How Important Is an Apology to You?: Forecasting Errors in Evaluating the Value of Apologies

First Published December 1, 2010 Research Article Find in PubMed

Authors

12
 
Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University
 
London Business School
by this author
, 2
 
London Business School
by this author
, 1
 
Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University
by this author
First Published Online: December 1, 2010

Apologies are commonly used to deal with transgressions in relationships. Results to date, however, indicate that the positive effects of apologies vary widely, and the match between people’s judgments of apologies and the true value of apologies has not been studied. Building on the affective and behavioral forecasting literature, we predicted that people would overestimate how much they value apologies in reality. Across three experimental studies, our results showed that after having been betrayed by another party (or after imagining this to be the case), people (a) rated the value of an apology much more highly when they imagined receiving an apology than when they actually received an apology and (b) displayed greater trusting behavior when they imagined receiving an apology than when they actually received an apology. These results suggest that people are prone to forecasting errors regarding the effectiveness of an apology and that they tend to overvalue the impact of receiving one.

Bennett, M., Dewberry, C. (1994). “I’ve said I’m sorry, haven’t I?” A study of the identity implications and constraints that apologies create for their recipients. Current Psychology: Developmental, Learning, Personality, Social, 13, 1020.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Berg, J., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K. (1995). Trust, reciprocity, and social history. Games and Economic Behavior, 10, 122142.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Darby, B.W., Schlenker, B.R. (1982). Children’s reactions to apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 742753.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
De Cremer, D., Schouten, B. (2008). When apologies for injustice matter: The role of respect. The European Psychologist, 13, 239247.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
De Cremer, D., van Dijk, E., Pillutla, M. (2010). Explaining unfair offers in ultimatum games and their effects on trust: An experimental approach. Business Ethics Quarterly, 20, 107126.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Epley, N., Dunning, D. (2000). Feeling “holier than thou”: Are self-serving assessments produced by errors in self- or social prediction? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79, 861875.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gilbert, D.T., Pinel, E.C., Wilson, T.D., Blumberg, S.J., Wheatley, T.P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 617638.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Gilbert, D.T., Wilson, T.D. (2000). Miswanting: Some problems in the forecasting of future affective states. In Forgas, J. (Ed.), Thinking and feeling: The role of affect in social cognition (pp. 178200). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Google Scholar
Goffman, E. (1955). On face-work. Psychiatry: Journal for the Study of Interpersonal Processes, 18, 213231.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. New York, NY: Basic Books.
Google Scholar
Kellerman, B. (2006). When should a leader apologize—and when not? Harvard Business Review, 84, 7281.
Google Scholar | Medline | ISI
Kim, P.H., Dirks, K.T., Cooper, C.D., Ferrin, D.L. (2006). When more blame is better than less: The implications of internal versus external attributions for the repair of trust after a competence- versus integrity-based trust violation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 99, 4965.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Kim, P.H., Ferrin, D.L., Cooper, C.D., Dirks, K.T. (2004). Removing the shadow of suspicion: The effects of apology versus denial for repairing competence- versus integrity-based trust violations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89, 104118.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Lewicki, R.J., Bunker, B. (1996). Developing and maintaining trust in work relationships. In Kramer, R.M., Tyler, T. (Eds.), Trust in organizations: Frontiers of theory and research (pp. 114139). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
Google Scholar
Newby-Clark, I.R., Ross, M., Buehler, R., Koehler, D.J., Griffin, D. (2000). People focus on optimistic scenarios and disregard pessimistic scenarios while predicting task completion times. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6, 171182.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Ohbuchi, K., Kameda, M., Agarie, N. (1989). Apology as aggression control: Its role in mediating appraisal of and response to harm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 219227.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Riordan, C.A., Marlin, N.A., Kellogg, R.T. (1983). The effectiveness of accounts following transgression. Social Psychology Quarterly, 46, 213219.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Risen, J.L., Gilovich, T. (2007). Target and observer differences in the acceptance of questionable apologies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 418433.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI
Schlenker, B.R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Google Scholar
Sherman, S.J. (1980). On the self-erasing nature of errors of prediction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 211221.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Sigal, J., Hsu, L., Foodim, S., Betman, J. (1988). Factors affecting perceptions of political candidates accused of sexual and financial misconduct. Political Psychology, 9, 273280.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Skarlicki, D.P., Folger, R., Gee, J. (2004). When social accounts backfire: The exacerbating effects of a polite message or an apology on reactions to an unfair outcome. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 34, 322341.
Google Scholar | Crossref | ISI
Tomlinson, E.C., Dineen, B.R., Lewicki, R.J. (2004). The road to reconciliation: Antecedents of victim willingness to reconcile following a broken promise. Journal of Management, 30, 165187.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wilson, T.D., Gilbert, D.T. (2003). Affective forecasting. In Zanna, M.P. (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 35, pp. 345411). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Google Scholar | Crossref
Wilson, T.D., Gilbert, D.T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14, 131135.
Google Scholar | SAGE Journals | ISI
Wilson, T.D., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J.M., Gilbert, D.T., Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 821836.
Google Scholar | Crossref | Medline | ISI

Access content

To read the fulltext, please use one of the options below to sign in or purchase access.
  • Access Options

    My Account

    Welcome
    You do not have access to this content.

    Chinese Institutions / 中国用户

    Click the button below for the full-text content

    请点击以下获取该全文

    Institutional Login

    Purchase Content

    24 hours online access to download content

    Added to Cart

    Cart is full

    There is currently no price available for this item in your region.

    Research off-campus without worrying about access issues. Find out about Lean Library here


Purchase

PSS-article-ppv for GBP27.00
PSS-article-ppv for $35.00