of calibration and perceptual learning for the visual guidance of action. Perception, 34, 741–755.
Gallese V., Murata A., Kaseda M., Niki N., Sakata H. (1994). Deficit of hand preshaping after muscimol injection in monkey parietal cortex. NeuroReport, 5, 1525–1529.
Gonzalez C., Ganel T., Goodale M. (2006). Hemispheric specialization for the visual control of action is independent of handedness. Journal of Neurophysiology, 95, 3496–3501.
Iriki A., Tanaka M., Iwamura Y. (1996). Coding of modified body schema during tool use by macaque postcentral neurons. NeuroReport, 7, 2325–2330.
Linkenauger S.A., Proffitt D.R. (2008). The effect of intention and body capabilities on the perception of size. Journal of Vision, 8(6), Article 620. Available from http://journalofvision.org/8/6/620/
Linkenauger S.A., Witt J.K., Bakdash J.Z., Stefanucci J.K., Proffitt D.R. (2009). Asymmetrical body perception: A possible role for neural body representations. Psychological Science, 20, 1373–1380.
Maravita A., Husain M., Clarke K., Driver J. (2001). Reaching with a tool extends visual-tactile interactions into far space: Evidence from cross-modal extinction. Neuropsychologia, 39, 580–585.
Murata A., Gallese V., Luppino G., Kaseda M., Sakata H. (2000). Selectivity for the shape, size, and orientation of objects for grasping in neurons of monkey parietal area AIP. Journal of Neurophysiology, 83, 2580–2601.
Oldfield R.C. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9, 97–113.
Spielburg S. (Producer), Smith T.G. (Producer), Allen D. (Producer), Johnston J. (Director). (1989). Honey, I shrunk the kids [Motion picture]. United States: Walt Disney Pictures.
Taira M., Mine S., Georgopoulos A., Murata A., Sakata H. (1990). Parietal cortex neurons of the monkey related to the visual guidance of hand movement. Experimental Brain Research, 83, 29–36.
Todd J. (1955). The syndrome of Alice in Wonderland. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 73, 701–704.
Witt J.K., Proffitt D.R., Epstein W. (2005). Tool use affects perceived distance, but only when you intend to use it. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 31, 880–888.

Cite article

Cite article

Cite article

OR

Download to reference manager

If you have citation software installed, you can download article citation data to the citation manager of your choice

Share options

Share

Share this article

Share with email
EMAIL ARTICLE LINK
Share on social media

Share access to this article

Sharing links are not relevant where the article is open access and not available if you do not have a subscription.

For more information view the Sage Journals article sharing page.

Information, rights and permissions

Information

Published In

Article first published online: August 20, 2010
Issue published: September 2010

Keywords

  1. size perception
  2. embodied perception
  3. affordances
  4. handedness

Rights and permissions

© The Author(s) 2010.
PubMed: 20729479

Authors

Affiliations

Sally A. Linkenauger
Veronica Ramenzoni
University of Virginia
Dennis R. Proffitt
University of Virginia

Notes

Sally A. Linkenauger, Department of Psychology, University of Virginia, 102 Gilmer Hall, Charlottesville, VA 22904 E-mail: [email protected]

Metrics and citations

Metrics

Journals metrics

This article was published in Psychological Science.

VIEW ALL JOURNAL METRICS

Article usage*

Total views and downloads: 645

*Article usage tracking started in December 2016


Altmetric

See the impact this article is making through the number of times it’s been read, and the Altmetric Score.
Learn more about the Altmetric Scores



Articles citing this one

Receive email alerts when this article is cited

Web of Science: 71 view articles Opens in new tab

Crossref: 69

  1. A focus on the multiple interfaces between action and perception and t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  2. Comparing the Effects of Visual Realism on Size Perception in VR versu...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  3. On the Role of Interoception in Body and Object Perception: A Multisen...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  4. Gesundheitliche und soziale Aspekte
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  5. Alice in Wonderland: The effects of body size and movement on children...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  6. Full body illusion and cognition: A systematic review of the literatur...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  7. Perception of the non-dominant hand as larger after non-judgmental foc...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  8. The role of hand size in body representation: a developmental investig...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  9. The Body Scaling Effect and Its Impact on Physics Plausibility
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  10. Embodied Perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  11. Use of a real-life practical context changes the relationship between ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  12. Embodied Perception and Action in Real and Virtual Environments
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  13. Feeling, Seeing, and Liking: How Bodily Resources Inform Perception an...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  14. Visual Self-Motion Feedback Affects the Sense of Self in Virtual Reali...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  15. Perceived match between own and observed models’ bodies: influence of ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  16. HandMorph: a Passive Exoskeleton that Miniaturizes Grasp
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  17. Body illusion and affordances: the influence of body representation on...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  18. Mejora de la satisfacción corporal en la madurez a través de un progra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  19. Action perception and motor imagery: Mental practice of action
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  20. A Conceptual Model of Tactile Processing across Body Features of Size,...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  21. Getting a grasp on action-specific scaling: A response to Witt (2017)
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  22. Embodied Perception
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  23. Visual Perception and Evaluation of Photo-Realistic Self-Avatars From ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  24. The impact of using an upper-limb prosthesis on the perception of real...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  25. Trapped in a tight spot: Scaling effects occur when, according to the ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  26. Commentary: An Adaptation-Induced Repulsion Illusion in Tactile Spatia...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  27. Embodiment and Grounding in Cognitive Neuroscience
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  28. Object Size Perception in Immersive Virtual Reality: Avatar Realism Af...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  29. The effect of tool length on distance compression to the pointed objec...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  30. Embodiment in a Child-Like Talking Virtual Body Influences Object Size...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  31. Calibration to tool use during visually-guided reaching
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  32. Action potential influences spatial perception: Evidence for genuine t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  33. Upstream public engagement on coastal issues: Audience response to a s...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  34. Distortion in perceived size and body-based scaling in virtual environ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  35. Sex differences in the human visual system
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  36. Factors and Influences of Body Ownership Over Virtual Hands
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  37. Replicability, Response Bias, and Judgments, Oh My! A New Checklist fo...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  38. Illusions of having small or large invisible bodies influence visual p...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  39. Conceptual processing is referenced to the experienced location of the...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  40. Micromégas: Altered Body–Environment Scaling in Literary Fiction
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  41. Impaired processing of self-face recognition in anorexia nervosa
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  42. Action-specific effects in perception and their potential applications...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  43. Action-specific effects in perception and their potential applications...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  44. An Internal Model of the Human Hand Affects Recognition of Graspable T...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  45. Awareness Is Not a Necessary Characteristic of a Perceptual Effect...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  46. Extending Gurwitsch’s field theory of consciousness
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  47. Proprioceptive Body Illusions Modulate the Visual Perception of Reachi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  48. Virtual arm׳s reach influences perceived distances but only after expe...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  49. Implicit and Explicit Body Representations
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  50. Discovering your inner Gibson: Reconciling action-specific and ecologi...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  51. Evidence for Hand-Size Constancy: The Dominant Hand as a Natural Perce...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  52. Body ownership affects visual perception of object size by rescaling t...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  53. Amputation and prosthesis implantation shape body and peripersonal spa...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  54. Catching ease influences perceived speed: Evidence for action-specific...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  55. XII-Perceiving the Passing of Time
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  56. From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  57. Illusory ownership of a virtual child body causes overestimation of ob...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  58. Welcome to Wonderland: The Influence of the Size and Shape of a Virtua...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  59. How “Paternalistic” Is Spatial Perception? Why Wearing a Heavy Backpac...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  60. Tool-use reshapes the boundaries of body and peripersonal space repres...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  61. Spiders appear to move faster than non-threatening objects regardless ...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  62. Grasping in wonderland: altering the visual size of the body recalibra...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  63. Response Bias Cannot Explain Action-Specific Effects: Evidence from Co...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  64. The World Within Reach...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  65. A Moderate Approach to Embodied Cognitive Science
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  66. Body-Based Perceptual Rescaling Revealed through the Size — Weight Ill...
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med
  67. Visual information and rubber hand embodiment differentially affect re...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  68. Being Barbie: The Size of One’s Own Body Determines the Perceived Size...
    Go to citation Crossref Google Scholar
  69. Action-Specific Effects Underwater
    Go to citation Crossref Google ScholarPub Med

Figures and tables

Figures & Media

Tables

View Options

Get access

Access options

If you have access to journal content via a personal subscription, university, library, employer or society, select from the options below:

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.

APS members can access this journal content using society membership credentials.


Alternatively, view purchase options below:

Purchase 24 hour online access to view and download content.

Access journal content via a DeepDyve subscription or find out more about this option.

View options

PDF/ePub

View PDF/ePub

Full Text

View Full Text